永生之神的真相~耶和華都會死,何來耶穌永生夢囈
網址https://goo.gl/vPhPd9
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案1.淫亂是非不分的教義
瘟魔「耶和華」誘姦木匠「約瑟」的未婚妻「馬利亞」,竟要教徒天天「哈路里亞」讚美它們一番!
盲信徒「羅得」為了魔鬼附身的天使(即靈媒)竟要推二個處女的女兒要讓外邦人姦淫,並酒後亂性與二女兒亂倫,這種邪人,基督教竟尊稱他是『義人』
伯15:14人是什麼,竟算為潔淨呢?婦人所生的是什麼,竟算為義呢?
「耶穌」的老媽族譜竟是集亂倫,通姦,妓女的榮光的大全~「他瑪」與公公亂倫(猶太人是女系宗譜)、「喇合」是職業妓女、「路得」來自於搞父女亂倫「羅得」女兒「摩押人」後代、謀殺丈夫的「拔示巴」與「大衛王」搞通姦,耶穌老媽「馬利亞」婚前與「耶和華」上床生他。上述淫亂敗德的耶穌家女祖宗,經文卻讚說
他瑪有『義』(創38:26),喇合有『信』(書6:25、來11:31),路得有愛、有順服(得1:16-17),拔示巴有『望』(撒下11:27)馬利亞集『信』、『望』、『愛』於一身,她是一個有恩典蒙大恩的「義人」,真是噁心
約翰福音2:1-11耶穌說:婦人(即叫他母親馬利亞為老太婆),我與你有什麼相干?我的時候還沒有到。
耶穌不認自已母親,只叫馬利亞是「婦人」(大概是他老母與人通姦,經文中他被族人認為不是純種伯拉罕後代而產生自卑)
第二世紀猶太教的教士西緬拉比(R. Shimeon ben Azzai)論及耶穌時說:「此人乃淫
婦所生的私生子
=============
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案2.~聖靈充滿的神棍與童女生子關係
舊約中的先知、使者、神人(業即是被鬼魔附身的靈媒、巫覡),向來被猶太人當神看,如與雅各摔角的人,也被當成是神~~~創世紀32章:只剩雅各一人,有一個人來和他摔跤直到天明 那人見自己勝不過他,就將他的大腿窩摸了一把,雅各的大腿窩正在摔跤的時候就扭 了。
那人說:天黎明了,容我去吧!雅各說:你不給我祝福,我就不容你去。
那人說:你名叫什麼?他說:我名叫雅各。
那人說你的名字不要叫雅各,要改名叫以色列,因與神較力都得了勝。 雅各問他說:請將你的名告訴我。那人說:何必問我的名?於是在那裡給雅各祝福。
雅各便給那地方起名叫毘努伊勒【就是神之面的意思】,意思說:我面對面見了神(附體的靈媒、巫覡),我的性命仍得保全。
太3:16 ~耶穌受了洗,隨即從水裡上來。天忽然為他開了,他就看見神的靈彷彿鴿子降下,落在他身上(成鬼附的乩身了)。
徒13:9 掃羅又名保羅,被聖靈充滿(即被鬼附身起乩了)
----------
從經文上看出,被邪魔耶和華附體的靈媒神棍,猶太人是當成神看的!又如與女兒搞亂倫的「羅得」會見的那二個先知、天使,也就是當神了。
可知這馬利亞是被一猶太教神棍以神的名意誘姦,無知的少女馬利亞在誤認神棍是神時,就自動脫光光獻身給姦淫,下種懷孕了!而後來的耶穌也以其母馬利亞為恥,不曾認她是媽,只認她是不相干的「婦人」,耶穌被當是神子(舊約神的兒子很多),都是後代的愚蠢信徒搞來的!而處女生子更是笑話,所謂處女是錯譯在古猶太文字是指女性,當時中亞各宗教神話都自稱是處女生子,另有人指出搞處女生子的,不過是男的銀槍,超短小且會早洩在女體外。
----------
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案3.大淫婦耶穌
在異象裡,約翰看見這14萬4000人跟綿羊羔(耶穌)一起站在錫安山上。「他們是從人類當中買來的,是獻給上帝和綿羊羔的最早收成。」(啟14:1,4))耶和華把這群會眾賜給他的兒子做「新娘」(林後11:2;弗5:21-32;啟21:2)
林後11:2
我為你們起的憤恨,原是神那樣的憤恨。因為我曾把你們許配一個丈夫,要把你們如同貞潔的童女處女膜,獻給基督(按:女的被耶姦淫,男的被開後門菊花)。
啟21:2 我又看見聖城新耶路撒冷由神那裡從天而降,預備好了,就如新婦妝飾整齊,等候丈夫。
抨:信徒被接上天堂後,原來是被安排要與耶穌來一腿,怪不得耶穌會說在天國裡沒有嫁娶,原來不論男女上天堂都要被他姦淫一番,也上天國
===========
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案4.信仰基督教愈虔誠的國家,社會狀況愈糟糕
英國泰晤士報
Times Online, UK
Sep. 27, 2005
宗教通信記者
Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent
www.timesonline.co.uk
*********************************************
今日出爐的學術研究報告指出,基督宗教信仰會導至社會傷害,提昇更高的謀殺、墮胎,性雜交與自殺率!
依照這研究報告,信仰與敬拜基督教的上帝,不但對社會健康是多餘的且實際上更會製造許多的社會問題!
一般基督教信仰者相信他們的宗教是必要的,且是提供健康社會的道德與倫理的基礎。
這研究是拿大部份國民相信是神創造世界的美國,與非宗教化(即較世俗化)如英國這類相信達爾文演化論的國家的社會表現相較;研究顯示,這類基督宗教信仰不但不能促進社會道德提高反而是禍害的根源!
而美國許多保守的基督教福音派也相信達爾文主義是惡魔,
會鼓吹無神論與不道德。而一般人則相信宗教信仰會提高道德性,對社會有益!
這報告在美國的 『宗教與社會Journal of Religion and Society學術期刊發行。
許多美國人誤信,會上教堂的國民是最優秀的,會受上帝的祝福;他們在愈來愈多的宗教懷疑論者前,就像一座會閃閃發光的小山城!
一般而言,愈相信與崇拜基督教的富有民主國家,愈有高比率的~『殺人犯、 青少年與初為成年人的死亡、性傳染病例、十幾歲少女懷孕與墮胎』
美國幾乎是已開發中國家最多不正常現象的,特別引人注目!保羅葛列格里Gregory Paul是社會科學家與這研究論文作者,他引用國際間的蓋洛普與 ISSP (the International Social Survey Programme)與其他研究單位資料,
參考社會指標如謀殺率、墮胎、自殺、少女懷孕。得到這結論!
這研究結論是基督徒多的民主美國有較高謀殺率,而愈是信教不虔的世俗化民主國家愈少社會不正常。又以淋病而言,美國青少年的發生率是信教不虔的民主國家的300倍,同時梅毒在美國的青少年與成人感染率、與少女的墮胎率也是最高的!
保羅說如英國這較世俗化國家,在社會指標方面,較美國這基督教國家好太多了 。
同時法國、日本、斯堪的納維亞(Scandinavian)等世俗化國家更是成功的減少 謀殺率、早死、性病傳染、墮胎。
他說依這些不同研究累積來的證據,顯示基督宗教勢力實際促成社會病態;歐洲人也察覺他們愈來愈被不正常社會現況的基督教美國排斥。
除非達爾文的演化論在美國被推翻,神的存在能被證明,基督教才有可能更宗教化,同樣,除非美國宗教信仰退燒,演化論才會受多數人支持。
現這非宗教性,支持演化論的世俗化的民主國家已能提出反駁論證,表明社會不需信仰基督宗教,狀況反會更好!
原標題
Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health withPopular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies
--------
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案5.教人撒謊為榮的宗教
基督徒最喜作假見證,許多名人科學家如愛因斯坦、愛迪生、居里夫人..
