你的審訊結果受影響你所選擇對你有利法律利它通過選擇法庭. 能幹律師代表客戶在開始訴訟 是確保他/她的客戶判決，不僅是有利的，但也可強制執行。

我 們繞著世界的另一邊, 美國, 比較，台灣法律制度是不成熟以及幼稚或, 恕我直言, 胡鬧,類似一些歐洲小國家，如西班牙。台灣法院不應該，在解釋的幌子，擴大法規的範圍，不包括內所提供情況下,亦不旨在由台灣國會議員或立法機構的意向。 再次的民主或人權，必須有良好的法律制度強加在社會利益和教育水平。因此，我不建議中國採納任何台灣法律或社會制度。台灣小，如果有什麼差錯很容易地進行 管理。

在台灣，你可以去法院而按法院的鈴控告某人無須經過任何程序法。程序性的正當法 律程序或公平性在台灣可能不存在，當事人的權利受到影響可能不會被聽到。例如不當的服務過程。最近聯合報報導台北地方法院發出逮捕令至一個電影明星或歌 星, 在法院她聲稱她沒有收到任何通知服務關於她已被計程車司機告有關她和司機 之間的糾紛。美國程序法是創造和實體法規定的法律權利。美國程序法很複雜，如相同的案件可能均受不同程序的管轄而甚至實體法規取決於該州的法庭訴訟。即使 在各州實踐變化極大,然而受美國聯邦憲法遏制需求的全國統一作用。

通常情況下，州的場 地規則要求的訴訟須在被告居住或有爭議的事件發生的區域。它會更複雜，如果被告是不同州或其他國家的公民而管轄權金額超過$75,000.00。那麼！爭 議或案件將受聯邦管轄。有利的法律選擇影響在選擇法院。能幹律師代表客戶在開始訴訟 是確保他/她的客戶判決，不僅是有利的，但也可強制執行。相 反，辯護律師是有機會挑戰原告的選擇法庭，甚至被告可能受益而裝傻從這無法執行的判決。

 根 據pennoyer規則，法院對被告沒有個人司法管轄權，不得發出個人判決。但是，每個美國50個州已經或採納其本身實質性的商業法律，被稱為“長臂法 律”，地方法院有權對企業或被告人管轄然而憲法的正當程序條款下，每個州法院只能在非居民被告或公司行使屬人管轄權如果被告有足夠的“最低聯繫”與該州來 證明管轄權。例如，一個公司或企業從其他州直接在另一個州銷售的產品是“有意收益”的而自身其他州或該州的法律，即足夠的接觸辯解管轄權。

 程序性正當程序，甚至實體法律正當程序在美國是非常複雜的。如果你有一個控訴，需要控告某人或你已經被告, 您可能需要律師對開始訴訟或抗辯的訴訟代表您。

 How to protect your personal or business legal rights in the United States!

We make a comparison with the other side of the world, U.S. Taiwan legal systems are immature and Childish or, with all due respect, monkey business, similar to some small European countries such as Spain. Taiwan Courts should not, in the guise of interpretation, enlarges the scope of a statute and include therein situations not provided nor intended by the Taiwan lawmakers or legislative bodies. Again democracy or human right must have good legal systems impose in interests of community as well as the level of the education. So, I would not recommend China adopt any legal or social system of Taiwan. Taiwan is small; if anything goes wrong it is easy to manage.

 In Taiwan, you may go to courthouse and ring the courthouse bell to sue someone without going through any procedural laws which procedural due process or fairness may not be existed and parties whose rights are to be affected may not be heard, such as improper service of process, Taipei district court issued an arrest warrant to a movie or singer star who claimed she did not receive a notice/service that she has been sued by Taxi driver for dispute between her and Taxi driver. Procedural laws are legal rights created and defined by Substantive Law. U.S. Procedural Laws can be very complicated such as the same case may be governed by much different procedural and even substantive rules depending on which state is forum for the litigation. However, even extreme variations in state practice are curtailed by the uniform nationwide effect of the federal Constitution’s demand.

Usually, state venue rules require that a lawsuit be brought in the area where the defendants reside or the disputed events occurred. However, it would be more complicated if the defendant is a citizen of different state(s) or a citizen of other country and jurisdictional amount is in excess of $75,000.00. Then, the controversies or cases will be under Federal jurisdiction. Choice of favorable law influences on choice of forum. The competent lawyer who commences litigation on behalf of a client is to secure for his/her client a judgment that is not only favorable but also enforceable. On the contrary, defense attorney is given the opportunity to challenge Plaintiff’s choice of forum or even the defendant may benefit and play possum from an unenforceable judgment.

 Under pennoyer rules, a court which has no personal jurisdiction over defendant may not issue an in personal judgment. However, each of the U.S. 50 states had or adopted its own substantive commercial laws, called a “long-arm statute” which the local courts have jurisdiction over corporation or defendant yet under the due process clause of the constitution each state court can only exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant or company if the defendant has had sufficient “minimum contacts” with the state to justify jurisdiction. For instance, a company or corporation from another state that sells products directly within another state is “purposefully availing” itself of the laws of the other state, which is sufficient contact to justify jurisdiction.

Jennie PC Chiang

 Disclaimer,

This is general legal concept; neither I nor WJ nor UDN intend to provide any legal service. Do not rely solely on aforesaid general legal concepts for your defense. You may lose your case based on your application of these general legal concepts. If you have any legal problems, then you should consult an attorney.