You have to be kidding me.

I asked you, "which part of my accusation is wrong".  I do acknowledge that I am accusing somebody of something.  I am asking you THAT "something"!

And your answer is that my finger pointing itself is wrong.

I can't care less about your dislike of being finger-pointed-at, like I said before: "finger-pointing itself is not wrong, it is what was the pointing for, that could be wrong."

You just don't like my finger, do you? Ok, then, I'll use my toe to do my toe-pointing.

I ask you about the substance that may be wrong, your answer merely refers to my action.

Are you playing dumb, or pretending you don't understand English because now you are being cornered?

If you don't get serious or refuse to be honest, you will be blocked.

是的，完全同意。我極少使用「自卑」二字，因為這兩個字不僅造成敏感，它的本身就極為敏感。既然您不避諱提了，我就大方的借花獻佛吧。

自卑其實是不必的，努力以赴就好；自滿也大可不必，虛懷若谷更佳。在過與不及間，中國大陸的表現較諸其他世界大國更顯兩極。我願意誠實的說，在這個應該「執兩用中」的端點上，百姓的表現遠不如政府。

此二極的中間點是什麼呢？且容我提出「自信」二字。

自信的人當然不自卑，更不會自滿。自信的人未必見得「溫良恭儉讓」，在此讓我各舉一信心滿滿的人來佐證：張飛、廖添丁、宮本武藏、Batman、老虎伍茲。喔，還有本衲，也是一個自信滿滿，五樣美德俱缺的人。自信的人容或不「溫良恭儉讓」，但也並不就常咬牙切齒、氣極敗壞，更不會老繃著一張苦大仇深似的臉四下裡去眦睚必報。

我期待多一些有自信的人上我這兒交流、酬答。

此帖暫不回復，原因詳參天涯比鄰 (zenit33233)前帖本人之回復。

你說的古狗緣由或許是對的 ─ 如果你有確實內幕資訊的話。若只是個人臆測，任誰都可以天馬行空隨意猜想。臆想是你個人主觀的自由，確實的客觀資訊可能更有價值些。世間道理大率如此，好吃的東西沒營養，營養的東西不好吃。

你後面那段，我可以大致如此回答，而這只是一個比方：

我認為你把「正義差異的存在」之無可避免與「懲治罪犯的法律」之實際價值混為一談了。

還有，指責別人並不須要自己完美無缺，只要指責者言之成理即可。很多時候被指責的人其資格水準條件成份遠高於指責者。在臺灣指責馬英九總統的人何只千萬？這些指責者有幾人的資格水準條件成份高於馬總統？恐怕連一個都沒有，要有的話，幹嘛不是那個人現在坐在總統的位子上？

那麼這成千上萬的指責就無效了嗎？當然不。就不該指責了嗎？當然也不。

此帖暫不回復，原因詳參天涯比鄰 (zenit33233)前帖本人之回復。

Don't get too excited just yet. How can I possibly give you such an easy chance to accuse me of anything? If you think I am stupid, then you are stupid, because I don't think you are stupid. It is you who is not getting it.

I don't care what Hillary said, I merely expressed my feeling about her speech, but I do care what you said about what I said. Now, tell me if you will, which part is wrong when I "point your finger at the Chinese people". I am not giving you an easy way out here, now that you are accusing me of something I don't think I did. You can't just vaguely say, that I pointed my finger at Chinese people, and was wrong. But if I did, I did point my finger at the Chinese government, as I always do. Still, let's assume you meant to say that I pointed my finger at the Chinese government, you'll have to tell me which part of my accusation is wrong. Finger-pointing itself is not wrong, it is what was the pointing for, that could be wrong. When did ANY Chinese people EVER stop pointing their fingers at America? Do you think that is wrong also?

Now the second part. How do you know I am or was "agreeing and accepting everything Americans do or say, right or wrong, as 普世價值? " , where is your proof? You'll have to answer this question, too, if you are serious about what your post. I won't give you an easy way out here, either. Remember you said "everything". 「普世價值」by definition, are accepted worldly, has nothing to do with America in particular. If you can't prove that I agree and accept everything Americans do or say, right or wrong, as 普世價值, YOU are then the one who is doing a false accusation.

Thirdly, as to "wagging your tail and hailing blindly at everything American as Godly", that is what you SAID, not what I DID. I will pardon your transgression here, as these are nothing more than your personal emotion. I don't have a tail, I am obviously not blind, and I totally don't believe in God, any god. Your sentence serves no meaningful purpose.

Lastly, about "your criticisms as fake, hypocritical, and stinky", I don't care about the fake, hypocritical, or stinky part, I want to know WHICH CRITICISM you are refering to. You are going to answer this one also, otherwise, you are again making a fool of your self, as I can send this exact same sentence back to you, that "your criticisms as fake, hypocritical, and stinky", WITHOUT ANY SUBSTANTIATING EVIDENCE.

Oh, I forgot to mention that, if this fourth comment is a mere OPINION, not a STATEMENT, then I'll pardon you also. But, then there you have it, I am sending it right back to you, and it's merely my personal opinion, not a statement, and nor do I need any proof.

You owe me three answers, and you will chip in your due diligence in answering them HONESTLY. Or else, you will be blocked, BUT YOUR PAST POSTING MAY STAY INDEFINITELY, as historical evidence of your ridiculous behavior. As I wait for your reply, any/all of your ensuing posting will be ignored, because I will deal with you about this one, and this one only, for now. If you choose not to come back, it is not encouraged but then I respect your choice. You have freedom of speech here, absolutely.

您說的確實一針見血。

這也是為什麼我說「不正常」的原因。

凱悅您說的有理，許多實質問題都被您說中了。解決這麼多問題須要時間、金錢、知識、意志、智慧、改變‧‧‧追根究底，政府仍必須負起全責。然而中共政權有一個打不開的死結 ─ 黨的生存問題。核心深處就是它的意識型態。今天的中共之所以一切都可以、也願意改變，只有極權、專政、不民主、不自由這些絕對、萬萬、打死不能變，就是因為跟這個黨的生死存滅息息相關。之所以稱為死結，是因為它改也不是，不改也不是，二者都複雜、困難、龐大、危險得不得了。言論自由只是這個問題的一小部份，谷歌事件只是暴露這小部分的一個引子，我這篇文只是對這引子的一個個人看法。

臺灣一切所有的問題都是馬總統造成的嗎？當然不是。為什麼大家一天到晚罵他呢？因為他是總統啊。中國大陸一切所有的問題都是共產黨造成的嗎？當然不是。為什麼舉世的目光和箭頭都指向中共呢？因為它是唯一的，永遠的、在朝的執政黨啊！

喔，我明白了，你說的「事實」指的是你上一帖有關郭冠英的回應吧？郭冠英我是同情的，我們有一陣子常說「悄悄話」﹝他來我訪客簿﹞，我還跟他本人在美見過面呢。

不過本文不談郭冠英事件。我去年六月早有一文在此：試代郭冠英答問。

谷歌最後如何與我干？我的文有預測嗎？在那裡提到的？你又敘述了什麼「事實」？什麼是「學院派」？我自稱過嗎？「不敢」、「有種」、「搖旗吶喊」這些辭彙，有開始「抓狂」的味道了，何必、又何苦呢？

雖然你自稱「大老粗」，我還是不願意以此貶損你的人。不理性是萬惡之源，如果你的命不太好，人生未盡如意，請從檢討自己的理性水平開始做起。這絕非針對你個人，我四十歲之後就一直以此規勸不快樂、不如意的人，常上我這兒的無人不知無人不曉。這是我的肺腑之言。讓您不高興的地方，對不住，算我得罪了。