.都被造假或被提出假數據偽稱是虔誠信教的基督徒,因為他們的經典教導他們作偽證以為光榮
腓1:18 這有何妨呢?或是假意,或是真心,無論怎樣,基督究竟被傳開了。為此,我就歡喜,並且還要歡喜;
大家應救救這些長年被矇騙的可憐無知信徒
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案6.外扯博愛的神棍耶穌,卻是不容異已,教導徒要殺光燒死不信他的人
殺人為樂的耶和華舊約統計殺了異已者270萬(不含洪水滅全球)而耶穌也有同一主張
路加福音
19:27不要我耶穌作他們的王的那些敵人,把他們帶來,在我面前殺掉吧!
馬太福音
12:32凡說話干犯人子的、還可得赦免.惟獨說話干犯耶和華聖靈的、今世來世總不得赦免
馬太福音
25:41你們這被咒詛的人、離開我耶穌、進入那為魔鬼和他的使者所豫備的永火裡去。
約翰福音
3:36信子耶穌的人有永生;不信子的人得不著永生,神的震怒常在他身上。
約翰福音
15:6人若不常在我耶穌裡面,就像枝子丟在外面枯幹,人拾起來,扔在火裡燒了。」
耶穌教教導要人鬥爭自已親人
路12:49 我來要把火丟在地上,倘若已經著起來,
不也是我所願意的嗎?你們以為我來,
是叫地上太平嗎?我告訴你們,不是,乃是叫人紛爭。
從今以後,一家五個口將要互鬥:三個人和兩個人,
兩個人和三個人需鬥爭;父親和兒子,
兒子和父親要鬥的你死我活;母親和女兒,
女兒和母親要互鬥為樂;婆婆和媳婦,
媳婦和婆婆要批鬥為榮。(紅色馬劣鬥爭大會就是學自早期基督教的教導)
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
7預言落空(只選幾件)
1/創28:13:「我要將你現在所躺臥之地賜給你(雅各)」。~雅各後來沒有得到此地。
2/耶34:4-5:「耶和華論到你(西底家)如此說:你必不被刀劍殺死,你必平安而死」。~結果呢?巴比倫王在西底家面前殺死他的眾子,剜去他的眼睛,將他囚禁至死(同書52:10-11)
3/耶42:17:「(猶太人)凡定意要進入埃及在那裡定居的,必遭刀劍、饑荒、瘟疫而死,無一人存留」。~猶太人後來在埃及的阿力山大里亞定居、成立了一個文化中心,直至現在。
4/耶33:17:「大衛永不斷人坐在以色列家的寶座上。」~實際上自西底家亡國起,大衛家族的統治斷了450年。還有,現在誰人是以色列的國王? 按現今以色列的國父「戴維·本-古裡安(David Ben-Gurion」竟還是一個禪宗佛教徒
5/申33:23「拿弗他利……可以得西方和南方為業……」~結果他得的是北方。
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案8.猶太先知的薩滿教巫覡身份
薩滿性的耶穌教的神棍是讓鬼魔之靈附身讓自已有點超自然能力(另一類型如道教類的則需用符咒附體,事後用符可退靈),附身後就會有:治病、下咒、趕鬼、給食、眼通、說靈語(各國方言)、觀落陰...等各種特異功能或障眼魔術
咒術:有一次,耶穌為了滿足污鬼的請求,竟把污鬼趕進約2000頭豬的身體裡,導致它們全部闖下山崖,投入大海而死(可5:12-13豬何罪之有?),令人觸目驚心!又有一次,耶穌在早晨回城的時候餓了,在路旁正好看見一棵無花果樹,但在樹上沒有找到果子(因為不到生果季節),於是詛咒那棵樹,使它立刻乾枯而死。「早晨回城的時候,他餓了,看見路旁有一棵無花果樹,就走到跟前; 在樹上找不著甚麼,不過有葉子,就對樹說:『從今以後,你永不結果子!』那無花果樹就立刻枯乾了。」(太21:18-19)馬可福音11章特別告訴我們,那不是收無花果樹的時候,但耶穌居然因為肚子餓就咒詛一顆無花果樹死!!
鬼通:約翰4:耶穌說:你去叫你丈夫也到這裡來。
婦人說:我沒有丈夫。耶穌說:你說沒有丈夫是不錯的。
你已經有五個丈夫,你現在有的並不是你的丈夫。你這話是真的。
婦人說:先生,我看出你是先知.....基督(把通鬼靈的耶穌當神看了)。
搞魔術: 如水變酒,變麵包和魚飽食五千人等古代魔幻
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案9:性侵宗教
美四成修女曾受神父性侵
報告遭隱瞞6年 涉及神父修女神職人員(6/1/2013)
【明報專訊】美國《聖路易郵報》週日援引一份被刻意隱瞞達6年的獨立調查報告 ,揭露全美有多達四成修女曾遭受神父性侵,教宗現也公開承認,而一些個案更涉及神父、修女及其他神職人員。事件勢令已備受戀童醜聞衝擊的羅馬天主教更雪上加霜。
擔心醜聞鬧大不敢公開
這項全國調查由聖路易大學研究人員受數名天主教修女委託進行,早於1996年已完成,但由於有神職人員擔心醜聞鬧大並遭外界大肆渲染,研究人員遂應一個女 性宗教團體要求未向主流媒體公開,直至最近報告才落入《 聖路易郵報 》手上。
調查推斷,全美「至少」有34000名修女曾受過各種程度性侵害,而大部分受害者都受過高等教育 ,逾九成至少有大學程度 。
。至於非洲,拉丁美洲那些落伍窮困地區的修女,為了陞官或保住職位吃飯,更不用說幾乎都是樂於被神父破處的羞女
大量強姦小孩:
2012年統計,從2002年起,光在美國被抓被告的天主教神父就7000人,被性侵小孩至少32萬以上,全球至少數百萬;而另一方面基督教的新教,據美三大保險公司統計也有同樣數量的基督教牧師性侵教徒,只因數量不像天主教的集中,且會私下花錢買保險付錢和解而較少引人注意。
在歐洲各地光是在愛爾蘭一地,被基督教教牧姦淫的小孩就有三萬五千人,德國與英國各至少二萬五千,其他歐洲國家更是不能計數,光澳洲的基督教兄弟會姦淫男孩就有4444人而落後的非洲、拉丁美洲國家的女性與小孩被性侵與虐待更不說了,另據美國研究,美國基督教教牧有30%是戀童癖。與女信徒搞通姦更美名為靈性交合。
2011/03/28 23:50
天主教自2002 年起爆發神職人員大量性侵美國未成年信徒,光神父就有7000多人犯案,被害人無以計數
迄今又陸續在歐洲澳洲及各大洲發現性侵信徒的情形,更加嚴重,神職人員被控性侵信徒約數十萬,還繼續被發現及控告中。
相較於天主教神父修女的性侵醜聞上報率,基督教牧師似乎少許多,但今日有保險公司報告指出,其實基督教牧師的性侵事件並不少於天主教,報導如下!
