網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇  字體:
Psychology 101 of egocentrism
2009/02/06 09:39:03瀏覽1562|回應6|推薦24

The following is wikipedia's definition of "egocentrism", and my notes of it:

In psychology, egocentrism is defined as a) the incomplete differentiation of the self and the world, including other people and b) the tendency to perceive, understand and interpret the world in terms of the self.

egocentric: not capable of differentiating one's self and others or the world

The term derives from the Greek ego, meaning "I". An egocentric person has a limited theory of mind, cannot fully "put himself in other peoples' shoes," and believes everyone sees what he/she sees (or that what he/she sees, in some way, exceeds what others see).

egocentrism: I-centered, not able to realize that others perceive the world differently

It appears that this egocentric stance towards the world is present mostly in younger children. They are unable to separate their own beliefs, thoughts and ideas from others. For example, if a child sees that there is candy in a box, he assumes that someone else walking into the room also knows that there is candy in that box. He implicitly reasons that "since I know it, you should too". As stated previously this may be rooted in the limitations in the child's theory of mind skills.

theory of mind: the ability to attribute mental states—beliefs, intents, desires, pretending, knowledge, etc.—to oneself and others and to understand that others have beliefs, desires and intentions that are different from one's own

However, it does not mean that children are unable to put themselves in someone else's shoes. As far as feelings are concerned, it is shown that children exhibit empathy early on and are able to cooperate with others and be aware of their needs and wants.

egocentrism should not be confused with lack of empathy

Jean Piaget (1896-1980) claimed that young children are egocentric. This does not mean that they are selfish, but that they do not have the mental ability to understand that other people may have different opinions and beliefs from themselves.

egocentric is not the same as selfish

With his colleague Barbel Inhelder, Piaget did a test to investigate egocentrism called the three mountains problem (Piaget & Inhelder 1948/1956). He put children in front of a simple plaster mountain range and then asked them to pick from four pictures the view that he, Piaget, would see. Younger children before age 7, during the so-called pre-operational stage, picked the picture of the view they themselves saw and were therefore found to lack the ability to appreciate a viewpoint different from their own. In other words, their way of reasoning was egocentric. Only when entering the so-called concrete-operational stage at age 7-12, children became capable of decentring and could appreciate viewpoints other than their own. In other words, they were capable of cognitive perspective-taking.

cognitive perspective-taking is essential in breaking away from the egocentric pre-operational stage and into the concrete-operational stage during youth life

However, the mountains test has been criticized for judging only the child's visuo-spatial awareness, rather than egocentrism. A follow up study involving police dolls showed that even young children were able to correctly say what the interviewer would see. It is thought that Piaget overestimated the levels of egocentrism in children.

egocentrism should not be confused with lack of ability to exhibit one's visuo-spatial awareness

Egocentrism is thus the child's inability to see other peoples' viewpoints. The child at this stage of cognitive development assumes that their view of the world is the same as other people's, e.g. a little girl covers her eyes and says 'mummy you can't see me now, can you?'



( 心情隨筆心靈 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=GolfNut&aid=2621373

 回應文章

子胖先生
等級:8
留言加入好友
印度是多種族國家
2010/09/30 17:29
...印度這個種族,聰明、自私、奸詐、狡猾、這些都還好,最嚴重的問題就是道德感低下,到幾近於無。.....
=========================
印度並不是僅一個種族,而是多種族國家。
每個人都有侷限。在那句話裡揭示了您的局限。

我常造訪您的部落格,很少留言的...
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2010-10-01 04:42 回覆:

您說的沒錯,每個人都有他的侷限性。若我們不以人廢言,有侷限的人講的話容或不中聽,倒也未必不可聽。就好像我不是老虎伍茲,照樣可以談高爾夫球。


說“印度這個民族”確實是我不察,也許應該改成“印度人”即可。一國國民的民性一般似乎也不怎麼因族群之劃分而有太大的差異。語云:“人不親土親”,人的性格受地域的影響不可謂不大。同樣是漢人,我們台灣人不必開口講話讓人一看就知不是大陸來的。


