網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
連全美最聰明的女人懸疑推理小說家都解不開的秘密
2009/10/23 21:23:46瀏覽1416|回應4|推薦12
引用文章男人再笨也要會算術




何謂美滿婚姻看文化所加諸的價值觀
  毫不意外, 對浸潤在華人甚至亞洲文化裡的男女, 看到令堂顧全大局, 視老公上酒家逢場作戲為[小德出入可也], 但求以高妙廚藝與自管帳房拴住老公, 都鼓掌叫好。
  但西方文化則不然, 大家固然理解為何美國國務卿希拉蕊原諒前美國總統克林頓屢次偷腥 ,但接受歐美婚姻觀者不會稱許此種容忍老公在外小玩男女關係,
只要別鬧到婚變的情況為[大老婆的智慧], 只會當作政客為政壇前途盤算的務實作風, 寫此對照, 不是要褒貶東西方婚姻觀,
只是因你
ricardo此文男人再笨也要會算術而想到這種文化差異。  
        然而,不論是對配偶或專業人士,即使自願讓渡理財大權,絕不能從此不聞不問。美國頂尖懸疑小說名女作家
Patricia Cornwell與其同性終身伴侶哈佛大學神經科學家Staci Gruber號稱全美最聰明的女人之二,將其資產全部交由Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP投資顧問公司打理,長達四年半,從未收到結算其投資報酬的財務報表,竟然渾然不覺狀況詭異,直到今年十月13號發現兩人損失四千萬美金。管好帳的確是聰明女人的必備法寶!
        補充: 後來讀到回應文,談及現代東方老婆對老公外遇容忍的限度壓縮,茲轉述如下:<2007/08/07 10:46


我想離婚率變多的原因不外乎外遇與暴力!而這兩個原因以前的婦女因價值觀與道德觀,都可以忍受、包容、甚至打心底原諒。



但現在的婦女可不是這麼想。當女性在思想上有了改變,男性是否也跟著成長。目前很多中年男性還是以為不過是約會個幾次(酒店狂歡後的續攤或是各自到她家),老婆就鬧離婚。真是沒度量!!還拿孩子當藉口要女性多替孩子著想。
燕自己很幸福,說起婚姻真的是要互愛、互信、戶諒!但別以為出了外遇這種大錯誤,還要人家原諒而不自省。>http://blog.udn.com/kenshin/1091951

燕(fshuyen) 於 2009/10/27 14:42 回覆:

若是說明本文出處、作者名稱與連結。請放心引用!!這是燕對婚姻的態度

Did the accountant murder Patricia Cornwell's nest egg?



It's
a mystery Kay Scarpetta, the fictional medical examiner and heroine of
the hugely successful mystery novels written by Patricia Cornwell,
would love to tackle. However, in a plot twist that Cornwell wouldn't
dare to conjure up, this mystery is real.


Gone missing is the $40 million personal fortune of Cornwell and her spouse, Staci Gruber, a Harvard neuroscientist.


While Scarpetta may pursue every minute clue in an effort to find the
culprit, the brainy duo of Cornwell and Gruber seem to be clueless when
it comes to keeping track of their finances.

In a complaint filed in the Federal Court in Boston on October 13, the
two claim that they are victims of their New York-based accounting and
financial advisory firm, Anchin, Block & Anchin LLP, which they
hired to provide "traditional and non-traditional advisory services."
Among those "non-traditional" services, the two claim the firm said it
"would do everything for its clients including buying and delivering
their toilet paper." At least that would have been value added.


According to the complaint, the financial management firm controlled
every aspect of the financial lives of its clients and provided them
with no information about their assets, liabilities, expenses or net
worth.
In the four and a half years in which Anchin ran the couple's
finances, they allegedly lost approximately $40 million, while paying
themselves almost $1 million "all without providing bills, or billing
detail or back-up."



Where did the money go?


