喔對還有，女兒身材高挑像魚子醬，這和大腦心臟都沒關係。在美國比老美高有好處，這我有一半貢獻。

親愛的看客格友們，請千萬別誤以爲高本衲矮胖，沒這回事 —— 不要逼我噗全身立姿 portrait 玉照．．．

這一抱是永別，但人文精神長存。

在中國，五千年來文人是歷史的一切，I'm afraid that 此後五千年文人仍主宰中國 —— 也應該。

孔孟是文人，錢起是文人，蘇軾是文人，文天祥是文人，歐陽修是文人，岳飛是文人，胡適是文人。有沒有注意到很多史上著名文人都在宋朝？宋朝，是中國人文精華的世代。

不再沒關係，希望有承傳。I don't believe, I know。

中國百年、臺灣七十年來，前者始終 turmoil，後者只能算 aberration，歷史何其弔詭？請原諒高本衲「烙」英文（我真的沒在），因爲這樣比較貼切，換你是我就會知道。人講話達意就好。

高本衲勉強也算半個承傳中國的文人，我們這裡這種人很多。很高興略盡棉薄 —— 有點淡淡的哀傷不過。

長榮在 push 特優返臺機票，此間友朋口耳相傳興奮不置紛紛買票預備回臺。高本衲樂觀其成，可是我不回去了。

一言難盡。

到這裡：

https://www.lawrencemkrauss.com/contact

用他的網站：

寫一封電郵給 Dr. Krauss 和 professor Dawkins：

Believe means take something as true, and that's wrong, so we should all stop using this word. If we know something is true or false, we know it's true or false, otherwise we don't know anything about it and should say nothing about it, thus there's no place for believing, in anything.  Believe is a useless verb, mankind shouldn’t even have this concept. I've seen too many times Dr. Krauss and Dr. Dawkins being enticed into using this ridiculous word in debate and feel you folks should rebut or even chastise it with the above reasoning.

Another thing is about “not being able to prove the nonexistence of something”. We should not humbly acknowledge that we “cannot prove the nonexistence of God”, but instead should claim that “only the existence of something needs to be proven, the nonexistence of anything doesn't. If something is not known to exist, then it doesn't”.

I wish professor Dawkins can resolutely assert that he is a “7” next time. I am.

對不起，Karma 不是神明，是命運，特別是從因果觀點來解釋的命運。