This is the worst time in American history that we could not find better President candidates that we have to choose the lesser of two evils. Whilst I have not dealt with Trump directly, I would not trust him based on my prior company's dealings with him and discussion with friends who dealt with him directly.
Subject to the advice and consent role of the U.S. Senate, the President negotiates treaties with foreign nations, but treaties enter into force if ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. The President is also Commander in Chief, however only Congress has authority to declare war, and the civilian and military budget is written by the Congress. In nearly all of these circumstances, Congress can either support the President's approach or seek to change it. In the case of independent Presidential action, it may be very difficult to change policy in the short term; in the case of a legislative proposal by the executive branch or treaties and international agreements submitted to the Senate or Congress for approval, Congress has a decisive voice. US President does not control our foreign policy. Both parties have made bad decision on US foreign policy.
As President of his business empire, Trump has not taken care of his staff. He used all available legal loophole to succeed for himself at the expense of his people. Why do you think that he will change his character and take care of us after becoming President of the US?
The only thing I agree with Trump is to buy back our debt at a discount , say, 50 cents in a dollar. I hope he walks his talk if he gets elected. But this will reduce the reserve of China and Taiwan substantially. Both Trump and I have used this tactics against our creditors. Actually, I did 10 cents in a dollar when I first came to the US for corporate reorganization.

Yes, I heard about Trump's past business dealings (not good). However, when talked about the lesser of the two evils, I'm not so sure.
Same can be said for HRC. Why did Debbie Wasserman have to resign? Why did DNC fire Scott Foval?? What happen to Seth Rich?? I believe the official version.
Obama: Middle East disaster (Europe has to thank Obama for that), Pivot to Asia (divide and conquer), giving amnesty to millions who break the law, transgender bath room (giving pervert excuse to woman bathroom), more crimes and murders (best illustrated in Chicago).
John McCain: Anti-Asian, warmonger
Mitt Romney: Part of the corruption establishment. Being a private equity guy, he gain millions in corrupt tax break. If you don't understand how private equity work, they charge 2/20 meaning 2% management fee (a fee that they charge you even you have a loss) and 20% carry/profits. They take a 20% cut of the gain of their clients and it's was treated as capital gain tax (about half of income tax rate) even though it's not their money that was invested. This is of course due to the legal corruption/lobbyist.

This election has been for the first time see social media vs the established news media – a lesson to be learned… - Trump exploits social media to the fullest – distorting facts, sending out lies. He exploits the populations inside manufacturing belt of the US that has lost jobs. Trump leveraged the news media at the beginning particularly the primaries to his advantage – always making statements that everybody like to hear but without details or offering specifics on how he fix problems. It works in the primary – where you have ~ 10 candidates where it is hard to press for details – but the media soon see through this. But such strategy cannot hold up with US presidential debate.. The last month, fact finding is everything to correct such a deceptive campaign. White educated, Hispanics, Asians, Women came out in forces to fight against this disaster.
I do not believe Trump has any place to be in any office. Hillary has her problems – but most of the claims against her has been exaggerated/distorted by the Trump campaign. Her email server practice was careless. It is very unfortunate that this FBI letter come in such a short time before the election – damage has been done – it was finally corrected Sunday.

CNN of course plus all other global media (with a few exceptions) and TVB and other HK media. They never cover the corruption of Clintons (WH in the 90's, Clinton foundation) and mysterious death of Vince Foster and Seth Rich. If you believe the official version of these deaths, you should also believe the official version of Causeway Bay Bookstore. If they cover only 50% of the Clinton Foundation corruption (vs. what were covered in the Malaysian and S. Korean corruptions), it would not be HRC.
I agree with Andrew's repeated assertion in emails that Hillary probably will win. Based on 1) gender and race cards played by DNC, 2) GOP split, 3) certain ethnic/religion groups (2 groups in particular) against Trump, 4) whole media against Trump as they are under the guidance from DNC, there is no way for Trump to win and it could be the biggest loss for GOP since Barry Goldwater.
Just to give you an example of how media is misleading the public, I was watching on Sunday morning on CBS morning show and they interviewed Trump whether he disavow the KKK/David Duke. Trump said something to the effect that he would not want the endorsement of KKK/David Duke. That same night on CBS evening news, CBS reported the opposite and use a clip of NBC news (without interviewing Trump) instead of its own because Trump said it would not want the KKK endorsement. Whether Trump wanted the KKK endorsement, that's a different story.
The US media is acting like the Chinese Communist media now.