2011年3月22日
三家保險公司~:教會互助 Church Mutual保險有限公司,GuideOne保險有限公司和Brotherhood互助保險有限公司,是美國大多數基督教教會投保保險的主要的公司,依他們三家公司的數據,多年來每年約有260或333個未滿18歲的年輕人遭受牧師、教會工作人員,志工或組織成員性侵害。消息自: pinoyexchange.com新教的人數只能概括,因為教派不像天主教教會那麼集中,事實上,許多會堂成員是獨立的,這使得報告不容易收集。
最大的教會互助保險公司(Church Mutual Insurance Co),報告說在過去的十年,他們公司每年平均要處理約100件涉及性侵未成年人的案子。 The 「AP」 reported on 8/09 that sex abuse claims by Protestant clergy reported by Church Mutual, GuideOne, and Brotherhood Mutual amounted to almost 260 reports each year. The annual average of complaints by Catholic clergy revealed an average of 228 「credible accusations」. Bottom line, theres no denominational boundaries with sexual abuse. As Jenkins writes, 「The story of clerical abuse is bad enough without turning it into an unjustifiable of religious bigotry against the Catholic Church.」
客戶規模只有教會互助保險公司一半的 GuideOne保險公司說,過去二十年他們每年平均要處理160 件性侵未成年人的案件, 另兄弟互助保險公司說過去十五年來每年平均要處理73件兒童性侵和其他不當性行為問題。
不過,兄弟互助公司沒指明不滿18 歲的受害人數目,所以無法精確的加入計算在未成年受性侵人數內。
GuideOne 保險公司損害賠償總法律顧問兼高級副總裁湯姆法爾Tom Farr說,大多數性侵個案,法庭會下令私下解決。
他說,賠償金可以從數百萬美元下降到只支付受害者法律顧問服務費用。
迄今新教教會所涉及的案件中,其中一個最大的調解案是德州前路德會牧師Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr陪審團判賠將近3700萬美元。另外早期處理有關Thomas案也花了額外費用3200萬美元
以上統計的基督教牧師性侵案,光三家保險公司每年平均就達333件,其他的保險公司並未計算在內。若估算在內其與天主教幾乎不相上下,甚或超過!
基督家族原來是姦淫世家!耶穌身邊就備有馬利亞妓女,以便不時姦淫之需
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案10:再婚就是通姦?
(神棍)耶穌說男女離婚再嫁娶就是犯了通姦罪(按,簡直如中國禮教吃人,不通人性之至,男女情意不合,已不相愛,或相恨了,難道終生要當活死人痛苦一輩子?,難怪英國王儲查理王子與王妃黛安娜因不能離婚,各自暗中搞通姦)
路16:18~~~娶被休之妻的也是犯通姦。
可10:12~妻子若離棄丈夫另嫁,也是犯通姦了。(莫名其妙!)
照美國人的離婚率,初婚的離婚有50%再婚離異有67%,第三次婚姻離婚的有74%,至於一般婚外情通姦率,阿爾弗雷德‧金賽在他的研究發現,美國50%的男性和26%的女性在其一生中至少有一次婚外性行為。",而基督教教牧搞通姦的有30% 看來該立法,讓這些離婚且淫亂的基督徒入獄才對
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案11:種族主義
耶穌也同耶和華鼓吹猶太種族主義,(猶太人和古埃及人一樣原是黑人種),他大罵來為自已女兒求醫治的外邦迦南(按羅馬時當已沒有迦南之名)婦人是狗,只能吃他們猶太人桌上掉下的食物碎渣(可憐信基督數典忘祖的外邦華人也都成髒狗)。
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案12:教主自搞同性戀,卻要燒死同志
耶穌有幾個最愛的門徒,頭竟自動依靠耶穌的胸懷講話,可見他們是搞同性戀的教團
約13:23 有一個門徒,是耶穌所愛的,側身挨近耶穌的懷裡。西門彼得點頭對他說:你告訴我們,主是指著誰說的。那門徒便就勢靠著耶穌的胸膛,問他說:主啊,是誰呢(噁心嗎?)?
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案13只要信不可問是否理性
歷史上基督徒燒、殺、淫、虐、詐、盜、奪、掠、拐、坑、蒙、騙....無惡不作,馨竹難書。
愚蠢基督徒迷信這種邪教,難怪個個都會漸漸心理戀態,理智賤殘
基督教很不幸有個教導信徒不要守道德戒律,只信耶穌就好的保羅,怪不得教徒道德低落
加3:11 沒有一個人靠著律法在神面前稱義,這是明顯的;因為經上說,義人必因信得生。
在羅馬七章他承認,他無法遵守關於貪婪的誡命,他說:『只是非藉律法,我就不知何為罪;非律法說,『不可起貪心,』我就不知何為貪心。然而罪藉著誡命得著機會,叫諸般的貪心在我裡面發動。』(7下~8上。)~這種就是不修禪定智慧,也不守戒律,自動約束自我作賤的宗教
大家上GOOGLE網查pastor abuse或clergy abuse或pastor sex或priest abuse每一項幾乎都有好幾千萬件基督教教牧性侵記錄,就是查新聞事件,每天也都有新出的神父牧師涉及性侵案件而被告。
1979年諾貝爾獎得主,美國的 理論物理學家Steven Weinberg
在1999年一次華府演講中說:「有些宗教侮辱人類的尊嚴,無論有沒有宗教,好人還是會循規蹈矩,壞人則會繼續做出邪惡之事;但要好人幹壞事—那只需讓他信基督教就行」,他後來又補齊講稿說:
『身為奴隸的廢奴主義者「弗雷德里克·道格拉斯(Frederick Douglass)在他的親身故事中,述說他的奴隸主人,在皈依基督教後,順理成章認為奴隸制度有理,只因聖經認為他們是被咀咒的「含」的後代,做為「含」的後代的黑人只是野獸他們被懲罰是非常合理的,因而讓他更加倍被奴役,體質變的更差;另著名的作家馬克吐溫說,他的母親可說是真正的好人,心裡甚至可以同情撒旦,但她卻認為擁有奴隸是合法的,因為她長年生活在南北戰爭前的中西部的密蘇里州,她從未聽聞過牧師講道時會反對奴隸制度,卻聽到數不清的牧師講說,奴隸制度是上帝的旨意;』
他的結論:『無論有沒有宗教,好人還是會循規蹈矩,壞人則會繼續做出邪惡之事;但要讓好人幹壞事 — 那只需讓他信基督教就行』
永生之神的真相~goo.gl/isqrzP
檢視基督教:goo.gl/c3u8D7
基督教要聞:goo.gl/OLWj3V
基督教性侵醜聞:goo.gl/MOv8bt
基督教見證真偽:goo.gl/B6tPLr
小心你的家人:
https://goo.gl/7CisQT
https://goo.gl/AP6Wp2
https://goo.gl/4RN9Gb
https://goo.gl/lT4ejv
==============
認清「耶穌教」的真面目
檔案14吹牛、無智、低能邪神真面目之1
1.面對埃及大帝國,號稱萬軍耶和華,萬王之王、全知全能的神,竟不敢召惹埃及,啟動正面武力摘攖其鋒,反以三寸不爛之舌,極力鼓動,煽惑猶太蠻族,學宵小半夜出亡,最後這些聽其言信其能,逃出埃及200多萬中的60多萬猶太蠢青年,在沙漠裡,像無主遊魂似的盲盪40年,最後除二人外,竟全數命喪黃泉,當年夢想到迦南流奶與蜜地方享福,至死前才知完全為邪神耶和華所騙。
出3:8~我下來是要救他們脫離埃及人的手,領他們出了那地,到美好、寬闊、流奶與蜜之地,就是到迦南人、赫人、亞摩利人、比利洗人、希未人、耶布斯人之地。
民2:32~這些以色列人,照他們的宗族,按他們的軍隊,在諸營中被數的,共有六十萬零三千五百五十名。,但被數的人中,沒有一個是摩西和祭司亞倫從前在西乃的曠野所數的以色列人,因為耶和華論到他們說:他們必要死在曠野。所以,除了耶孚尼的兒子迦勒和嫩的兒子約書亞以外,連一個人也沒有存留。
2.這位邪神,遇見有鐵車的迦南人竟打不過!所謂全能大神,看來也不過爾爾可笑!
