字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2018/12/29 05:41:36瀏覽288｜回應0｜推薦4 | |
| 【書摘】女囚—凡德伊的樂曲 (the phrase of Vinteuil) 3-2 Mais alors, n’est-ce pas que, de ces éléments, tout le résidu réel que nous sommes obligés de garder pour nous-mêmes, que la causerie ne peut transmettre même de l’ami à l’ami, du maître au disciple, de l’amant à la maîtresse, cet ineffable qui différencie qualitativement ce que chacun a senti et qu’il est obligé de laisser au seuil des phrases où il ne peut communiquer avec autrui qu’en se limitant à des points extérieurs communs à tous et sans intérêt, l’art, l’art d’un Vinteuil comme celui d’un Elstir, le fait apparaître, extériorisant dans les couleurs du spectre la composition intime de ces mondes que nous appelons les individus, et que sans l’art nous ne connaîtrions jamais ? (l’édition Gallimard, Paris, 1946-47) 由此說來，這些因素就是那確實不變的沉澱物嗎？這是一種無以言傳的東西，我們只能專為自己保存著，而無法轉達給別人，師友之間和情人之間的交談卻無以透露；這各人自身的沉澱物使個人之間的感受產生質的區別，它被迫留在樂句的門外，因為每個人進入樂句，與他人進行交流，都只能嚴格遵守大家共有的、毫無意義的外在符號。但是藝術卻非如此。凡德伊之藝術和埃爾斯蒂爾之藝術將這隱形的東西呈現出來，將這內心世界的構造外化於五顏六色之中。這內心世界就是我們所謂的個體，離開了藝術我們難道還能認識個體嗎？ (p.271 追憶似水年華 V 女囚 聯經版 1992) 這些情愫，這些我們非得為自己保留不可的內心的積澱，即使在朋友之間、師生之間、情人之間都是無法言傳的，它們能使每個人的感受產生質的差異，卻被擋在了言語的門外，言語的交流只能局限於人所共有、並無實盾意義的外在層次，而凡特伊和埃爾斯蒂爾這樣的藝術家，他們的藝術憑借樂音和畫畫的色彩，將我們內心世界的構造外化了，對這些被我們稱為個體感受的內心世界，要是沒有這樣的藝術，我們難道還能有所了解嗎？ (p.262 追尋逝去的時光 第五卷‧女囚 周克希譯 2012) But is it not the fact then that from those elements, all the real residuum which we are obliged to keep to ourselves, which cannot be transmitted in talk, even by friend to friend, by master to disciple, by lover to mistress, that ineffable something which makes a difference in quality between what each of us has felt and what he is obliged to leave behind at the threshold of the phrases in which he can communicate with his fellows only by limiting himself to external points common to us all and of no interest, art, the art of a Vinteuil like that of an Elstir, makes the man himself apparent, rendering externally visible in the colours of the spectrum that intimate composition of those worlds which we call individual persons and which, without the aid of art, we should never know? (Translated by C. K. Scott Moncrieff) But is it not the case that these elements, this final residue which we are obliged to keep to ourselves, which speech cannot convey even from friend to friend, from master to pupil, from lover to mistress, that this inexpressible thing which reveals the qualitative difference between what each of us has felt and has had to leave on the threshold of the phrases which he uses to communicate with others, something which he can do only by dwelling on points of experience common to all and consequently of no interest to any, can be expressed through art, the art of a Vinteuil or an Elstir, which makes manifest in the colours of the spectrum the intimate make-up of those worlds we call individuals, and which without art we should never know? (Translated by Carol Clark) |
|
| ( 知識學習｜隨堂筆記 ) |
