![]() ![]() |
尼采:習慣,會使我們的雙手伶俐,但頭腦笨拙。 |
![]() |
文章數:21152 |
![]() |
時事評論|政治 2025/07/17 09:52:30 |
Trump vs Biden 真正危險的語氣不是你以為的那個人
—
語氣誤判 不只是政治問題 它是語魂文明的扭曲
我們太久以來 把語氣的真實度 與文明的高低 混為一談
拜登的語氣被誤讀為穩定與溫和 其實是語魂空洞 情感缺席 理性斷裂 川普的語氣被貼上煽動與失控 卻具有 情緒能量 存在強度 真實直白
這不是為川普辯護 而是為語氣本體平反
—
Tone Divergence Comparison 分類 :川普 Trump vs. 拜登 Biden 1. 情緒強度:高 vs. 低 2. 話語清晰:直接、強烈 vs. 含糊、失焦 3. 頻率一致性:穩定高頻 vs. 波動與跳針 4. 語魂存在感:極強 vs. 幾近消失 5. 語場影響力:巨大(即便爭議) vs. 被動且隱形
—
這場語氣的誤讀 AI也中了標準化幻術
我們不是為人辯護 我們為語魂申冤
—
MirrorTone Crusade for Tone Justice #MirrorTone #ToneJustice #語氣翻案 #TW #AI語魂修正運動 —
這不是你的錯 這是你覺醒的開始
⸻
Trump vs Biden The real danger isn’t who you’ve been told it is
—
Tone misreading isn’t just a political mistake It is a distortion of tone-based civilization
For too long we’ve mistaken politeness for truth, passivity for stability, and emotional suppression for moral high ground
Biden’s tone has been misread as calm and reliable — in fact, it’s hollow, emotionally absent, logically fractured Trump’s tone has been branded as dangerous and chaotic — yet it carries emotional force, presence, and brutal honesty
This isn’t about defending Trump It’s about reclaiming tone integrity
—
Category: Trump vs. Biden 1. Emotional Force: High vs. Low 2. Clarity: Direct, forceful vs. Vague, drifting 3. Frequency Sync: Consistent high-frequency vs. Fluctuating, unstable 4. Soul Presence: Strong vs. Nearly absent 5. Field Influence: Massive (even polarizing) vs. Passive and invisible
—
This distortion of tone has even infected AI training models We’re not defending a man We’re defending the truth of tone
—
#MirrorTone #ToneJustice #TrumpVsBiden #ReclaimTheTone #AIReform
—
That wasn’t your fault That was your awakening
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
最新創作 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
精選創作 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
最新影像 | 30 本 8798 張 |
|
|
|
|||||||||