書17:18 山地也要歸你,雖是樹林,你也可以砍伐;靠近之地必歸你。迦南人雖有鐵車,雖是強盛,你也能把他們趕出去(按:住山上的人少)。 (講大話在先)
士1:19 耶和華與猶大同在,猶大就趕出山地的居民,只是不能趕出平原的居民,因為他們有鐵車。(MY GOD!有鐵車就打不過!真漏氣)
3.神打不過人
創世紀32章
只剩雅各一人,有一個人(應是神所附身的靈媒)來和他摔跤直到天明 那人見自己勝不過他,就將他的大腿窩摸了一把,雅各的大腿窩正在摔跤的時候就扭 了。
那人說:天黎明了,容我去吧!雅各說:你不給我祝福,我就不容你去。
那人說:你名叫什麼?他說:我名叫雅各。
那人說你的名字不要叫雅各,要叫以色列,因與神較力都得了勝。 雅各問他說:請將你的名告訴我。那人說:何必問我的名?於是在那裡給雅各祝福。
雅各便給那地方起名叫毘努伊勒【就是神之面的意思】,意思說:我面對面見了神,我的性命仍得保全。
4:這種下三濫的邪神,二次指示以色列人要攻打便雅憫人,結果反被殺了四萬人,迷信邪神的後果就是如此。
利未人中有一個人與妾跑到便雅憫人住的基比亞處夜宿,當時的風俗,外人是不能留在當地過夜的,所以他的妾被人強姦死了,這利未人不甘心回以色列
以色列人派兵要報仇,要基比亞人交出兇手但不為對方答應,以色列人就起來,到伯特利去求問神說:我們中間誰當首先上去與便雅憫人爭戰呢﹖耶和華指示說:猶大當先上去。結果便雅憫人就從基比亞出來,當日殺死以色列人二萬二千。
以色列人彼此奮勇,仍在頭一日擺陣的地方又擺陣。
未擺陣之先,以色列人上去,又在耶和華面前哭號,直到晚上,求問耶和華說:我們再去與我們弟兄便雅憫人打仗可以不可以﹖耶和華說:可以上去攻擊他們。
第二日,以色列人就又上前攻擊便雅憫人。
便雅憫人也在這日從基比亞出來,與以色列人接戰,又殺死他們一萬八千,都是拿刀的。
以色列眾人就上到伯特利,坐在耶和華面前哭號,當日禁食直到晚上。
(按;這種就是信徒口中的全能神?)
5這位發瘋顛會降瘟害人的瘟神,竟然要猶太人去投降後來他口中咒罵的大淫婦巴比倫帝國,要他們當70年巴比倫人的奴隸,這~這像話嗎?全能全知的大神?~
耶利米書:耶利米在耶和華殿中說的這些話,祭司、先知與眾民都聽見了。
耶和華:[[無論哪一邦哪一國,不肯服事這巴比倫王尼布甲尼撒,也不把頸項放在巴比倫王的軛下,我必用刀劍、饑荒、瘟疫刑罰那邦,直到我藉巴比倫王的手將他們毀滅。這是耶和華說的。至於你們,不可聽從你們的先知和占卜的、圓夢的、觀兆的,以及行邪術的;他們告訴你們說:你們不致服事巴比倫王』(按:有人說這耶利米可能是巴比倫派出的間諜)
6。.再翻看猶太人過去信拜邪神,獲得的代價,竟是幾千年來都是當奴隸過活命份,除長期來被全體歐州人基督徒與中東伊斯蘭教徒迫害外,二次世界大戰600萬人還被德國及歐洲各地的基督徒天主教徒活活毒死在煤氣室,境遇是多麼悽慘,再說耶和華的聖殿至今只剩一面哭牆,這種神的無能還真奇妙!
7.要人拜石頭望銅蛇
民21:9 『於是耶和華使火蛇進入百姓中間,蛇就咬他們。以色列人中死了許多。、、、
耶和華對摩西說:你製造一條火蛇,掛在桿子上;凡被咬的,一望這蛇,就必得活。摩西便製造一條銅蛇,掛在桿子上;凡被蛇咬的,一望這銅蛇就活了』(民21:6、8、9)
王下18:4 他(希西家)廢去邱壇,毀壞柱像,砍下木偶,打碎摩西所造的銅蛇,因為到那時以色列人仍向銅蛇燒香。希西家叫銅蛇為銅像
撒迦利亞書
萬軍之耶和華如此說:大祭司約書亞啊,你和坐在你面前的同伴都當聽。我必使我僕人大衛的苗裔發出。看哪,我在約書亞面前所立的石頭,在一塊石頭上有七眼。萬軍之耶和華說:我要親自雕刻這石頭,並要在一日之間除掉這地的罪孽(原來石頭也可除罪)
萬軍之耶和華說:.....大山哪,你算什麼呢﹖在所羅巴伯面前,你必成為平地。他必搬出一塊石頭,安在殿頂上。人且大聲歡呼說:願恩惠恩惠歸與這石頭! (明顯的鼓勵拜認石頭為神)
賽2:8 他們的地滿了偶像;他們跪拜自己手所造的,就是自己指頭所做的
賽45:16 凡製造偶像的都必抱愧蒙羞,都要一同歸於慚愧
耶10:14 各人都成了畜類,毫無知識;各銀匠都因他雕刻的偶像羞愧。他所鑄的偶像本是虛假的,其中並無氣息,
啟9:20 其餘未曾被這些災所殺的人仍舊不悔改自己手所做的,還是去拜鬼魔和那些不能看、不能聽、不能走,金、銀、銅、木、石的偶像,
結18:6 人若是公義,且行正直與合理的事,未曾仰望以色列家的偶像,未曾玷污鄰舍的妻,未曾在婦人的經期內親近他
按罵人拜偶像,嘲笑人家的造的偶像是不能看、不能聽、不能走,結果自已要人拜望銅蛇與石頭,自打嘴巴,好不好笑,
更何況現今天主教拜淫婦馬利亞,基督教拜十字架與耶穌這些偶像,還四處拍照照相(十戒說不能造自已的形像)
8、講到歐洲中古社會為何被史學家定位為『中古黑暗世紀』?還不是人民因在教會鬼魔武力統治下過著被剝削、虐待、毒害、迷信的生活,就知現代基督教徒他們拜的神根本是惡魔瘟神,黑死病全歐洲就死了1/3人口,那來『信耶穌必得平安』的鬼話 。再者他們吹噓的科學是他們才有的,更是可笑,查13世紀前他們迫害當時的科學家並焚燒所有的圖書館,直到他們在西班牙打敗回教徒,在圖書館裡獲知有希臘羅馬時期如亞里斯德的有關科學的學術,於是在一些不信教的人主動研究下才漸漸發展成今日的科學學術,基督徒原是末日教派,只有等世界毀滅,等約穌下凡來救而已,但2000多年了,才知約穌不過是騙子神棍,那會來救!
9.有人統計這瘟神耶和華在有帳面上共殺278萬人,而那些被他以洪水淹死的人類,真無法計數
如:
出9:3 耶和華的手加在你田間的牲畜上,就是在馬、驢、駱駝、牛群、羊群上,必有重重的瘟疫
撒下24:15 於是,耶和華降瘟疫與以色列人,自早晨到所定的時候;從但直到別是巴,民間死了七萬人。。(殺人魔哩!)
耶21:7 以後我要將猶大王西底家和他的臣僕百姓,就是在城內,從瘟疫、刀劍、饑荒中剩下的人,都交在巴比倫王尼布甲尼撒的手中和他們仇敵,並尋索其命的人手中。巴比倫王必用刀擊殺他們,不顧惜,不可憐,不憐憫。這是耶和華說的。
10.惡人殘障災難都是他造的
賽54:16 吹噓炭火、打造合用器械的鐵匠是我所造;殘害人、行毀滅的惡棍也是我所造。
出4:11 耶和華對他說:誰使人口啞、耳聾、眼瞎呢﹖豈不是我─耶和華嗎﹖
耶穌走過時看見一個人生來是瞎眼的。
門徒問耶穌說:拉比,這人生來是瞎眼的,是誰犯了罪﹖是這人呢﹖是他父母呢﹖
耶穌回答說:也不是這人犯了罪,也不是他父母犯了罪,是要在他身上顯出神的作為來。
原來是無惡不做的惡神
希臘哲學家伊壁鳩魯說
如果是上帝想阻止「惡」而阻止不了,那麼上帝就是無能的;
如果是上帝能阻止「惡」而不願阻止,那麼上帝就是壞的;
如果是上帝既不想阻止也阻止不了「惡」,那麼上帝就是既無能又壞;
如果是上帝既想阻止又能阻止「惡」,那為什麼我們的世界充滿了「惡」呢?