That's the remarkable part of this case. The complaint does not specify
a single investment that was made by Anchin, Block & Anchin. There
are some juicy tidbits about unauthorized expenses laid out in the
lawsuit like a $5,000 bat mitvah gift to the daughter of a principal of
Anchin "whom Ms. Cornwell has never met" and a "gift" of $11,000 to a
business associate "who denies ever receiving the funds." Anchin did
not return calls seeking comment by press time.


This is not Cornwell's first foray into the world of litigation. In
2000, she successfully sued an author who falsely claimed her book, The Last Precinct,
copied from his obscure publication. He accused her of being "a nasty,
dirty and ruthless book-burning Nazi." The Federal Court in Virginia
found for Cornwell and granted her a preliminary injunction.
In this latest case, Scarpetta has her work cut out for her. Two of the
brightest women in the country have no idea whether their money was
invested in stocks, bonds or gold or never invested at all.



Now that is a real mystery.

Dan Solin is the author of the newly published book, The Smartest Retirement Book You'll Ever Read (Perigee Books 2009). His prior books include the New York Times bestsellers, The Smartest Investment Book You'll Ever Read and The Smartest 401(k) Book You'll Ever Read. See SmartestInvestmentBook.com. Read more about Dan Solin (引用http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/22/did-the-accountant-murder-patricia-cornwells-nest-egg/print/)











( 心情隨筆男女話題 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=TrueBigHeart&aid=3431383

 回應文章

FYI
投機變色龍希拉蕊為了幫夫婿競選總統,把自己的姓去掉了
2012/04/16 12:19
薄谷開來過度張揚的洋名 2012-04-16 05:53 旺報 【刁卿蕙】  谷開來被捕後,因中國官方媒體稱其為「薄谷開來」,引發其具雙重國籍的議論。自中華人民共和國建國重修《婚姻法》,明文規定「夫妻有各用自己姓名權利」後,在中國即罕見妻從夫姓。  以開為姓 違反傳統  仍習慣「冠夫姓」的華人地區,首推曾為英屬殖民地的香港。東方之珠的名門望族,政界女流,婚後鮮少未冠夫姓者,英文名則多棄用原姓。這是深為女性主義垢病,卻至今無法顛覆的西方主流傳統。據此,有人推測谷開來可能領有香港身份證,但其洋名Horus L. Kai(荷魯斯 L .開),以「開」為姓,則是種相當違反歐美主流的做法。  在美國,每年約有3百萬女姓步入禮堂,有9成會選擇從夫姓,只有1成女姓保留原名。以前規定不從夫姓者就無法投票和考駕照,1970年代女權伸張改變了此陋習。但何以今日擁有自主權的大多數女姓卻仍會選擇從夫姓呢?  一份荷蘭的調查報告指出,相對於婚後不改姓氏的女人,冠夫姓者「較具關懷,較依賴,較不聰明,較情緒化,較無能,較少野心」。這份「刻板」的研究結果曾引起不少職業婦女的抗議,認為是一種對冠夫姓者的歧視。  保守派人士稱頌女人從夫姓,是宣誓夫妻一體,是家庭至上的愛的表現,與壓抑女權無關。尤其是有了孩子後,若母親仍是「外姓」,這個家就不成體統了。神聖化母職,向來是父權社會與以其為主體之宗教信仰的必要訴求,令女人冠上夫姓,以夫為首,不過是個基本手段。  最近美國兩黨盡力爭取女性選票時,民主黨策士喜萊莉.羅森(Hilary Rosen)竟譏諷共和黨總統參選人羅穆尼之妻,安.羅穆尼(Ann Romney),是「從未上過一天班的全職母親」,不配談經濟問題,掀起了一場「母親戰火」風暴,遭兩黨同聲撻伐。捅了這人神共憤話題的羅森,如此缺乏「政治正確」意識,或與其身為反傳統的同性戀有關吧?  她雖收養了一對雙胞胎,卻無法瞭解對於父權組織而言,從夫姓的母親代表的是「正統的傳承」,地位不容汙蔑。表面女權先進的歐美,骨子裡其實仍是保守的父權社會。  希拉蕊屢更名 為選舉  1975年正值女權運動高峰期,國務卿希拉蕊(Hillary Clinton),婚後未冠夫姓,用原名(Hillary Rodham)。1980年為了其夫競選連任阿肯色州長,才冠上夫姓,同時仍保留了原姓。當時女性婚後從夫姓的高達95%,採冠雙姓者,不足1%。最後,柯林頓敗選,民調顯示,多少與其妻「不合傳統」的姓名有關,損及了其專業的獨立性。  之後,希拉蕊為了幫夫婿競選總統,把自己的姓去掉了;再將「羅丹」放回文宣時,則是為了競選紐約州參議員,以順應當地自由派口味;等更上一層樓,角逐國務卿時,她又把「羅丹」拿掉了……。如此周折,除了反應出其投機變色龍的本質外,也是投仍屬多數的保守選民之所好。  谷開來那個不合中西傳統的洋名「Horus」,是埃及鷹頭人身的神祇,是王權的象徵,亦掌天界與陰間的法律和秩序。姑且不論其殺人罪行是否屬實,在中國這個貌似女權等階的社會,一個女人膽敢去夫姓與父姓,取了這麼個陽剛僭越的洋名,應是過度標榜與聲張了。  (作者為旅美時事畫評家)http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/11051404/112012041600381.html