我在歐洲時因為住得稍久,大城市裡熙來攘往的人我一看就知那個地方來的。要是再一開口就更確定了。


我對印度人的印象是實際生活上經年累月親身經歷後產生的,沒有自己主動加料。我很抱歉印度人給我的整體印象這麼差,這不是我願意或想要的。他們給我生活上帶來的挫折與麻煩甚多,一言難盡,我也不期望印度人改變,只求避開他們就好。



SCFtw2
等級:8
留言加入好友
這叫"此地無銀"~~~
2009/02/18 14:25
"連黑人、印地安人我都還可以稱兄道弟的。"
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2009-02-19 13:11 回覆:
你頭腦太複雜了,我想了兩天才知你意思。黑人和印地安人普遍受到歧視是事實,我提他們並沒有真歧視、又要說沒有的意思,只不過是承認他們飽受歧視的事實而已。我那印地安朋友從來不刷牙,煙抽得很兇,我怕髒,可是還是和他交往,至今已愈七年。印地安人幾乎永遠長髮及腰,性格和臺灣山地人差不多,真誠善良,從不雞腸鳥肚的。

SCFtw2
等級:8
留言加入好友
Such is a hint of ~~~
2009/02/16 20:13
"連黑人、印地安人我都還可以稱兄道弟的。"
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2009-02-18 06:28 回覆:
不是暗示,我的確有黑人和印第安朋友。

普希金 酷不停囉
等級:7
留言加入好友
就是把一照片放在別人面前
2009/02/09 10:55
再讓那人找出我角度的view

我老闆Ego很強 找他試去
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2009-02-11 17:27 回覆:

普兄,我太了解你的意思了。在我們這方圓幾十哩地方,臥虎藏龍,高手處處,公園溜狗的,市場買菜的,路上車禍吵架的,動不動就是專家、學者、博士,從小到大都是一向這個第一、那個第一的,誰沒帶那麼點 ego 啊?

做老闆有點 ego 是好的,想想他們吃的都是什麼 shit?我知道你說的不是那些身在 stratosphere 的大老闆,而是和我們習習相關的小老闆。我完全不羨慕,並且絕對尊重他們的 ego。再沒點 ego,他們就啥都沒了。

我認為做老闆的,不止要公平公正公開,道德感也很重要──不是光自己的道德感,還有對底下人的道德要求,也就是類似馬英九對他執政團隊的那種道德要求,或許還比老闆自己的道德要求還更重要些。

我在矽谷多年,對職場各式各樣形形色色人等,所見不可謂不多矣,自知學識技能之重要不在話下。可是公司為利之所趨,一味朝向技能偏頗,大抵輕忽道德人品這方面的要求,導致一線老闆們爭相以此為取向,以致羅致許多這類人等,聰明而無人品,才高卻道德低下,最後搞得一個原本可以好好發展的團隊烏煙瘴氣,一蹋糊塗,十分可惜。

我也不想指桑罵槐,欲蓋彌彰。明講了就是排山倒海而來的印度人。印度這個種族,聰明、自私、奸詐、狡猾、這些都還好,最嚴重的問題就是道德感低下,到幾近於無。每當我離開一間公司,心想,嘩!這輩子見過最賤的人就數誰誰了,到下一間公司馬上又大開眼界,硬是有更賤的印度人非讓我見識見識不可。我是真的被震撼到啞口無言,除了「賤」字無以名之。

再加上渾身那股怪味兒,以及嚴重口臭‧‧‧生而為印度人可說是一種詛咒。難怪老美說,"The only good Indian is a dead Indian"。

不知這算不算種族歧視,只不過我對世界上任何其他人種都沒有類似心結就是了。連黑人、印地安人我都還可以稱兄道弟的。


普希金 酷不停囉
等級:7
留言加入好友
有意思的實驗
2009/02/08 01:40
我去試試公司的同事囉 Just kidding ...
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2009-02-09 08:24 回覆:
普兄試了什麼?我不太清楚您的意思‧‧‧

anybody
等級:8
留言加入好友
報告老師
2009/02/06 22:02
這回學生的「腦筋」真的扭到了
GolfNut — 無心的邂逅(GolfNut) 於 2009-02-07 01:58 回覆:
只是查一下定義,留做參考而已。