檔案15
耶教聖經說信徒也是神,耶和華也會死
「我曾說:你們是神,都是至高者的兒子」(詩八十二6)。
I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
「耶穌說:你們的律法上豈不是寫著:『我曾說你們是神』麼?經上的話是不能廢的;若那些承受神道的人,尚且稱為神,父所分別為聖又差到世間來的,他自稱是神的兒子,你們還向他說:你說僭妄的話麼」(約十34~36)?
耶和華也會死;死海古卷與希臘文譯本揭穿基督教貪渴永生是個神話!
基督教是一神教嗎?死海古卷與希臘文本揭穿耶和華實是迦南El Elyon神的兒子之一,耶和華也會死亡 ,基督教貪渴永生只是幻像!
參看申命記『 32:8-9(詹姆斯國王版本)
至高者將繼承物分賜給眾國
當他將亞當的子孫分散
就照以色列人的數目立定人民的疆界(傳說70人)
但耶和華的份就是他的子民
他的產業就是雅各(後名以色列)』
上面是基於傳統的希伯來文,也稱為馬所拉(Masoretic)文本。
現在參考一個種更古老的版本~死海古卷中所發現與之相匹配的希臘文本:
當 El Elyon神送給各國他們的繼承物
當他分散人類的子孫,
他固定眾民的邊界,根據神的兒子人數,
對於耶和華的部分是他的子民,雅各是他分配的繼承物。
這到底是怎麼回事呢?
古老的文字清楚地表明迦南地帶的El Elyon神是這地區神的父親,耶和華只是他70個兒子之一。
El Elyon神劃分不同民族並分配給耶和華一部分繼承物
後代經文竟將這兩個父子神El Elyon與耶和華合併統合為一個神,(註:顯然企圖欺矇大眾;像後來教會把耶和華與基督說成三位一體)。
另還有其他線索顯示,猶太教原是多神教,
以詩篇82為例:
82:0 亞薩的詩。
82:1 神站在眾神的會中;在諸神中行審判,
82:2 說,你們審判不秉公義,徇惡人的情面,要到幾時呢?
82:3 你們當為貧寒的人和孤兒伸冤,為困苦和貧窮的人施行公理;
82:4 當救護貧寒和窮乏的人,搭救他們脫離惡人的手。
82:5 他們不知道,也不明白,他們正在黑路中走;地的根基都搖動了。
82:6 我曾說,你們是神,你們中的每一個,都是至高者Elyon的兒子。
82:7 然而,你們與人類一樣要死;像宗王中的一個要仆倒。
82:8 神阿,求你興起,審判這地;因為你曾繼承所有國家。
在舊約還有許多文字提及「其他眾神」,在舊約許多由耶和華所發的咆哮似乎顯示他只是地位略高於其他眾神,這些神應如耶和華般,得到至高者 El Elyon神配給土地。
一些文獻也可參考,古代是多神教,邪和華只是眾神中的以色列民族的神而已
(文見最底下附件英文原稿一)
檔案16~反科學荒誕不經的基督教天地觀
之一
經常在網路看到基督徒振振有辭說他們的上帝創造天地,但試問一下他們上帝造的天地是什麼樣子的時侯,就結結巴巴答不出,或者以現今教科書的概念述說
,等到我們拿出實際的圖示給他們時,就張口結舌,瞬間藉故企圖離開或移轉話題。
圖片搜尋結果
猶太人的宇宙
現在讓我們來看看他們上帝造的天地是什麼樣子
你能想像天是半球形似鐵鍋蓋子,以便能分開上下二層的水嗎?
中國古代神話故事裡,天不知何故破了,於是女媧娘娘不辭辛勞煉石補天,原來中國古人相信天是硬的物件。
基督教信仰裡也認為天(英文:firmament)是堅硬有如鍋蓋子的硬物。
證據如下:
伯37:18 你豈能與神同鋪天(firmament)(或譯:穹蒼 )嗎﹖而這天(firmament)堅硬,如同鑄成的鏡子(註:意指天(firmament)被鑄的很光亮)
探究英文firmament的意義與語源,firmament語源來自firmly這字,
在希臘文是薄金屬板或硬物的意思
美國韋氏大典firmament註解為: the vault(圓拱形) or arch(呈拱形覆蓋的天空) of the sky : HEAVENS
也就是指硬物件的圓拱形天空,以白話說就像家中煮飯用的半球形鐵鍋蓋子
箴8:28 上使天(firmament)堅硬,下使淵源穩固,
(註:看到吧,天是堅硬的)。
詩104:2 鋪張天(firmament),如鋪幔子,(註:天如幔子可被舖展開)
展開諸天如可住的帳棚(猶太人認為天有三層,後來受希臘人影向認為有七層)
賽42:5 創造諸天,鋪張穹蒼(firmament),將地和地所出的一併鋪開
------------------------
天是用來分上下二層水用的
參考:
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of
the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters
創1:6 神說:諸水之間要有空氣(firmament(即:天))將水分為上下。
(註:有些教會的翻譯本,如上面的中文和合版本譯文,為欺矇不知情信眾
,竟將天(firmament)無恥翻譯為空氣,以符合現代科學)
創1:7 :神就造出天(firmament),將天(firmament)以下的水、
天(firmament)以上的水分開了。事就這樣成了。
創1:8 神稱(firmament)為天。有晚上,有早晨,是第二日
(按:猶太人以為太陽月亮星星被神掛在天鍋蓋子下,繞著蓋子轉動,而有早晚之分),
============
基督教的天地描述
Biblical Conception of the Universe
iverse.htm
1.天蓋子上有水(創世紀1:7)
2.有雪窗(約伯書38;22)
3. 冰雹窗(約伯38;22)
4.有風箱(約伯37:9)
5.有天的鍋蓋子(創世紀1;6)
6.天上有水閘(創世紀7:11)
7.天有柱子(約伯26:11)
8.地有柱子(詩篇104:5)
9.地底中央有深噴泉(創世紀7:11)
10.地的中央是火湖地獄(士師記9:37)
And Gaal spake again and said, See there come people
down by the middle of the land, and another company come
along by the plain of Meonenim.
迦勒又說:看哪,有人從地的中央來,又有一隊從米惡尼尼橡樹的路上而來。
11.地底水(出埃及記20:4)
-----------------------
你相信天會被捲起,好像書卷嗎?
賽34:4 天上的萬象都要消沒;天被捲起,好像書卷。其上的萬像要殘敗
,像葡萄樹的葉子殘敗,又像無花果樹的葉子殘敗一樣
註:大家都知道所謂天,不過是大虛空,竟能像書卷般被捲起,實在好笑!
-----------------------
天竟會震動?
賽13:13 我─萬軍之耶和華在忿恨中發烈怒的日子,必使天震動,離其本位。
---------------
更好笑的是~日頭月亮可停在天空,停一日不動:
· 約書亞書10: 當耶和華將亞摩利人交付以色列人的日子,約書亞就禱告耶和華
,在以色列人眼前說:日頭啊,你要停在基遍;月亮啊,你要止在亞雅崙谷。
於是日頭停留,月亮止住,直等國民向敵人報仇。這事豈不是寫在雅煞珥書上嗎﹖
日頭在天當中停住,不急速下落,約有一日之久。在這日以前,這日以後,耶和華聽人的禱告,沒有像這日的,是因耶和華為以色列爭戰。
-----------
使星星不發光?使日頭黑暗。月亮原來會發光?
賽13:10 天上的眾星群宿都不發光,日頭一出就變黑暗;月亮也不放光。
-----------------
太陽,月亮、星星原來是被掛在天空內
創1:17 就把這些光擺列在天空(firmament),普照在地上
(註:是指將發光的星星、太陽、月亮掛吊在天空硬的內層上,以普照大地)
===============
地的問題
您同意地是建在海面上的嗎?