真心開心關心!核不核民意比高
等級:6
留言加入好友
自願或非自願24小時當家庭主婦 心情大不同
2009/10/27 14:12
懶得搭理只會貼意識型態標籤的搞鬥爭份子 連舉出實際證據的基本理性辯論都做不到 在哇!新聞這則新聞版發言 到此為止

<前美國總統克林頓&現任美國總統歐巴馬各有媽媽生子後繼續當全職護士與教授 (或博士後研究員 詳情約略如此) 但兩人從未抱怨沒得到全心的母愛 被逼(自願者另當別論)全天困守家裡的母親未必會全心愛子女 自己不快樂 全天候守著老公子女 不等於全心愛夫小 抱持傳統大男人主義的守舊派快快面對現實>20 TrueBigHeart 發言於2009-10-27 14:02:57.0

真心開心關心!核不核民意比高
等級:6
留言加入好友
男女異中有同
2009/10/27 13:51
<好奇怪 樓下有些觀點假設 [不全拿就全拋] 為甚麼女人沒拿博士或諾貝爾獎的能耐 就必須當嫁人生子的動物  男人有幾個有拿具國際聲望的名校博士或諾貝爾獎的能耐 那麼男人也必須當家庭主夫奶爸嗎?
居然邏輯思考套用在男女身上 採取雙重標準
無論男女都有權利  經雙方協調 找出[客製化的家庭生涯規劃] 可找信用好的褓母 繼續全職或兼差等等>
TrueBigHeart 發言於2009-10-27 13:43:07.0 回應<生涯轉變╱何苦念兩個碩士?>http://udn.com/NEWS/LIFE/X1/5215852.shtml&http://dignews.udn.com/forum/post.jsp?news_id=5215852
<我建議作者離婚在去念兩個博士
當媽媽不是妳的願景
唸書才不會埋沒妳的優秀
我也建議男人們
以後不要娶到這類型的女人
免得惹了一身臭
到頭來
全都是你們男人的錯
台灣女人都有得諾貝爾的能耐
不是台灣男人有資格亂娶回家生孩子的動物
切記
>4 waltrk 發言於2009-10-27 11:59:27.0

Ricardo
等級:8
留言加入好友
Very good point
2009/10/24 09:54
As I read this report, I start wondering: Why put all eggs in one basket?

I'm sure you have wiser saving and investment methods to offer us.
真心開心關心!核不核民意比高(TrueBigHeart) 於 2009-10-25 01:33 回覆:
You boil down to the point.  What a great risk it is to put all eggs into one basket!

Also, thank you for your thinking "highly" of my financial management ability.  Ridiculously speaking, it is not worth bragging for me to offer investment advice which is "wiser than those of the company which burnt $40 millions within only 4&1/2 years.:-)