「美國為了自己的利益著想」。請問哪個國家不為自己的利益著想?政府的存在不就是要爭取、增加自己的國家利益嗎?特別是民主政體,不以國家利益為考量,選票何來?台灣政府在外交層面上以誰的利益著想?
對你及其他人提出的指控,請看「事實查核中心」的回應:
https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/8285
你提到的「2022台灣政策法」第604條「寫明」美國將派人入駐台灣政府。應該是下面的SEC. 605.吧?我橫看、豎看,怎麼都看不到美國會派人入駐台灣政府呢?
(也許你應該留意一下你的消息來源?)
TITLE VI: SUPPORTING UNITED STATES EDUCATIONAL AND EXCHANGE PROGRAMS WITH TAIWAN
· SEC.601. Short Title. Cited title as the “Taiwan Fellowship Act.” · SEC.602. Findings. Findings on the importance of extensive, close, and amicable commercial, cultural, and other relations between Americans and Taiwanese and Taiwan’s leadership in global public health, consistent with the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018. Acknowledgement of Taiwan’s global growth and leadership in responding to the coronavirus global pandemic, despite the People’s Republic of China’s concerted isolation campaign. Supports the creation of a U.S. fellowship program with Taiwan. · SEC.603. Purposes. Promotes federal government fellowships to Taiwan to strengthen strategic partnership with Taiwan, broaden understanding of the Indo-Pacific region, learn Mandarin Chinese language skills, and advance economic, security, and human rights interests and values in the Indo-Pacific region. · SEC.604. Definitions. Defines important terms for the title, including agency heads, agency of the United States Government, appropriate congressional committees, detailee, implementing partner, and Program. · SEC.605. Taiwan Fellowship Program. Establishes the Taiwan Fellowship Program to provide eligible federal government employees with fellowship opportunities in Taiwan lasting up to two years. Requires fellows to complete: (1) a curriculum of Mandarin Chinese, Taiwanese politics, and Indo-Pacific geopolitics; and (2) one year of service in an office of the Government of Taiwan or another relevant Taiwanese organization. Directs initiation of negations for the purpose of entering into an agreement to facilitate placement of fellows and selecting implementing partners. Sets program requirements including eligibility requirements, responsibilities, and noncompliance directives. · SEC.606. Reports and Audits. Requires the Department of State to annually report on the performance of the program, sponsoring agencies, offices of assignment,
recommendations for improvement, and the Program’s value upon improving the relationship between the U.S. and Taiwan. Requires an annual financial audit of the implementing partner, including access to documents, and a report containing its findings. · SEC.607. Taiwan Fellows on Detail from Government Service. Authorizes federal government agencies to detail fellows to the American Institute in Taiwan for the purposes of the service in the Government of Taiwan or relevant Taiwanese organizations and outlines their status and responsibilities. Requires fellows to continue in the service of the sponsoring agency at the end of fellowship and includes details of the agreement and clarification of exceptions. · SEC.608. Funding. Authorizes approximately $2.9 million in appropriations for 2023 and $2.4 million for 2023 and each succeeding fiscal year to the American Institute in Taiwan for launching and sustaining the Taiwan Fellowship Program. Authorizes the implementing partner to accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations for the program. · SEC.609. Supporting United States Educational and Exchange Programs with Taiwan. Promotes U.S. policy of supporting educational and exchange programs with Taiwan. Authorizes the U.S.-Taiwan Cultural Exchange Foundation, an independent nonprofit dedicated to deepening ties between the future leaders of Taiwan and the U.S., and to send students to Taiwan to study the Chinese language, culture, history, politics, and other relevant subjects. Allows partnerships between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office and state and local education institutions to establish programs to promote education and cultural exchanges. Requires the Secretary of State to report cooperation between the U.S. Government and Government of Taiwan to create an alternative to Confucius Institutes.
|