詩24:2 他把地建立在海上,安定在大水之上
--------------------
地是四方有四角?
啟7:1 此後,我看見四位天使站在地的四角,執掌地上四方的風,
叫風不吹在地上、海上,和樹上
--------------------
您相信地有柱子嗎?
撒上2:8 。地的柱子屬於耶和華;他將世界立在其上。
伯9:6 他使地震動,離其本位,地的柱子就搖撼。
詩75:3 地和其上的居民都消化了;我曾立了地的柱子
-------------
註;基督徒常愛引用下面經文,宣稱地球是懸在虛空所以以論證基督教合乎現代科學
中文經文伯26:7基督教譯為:『神將北極鋪在空中,將大地懸在虛空』
英文Job26:7: He stretcheth out the north over the empty place,
and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
但將大地懸在虛空這句的譯文是有問題的,因基督教認為地有柱子,
所以hangeth the earth upon nothing是地不用吊掛的意思!
不是懸在虛空!
================
地球是不動,太陽在天上轉
聖經說:「太陽與黑夜---在天上按時輪轉。」(耶利米三三20)
賽60:20: 你的日頭不會再下落;
歷代誌上16:30
Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable,
that it be not moved. 全地要在他面前戰抖,世界也穩固不會轉動。
詩篇93;1 the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.
世界(即地球)也穩固不能被移動
詩篇104:5Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever
立地的根基,使地永不能轉動。
-----------------
地球是平面,還是立體?
聖經說:「神坐在地球大圈(circle)之上。」
Isa40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth;
猶太人以為地是平的所以坐大圈,英文circle是圓圈,不是球體sphere
耶利米書16:19
the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth
外邦人必從地之極來到此
啟示錄7;1
我看見四位天使站在地的四角,執掌地上四方的風,叫風不吹在地上
、海上,和樹上(註:以為地球是四方形,有四個角)。
詩篇50;1
The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth
from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.
大能的神─耶和華已經發聲,呼叫從日出開始到日落為止的這片地
(註:以為地球只是一塊從日出至日落的範圍四方形地而已,而不知有各大洲)。
旦以理4:10~11
Thus were the visions of mine head in my bed; I saw, and
behold a tree in the midst of the earth, and the height
thereof was great.
The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof
reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end
of all the earth:
我在床上腦中的異像是這樣:我看見地球上當中有一棵樹,極其高大。
那樹漸長,而且堅固,高到天堂,從地球之角落都能看見
(註:以為地球是平面的)
-----------------
日影倒退?~~太陽倒退走?
賽38:8 就是叫亞哈斯的日晷,向前進的日影往後退十度。於是,
前進的日影果然在日晷上往後退了十度。
--------------
你相信天有天窗嗎?
創8:2 淵源和天上的窗戶都閉塞了,天上的大雨也止住了。
你認為天上有雪庫與雹倉嗎
伯38:22 你曾進入雪庫,或見過雹倉嗎﹖
===========
結論
基督徒說聖經裡說過「聖經都是神所默示,不會有錯」
但現在我們終於可以瞭解基督教的神所創造的天地是怎樣的荒謬可笑了
檔案17~耶穌之墓待挖
(中央社台北29日電)對1座1世紀基督教墓室進行勘察的考古學家發現,其內1個石骨盒的盒蓋上刻有古代的銘文,他們認為這可能證明,此地正是耶穌基督的長眠處。
英國「每日郵報」(Daily Mail)報導,對1座1世紀基督教墓室進行勘察的考古學家發現,其內1個石骨盒的盒蓋上刻有古代銘文,他們認為可能是耶穌基督的長眠處。
英國「每日郵報」(Daily Mail)報導,這些考古學家將遙控相機固定在機械臂上,對耶路撒冷1棟高層建築物下方進行探查,結果驚訝地發現了一些1世紀的「骨盒」。這些以石灰岩製成的骨盒中,有1個盒蓋上刻有希臘文,意為「天主耶和華,讓祂復活吧,讓祂復活吧」。
另一副盒蓋繪有1條魚,魚嘴有人物線條畫,據信這描繪的是基督教最初的故事「約拿與鯨魚」(Jonah and the Whale)。
在距此一地點200呎外,有1座先前即已發現的「耶穌與家人墓」,在1980年代發現後,引起了許多爭議。
當時考古學家宣稱,墓內有骨盒,盒上刻有耶穌家人的名字。
這個發現引起了令人難以置信的猜測,比如有人堅稱,耶穌和抹大拉的馬利亞(Mary Magdalene)就葬在這座墓內,而兩人曾結婚,共組家庭。
這座耶穌與家人墓在勘察不久後,即遭到信奉基督教東正教的猶太人抗議,指此舉擾亂墓室安寧,結果挖掘工作叫停。其後被封起,上面蓋起了1座高樓。
然而美國北卡羅來納大學聖經學者塔波(James Tabor)和紀錄片製作人賈科波維奇(Simcha Jacobovici)決心繼續研究。
他們2010年取得以色列政府允許,使用機械臂鑽洞,以勘察耶穌與家人墓四周範圍,結果發現了另1個墓室,他們將此稱為「露台墓」,因其幾乎位於建築物露台的正下方。
這2人就是在露台墓內,發現上述銘文。他們宣稱,這段銘文使「耶穌與家人墓」就是耶穌長眠處的可能性大增。(譯者:中央社張佑之)1010301
==============
檔案18 耶穌墓見證耶穌娶妻生子?
華夏經緯網
根據《聖經》傳說,耶穌死後三天復活,僅留空墓一座。然而丹·布朗的《達·芬奇密碼》則通過一個個密碼解密後顯示:耶穌曾娶妻生子。這部影片和 原著因此均受到強烈批評和質疑。但現在,一部紀錄片將這一秘密再次提起———由影片《泰坦尼克號》導演詹姆斯·卡梅隆攝製的紀錄片《耶穌被遺忘的墓穴》將 於3月4日上映。該片稱,多年前在耶路撒冷發現的一個古墓實際上就是耶穌家族墓室,裡面不僅埋葬了耶穌本人屍骨,還葬有很可能是耶穌妻兒的遺骸。
雖然沒有踏上奧斯卡的紅地毯,但好萊塢著名導演詹姆斯·卡梅隆在紐約的一個發佈會立刻讓全世界暫時忘記了馬丁·斯科塞斯來之不易的風頭。週一, 卡梅隆和其他幾位考古學者在紐約公共圖書館向全世界展示了兩件古代的石匣,並宣佈其中極有可能曾經盛著耶穌和妻子抹大拉的遺骸,而相關的紀錄片《耶穌被遺忘的墓穴》已經由卡梅隆攝製完成,當地時間3月4日晚上9點將在「探索頻道」播出。
1980年發現於耶路撒冷
據當日發佈會上的消息,盛有耶穌「夫婦」遺骸的石匣1980年發現於耶路撒冷郊外的一個墓穴。當時考古學共發現石匣10個,其中一個石匣上刻有一段令專家們驚訝的文字:猶大,耶穌之子。這段文字顯示,耶穌可能有一個兒子和家庭,就像1999年上映的電影《耶穌之子》一樣。詹姆斯·卡梅隆興奮地 說:「再也沒有比這更重大的事情了。」本片的另外一位導演西蒙查·雅可布維奇說,其中的一個盛骸石匣的碑銘是「MariameneeMara」———翻譯 過來就是「瑪麗是已知的主人」,而「Mariamene」可能就是傳說中耶穌的妻子「抹大拉」的真實姓名———就像丹·布朗小說《達·芬奇密碼》中那樣。
如果所發現石匣確實盛有耶穌遺骸,那將與基督教歷史和教義產生牴觸,這不啻將動搖2000多年的基督教信仰。但許多宗教人士和專家也對這一考古發現的價值和真實性表示質疑。為此,在週一的發布會上,許多考古專家和學者為這一「偉大」的考古發現展開了激烈辯論。
1980年3月28日,一位建築工人在耶路撒冷郊外一建築工地挖出一座墓穴,隨後出土了前面提到的10個石匣。據介紹,耶穌生活年代的葬俗是,先用壽衣將屍體包起來,然後放入石頭墳墓中,在腐爛一年後,再將骨頭放到一個藏屍骨的石匣中。
多位專家肯定碑銘真實性
在此次挖掘出土的10個石匣中,有5個上面標記的名字和《新約》中的關鍵人物有關,其中分別是耶穌、瑪麗、馬太、約瑟和抹大拉。有關方面稱,出土的時候石匣是空的,遺骸後來被轉移走了。
到目前為止,至少已經有多位全世界權威的碑銘專家對這些石匣上的碑銘真實性表示肯定,哈佛大學東方語言和文化系的名譽退休教授弗蘭克·克羅絲 說:「這些碑銘來自希律一世時期(大約出現在公元前1年至公元1年)。使用石灰石的藏屍匣和風格是那個時期所特有的。」美國北卡羅來納州大學宗教研究系副主任喬迪·馬格勒斯認為,除了那個「猶大,耶穌之子」的碑文,現場發現的另一個石匣上碑文「約瑟之子耶穌」也為這一發現真實性提供了證據。
除了來自古文字專家的肯定,世界上一些最重要的分子基因實驗室的DNA分析,也對這些遺骸的真實性表示肯定,更重要的是石匣中的DNA痕跡分析也證明了碑銘上的家族譜系關係。另之前也曾發掘出耶穌兄弟的骨匣
檔案19~大量偽造經文
聖經學者也發現,
約翰福音14:6『我就是道路、真理、生命;若不藉著我,沒有人能到父那裡去』
約翰福音10:30耶穌的話:「我與父原為一」
約翰福音8:58或:「耶穌說:『我實實在在地告訴你們:還沒有亞伯拉罕就有了我!
