回應: 酸扁?大可不必!(時事雜感 93 )
媒體與政府應該共[舞]或共[武]?
雙方不必[交友],但也不必[樹敵].分寸如何拿捏?在民主先進國家如美國,已經有政治傳播學者深入探討政治記者與消息來源之間無可避免的[共生](互相依賴或利用)之關係,曾略讀一二,但並非主要專長,只能點到為止。
[第四部門]所謂記者或社論主筆批評時政時,旁觀者通常要求評論者[對事不對人],這種規範多少有點陳腔濫調。
一般人際相處需要[對事不對人],乃[通情]放在[達理]的前面,為了維持良好的人際關係,即使必須指出對方的缺失,也得把話說得婉轉,〔辣味七分]的實話需要調味降成[辣味五分+甜味五分]的外交辭令。
但身為當權政壇人事的監督者,此種專業腳色並非視政治人物為左鄰右舍來打交道或拉[私人]關係,而且選民挑政府官職與民意代表候選人時,本來就應該考量[人]與[事],亦即人格特質、人品與過去制定的政策、以及行政成效,因此監督立法、司法、及行政[三部門]的政論家,必須[對事也對人],嚴加觀察把關,甚至講出[辣味八九分]的實話,得罪當道,也在所不惜。
2008-05-24
18:46 |
The critical difference between Ma and Chen lies in
whether one obstructs attorneys’ investigations. Chen put huge amount of money
into his own pockets (yes, very likely more than one pockets) in the name of
secret diplomatic operations, that is, without any records for public scrutiny.
By contrast, Ma has shown records of how the money flows among bank accounts.
His monetary transfers have been proved to be acceptable according to the
requirements for handling administrative funds.
Hence, 樓下冷水坑confused Chen’s act of transferring
government funds into Hidden Accounts with Ma’s act of transferring public
funds into Publicly Known Accounts. You need to clarify your thought process.2008-05-25 01:48
|
馬說[台大人執政]之前說<<至目前為止,台灣有三位民選總統,三位都出自台大,台大人對國家影響很大>>
顯然根據上下文,他所謂[台大人]主詞並非泛指所有台大畢業生,只限指[台大畢業生中由人民選出來當總統的傑出校友], 當然總統(如扁)做爛了,[傑出]應該改稱[疥出]病發。
因此並無William所謂[3樣本不能代表數十萬母體]的實證邏輯問題
BTW, 樓下冷水坑應該寫someone feels bored, not boring.
2008-05-25 13:33
|
http://blog.chinatimes.com/prayer/archive/2008/05/24/281274.html#281347