約翰福音1:1說:「道就是神。
」約翰福音1:14說:「道成了肉身。
約翰福音20:28~使徒多馬:「我的主,我的神!
約翰福音2:2如果他不是神,那麼他的死就不足以償還世人的罪債
這些,在最早的經文馬可福音都沒有的,而是從幾百年後才篇寫的約翰福音自行添造的,企圖將耶穌這神媒神化。
另馬可福音書的末段16:15至16:20以下這些話,經學家考古研究發現也是後代教會自行添加的
~
『他又對他們說:你們往普天下去,傳福音給萬民(萬民:原文是凡受造的)聽。
信而受洗的,必然得救;不信的,必被定罪。
信的人必有神蹟隨著他們,就是奉我的名趕鬼;說新方言;
手能拿蛇;若喝了什麼毒物,也必不受害;手按病人,病人就必好了。
主耶穌和他們說完了話,後來被接到天上,坐在神的右邊。
門徒出去,到處宣傳福音。主和他們同工,用神蹟隨著,證實所傳的道。阿們! 』
牛頓不信耶穌是基督,也發現16世紀,基督教的聖經添加三位一體
=================
檔案20相關網址:
永生之神的真相~goo.gl/isqrzP
檢視基督教:goo.gl/c3u8D7
基督教要聞:goo.gl/OLWj3V
基督教性聞:goo.gl/MOv8bt
基督教見證真偽:goo.gl/B6tPLr
小心你的家人:
https://goo.gl/7CisQT
https://goo.gl/AP6Wp2
https://goo.gl/4RN9Gb
https://goo.gl/lT4ejv
附件一:
Yahweh, son of El Elyon
耶和華迦按神El Elyon的兒子
http://fuzzyquark.comxa.com/gods.html
Take a look at Deuteronomy 32:8-9 (King James Version):
"When the Most High divided their inheritance to the nations, 「
When He separated the sons of Adam
He set the boundaries of the peoples
According to the number of the children of Israel.
For the LORDs portion is His people;
Jacob is the place of His inheritance." 。「
This is based on the traditional Hebrew text, otherwise known as the Masoretic text (MT).
Now look at a much older version of this text that was found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and matches the Greek Septuagint text:
"When El Elyon gave to the nations their inheritance, 「,
when he separated the sons of men,
he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.
For Yahwehs portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted inheritance." 「
What on earth is going on here?
The older text clearly shows that El Elyon is the father of all the gods, and Yahweh is simply one of his sons.
El Elyon divides up the various nations and allocates a portion to Yahweh。
The later version of the text simply merged these two gods into a single being.
There are other clues that there were originally multiple gods,
take Psalm 82 for example, where Yahweh stands in the council of the gods 但後來版本1. 1。 Psalm of Asaph.。 God stands in the council of the gods; he judges among the gods
2. 2。 How long will you judge unjustly, and show preference to the wicked?
3. 3。 Judge the poor and the orphans; do righteousness to the afflicted and dispossessed
4. 4。 Deliver the poor and oppressed; save them from the hand of the evil.
5. 5。 They do not know and they have no understanding; they walk about in darkness. All the foundations of the earth are shaken.
6. 6。 I said, 「You are gods, and children of Elyon , every one of you.」。」
7. 7。 But you will die like mortals, and fall like one of the princes.。
8. 8。 Rise up, O God, and judge the earth, for you have inherited all the nations
There are many other references to "other gods" in the Old Testament if you look carefully, have a look at my Bible Nonsense page for some examples.。 A lot of the rants by Yahweh in the Old Testament appear to be about his superiority over these other gods, presumably the ones El Elyon allocated to other lands.
==================
Yahweh was one of the Sons of El Elyon PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator
Friday, 12 August 2011 09:56
http://bewaredeception.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86:yahweh-was-one-of-the-sons-of-el-elyon&catid=1:articles&Itemid=3
Yahweh, the god of Judaism and Christianity, was in fact one of the sons of the true God El Elyon. El Elyon was the Most High God and the creator of the universe but Yahweh was one of the sons of El Elyon, who along with his other brothers received an inheritance from his Father El and was made a ruler of ancient Israel. When El Elyon, the Most High God allotted territories to the sons of Adam, He appointed one of His sons to rule over each nation and to administer His government over the nations. Please note the text of Deuteronomy 32:7-8 as it stands in the King James Bible:
「Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations: ask thy father, and he will shew thee; thy elders, and they will tell thee. When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For the LORDs portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.」
Moses states that many generations before his time, the Most High, that is, Elyon, as the Hebrew text has it, separated the descendants of Adam and therefore humanity according to their tribes and He allocated a territory to each tribe that is later referred to as a nation. Jacob, that is, Israel, was by lot allocated to the LORD, that is, Yahweh, as the Hebrew text has it. The King James Bible is based on the Hebrew masoretic text which was compiled several centuries after the birth of Jesus. That is why the text reads that Elyon divided the tribes or nations in accordance with the number of the 「children of Israel.」 However, the Jewish scribes known as masorites, corrupted the text and altered its original reading as is attested by some earlier versions of the text. Please note what the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, on page 584, art. 『sons of God has to say regarding this text:
「...the MT [masoretic text] erroneously has 「sons of Israel」 [bene yisrael], but the versions [e.g., LXX, Symm, Old Latin] and a scroll from Qumran support the reading 「sons of God」 [bene elim.]」
Then it goes on to say the following:
「In other words, the Most High assigned one of the peoples of the world to each of the divine beings in the council. As v.9 indicates, Yahwehs portion was Israel. The original notion seems to have been that Yahweh, God of Israel, stood alongside the other national gods in a council presided over by the Most High.」
The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, compiled by three outstanding Catholic scholars, on page 108, states:
「For 「sons of Israel」 read 「sons of God」 with the LXX and QL. The idea is that Elyon, high God of the Canaanite pantheon, assigned each of the 70 nations of the world [Gen 10] to one of the 70 deities of the pantheon and that Israel had the good fortune to be assigned to Yahweh.」
Now please note some versions of this text as is translated in certain English bibles and see for yourself how they resort to lies and how they corrupt the Hebrew text in order to make you believe that Yahweh is actually the Most High God and not one of the sons of the Most High who received his share along with his brothers.
「...when God divided up the world among the nations, He gave each of them a supervising angel! But he appointed none for Israel; For Israel was Gods own personal possession!」 [The Living Bible – Life Application Bible].
「...the Most High assigned nations their lands; he determined where peoples should live. He assigned to each nation a god, but Jacobs descendants he chose for himself」 [Good News Bible].
The Living Bible changed Elyon to God and Yahwehs to Gods. It also inserts the word 「own」 which does not occur in the Hebrew text and changes 『inheritance to 『possession.』 The idea here is that God the Most High appointed angels over other nations but the nation of Israel He reserved for Himself. A fancy notion indeed, but to come to that conclusion we must corrupt the Hebrew text and twist the facts. The Good News Bible also corrupts the text and says what is not in Hebrew. It conveniently omits Yahweh or LORD of the KJV so that it can present the ruler of Israel as the Most High. These translations are lies and forgeries.
The Hebrew text states that Elyon, that is, the Most High God, the creator of the universe, assigned nations to His sons by a lot. Israel was allotted to Yahweh and it became his inheritance from his Father Elyon. The bible shows in numerous places that Israel was indeed Yahwehs inheritance and that Yahweh was the god of Israel and not the god of other nations. The bible also clearly shows that other nations had other gods – the brothers of Yahweh – who ruled them. This will be documented later. There are many biblical passages which state that Israel is Yahwehs heritage and inheritance. Both words are derived from the Latin word which means 『heir.』 El Elyon, as the Most High God, never was and never will be an heir since He had no father or an ancestor from whom to inherit. Since Yahweh inherited Israel and since it was his heritage and since he was the god of Israel exclusively, it follows then that he was one of the sons of El Elyon. David obviously believed that each nation had its own god and that if he was exiled from Israel he would be exiled from the land of Yahweh and his presence and would be forced to serve a foreign god. When he was on the run from King Saul and spared his life, this is what he said to Saul:
「Your majesty, listen to what I have to say. If it is the LORD who has turned you against me, an offering to him will make him change his mind; but if men have done it, may the LORDs [Yahwehs] curse fall on them. For they have driven me out from the LORDs [Yahwehs] land to a country where I can only worship foreign gods. Dont let me be killed on foreign soil, away from the LORD [Yahweh]」 [Good News Bible 1 Samuel 26:19-20].
The Jerusalem Bible reads:
「...if Yahweh himself has incited you against me, let him accept an offering; but if men have done it, may they be accursed before Yahweh, for now they have driven me out so that I have no share in the heritage of Yahweh. They have said, 「go and serve other gods」. So now, do not let my blood fall to the ground out of the presence of Yahweh.」
In a footnote the translators say: 「to be exiled was to be outside Yahwehs territory.」
David knew that other nations were ruled by the sons of Elyon and that only the land of Israel was the heritage or inheritance of Yahweh. He believed that if he was forced into exile he would have no choice but worship the god of that foreign land. He did not want to die in a foreign land away from the jurisdiction of Yahweh. That is exactly what this passage of the bible is saying if we are honest and unbiased. Lest you think that the text is mistranslated I give you the version of the Tanakh, published by the Jewish Society:
「If the LORD has incited you against me, let Him be appeased by an offering; but if it is men, may they be accursed of the LORD! For they have driven me out today, so that I cannot have a share in the LORDs possession, but am told, 『Go and worship other gods.』 Oh, let my blood not fall to the ground, away from the presence of the LORD!」
Jephtah, regarded as hero of faith in Hebrews 11, most definitely recognised that Chemosh was an existing god and actually a legitimate god of the Ammonites. Israel annexed a territory which belonged to the Ammonites. In his letter, Jephtah explained to the king of the Ammonites why the Israelites would not return the territory. Jephtah argued that it was Yahweh who personally conquered this portion of land and then gave it to the Israelites. In this letter Jephtah acknowledged Chemosh as the great war lord and the legitimate god of the Ammonites:
「Now, then, Yahweh, the God of Israel, dispossessed the Amorites before His people Israel; and should you possess their land? Do you not hold what CHEMOSH YOUR GOD GIVES YOU TO POSSESS? So we will hold on to everything that Yahweh our God has given us to possess」 [Judges 11:23-25].
Please note how Jephtah spoke of Yahweh as 「our god」 and the 「god of Israel.」 But of Chemosh he spoke as 「your god.」 Jephtah acknowledged that the Ammonites had the right to hold onto any territory that their god Chemosh gives them just as they have the right to keep onto the territory that their god Yahweh conquers for them. Numbers 21:29 says that the Moabites were 「the people of Chemosh」 and that they were actually 「sons and daughters」 of Chemosh. The text also says that Chemosh abandoned his people and allowed them to be taken captive. Obviously because of their disobedience to him. The inscription on a Moabite Stone - the oldest Semitic writing discovered - says that Chemosh was angry with his people and allowed other nations to conquer them. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, art. Chemosh, on p. 640, says:
「What is of importance is the recurrence of so many phrases and expressions applied to Chemosh which are used of Yahweh in the Old Testament narratives. The religious conceptions of the Moabites reflected in the inscription are so strikingly like those of the Israelites that if only the name Yahweh were substituted for that of Chemosh we might think we were reading a chapter of the books of Kings.」
Jephtah, and most of other Israelites of his day believed that each nation was governed by its own national god. They believed that originally the Most High divided the nations and over each nation He appointed one of His sons to rule and take care of that nation and administer His government. The Israelites boasted about their national god and believed that he was superior to all other gods appointed over the nations. It seems that this was the case since he apparently inflicted the punishment over the gods of Egypt. Exodus 12:12 says:
「Against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgement.」
The word 「judgement」 comes from the Hebrew word 「shephet」, which actually means 「infliction, punish.」 The word 「infliction」 means 「pain, punishment.」 The word 「punish」 means 「to subject to pain.」 A mere idol of gold or stone or any other material could not be punished nor can pain be inflicted on an idol. Only the real and living gods could be punished. In Numbers 33:4 we are also told that Yahweh punished the gods of Egypt. The Jewish chronicler apparently believed that the gods of Damascus were real and powerful. He believed that these gods actually DEFEATED King Ahaz in battle. In 2 Chronicles 28:23 we read:
"He offered sacrifices to the gods of Damascus who had defeated him, for he said, "Since these gods helped the kings of Aram, they will help me, too, if I sacrifice to them." But instead, they led to his ruin and the ruin of all Judah."
Obviously king Ahaz believed that Yahweh was not the only god but this is neither here nor there. What is imperative to grasp is the fact that the author of Chronicles believed that the gods of Damascus were real since the author made a statement that these gods HAD DEFEATED king Ahaz. For them to defeat him they had to be real and for the author to make such a statement he had to believe that they were real and not just idols of gold or stone or simply an imagination of a deluded mind.
The bible clearly shows that the authors of the bible prior to the Jewish exile to Babylon believed that other gods existed but they only thought that their god Yahweh was more powerful. Please not the following passages:
Exodus 15:11:
「Who is like you, O Yahweh, among the gods?」
Exodus 18:11:
「Now I know that Yahweh is greater than all the gods.」
Deuteronomy 10:1,7:
「For Yahweh your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, great God.」
Joshua 22:22:
「Yahweh God of gods, Yahweh God of gods.」
Psalm 136:2,3:
「O give thanks to the God of gods, O give thanks to the Lord of lords.」
Psalm 97:9:
「For you o Yahweh…are exalted above all the gods.」
Psalm 95:3:
For Yahweh is a great God, and a great King above all gods.」
Psalm 86:8:
「Among the gods there is none like you.」
The authors of these passages believed that other gods existed, but at the same time that their national god was more powerful than any god of other nations. We are not talking about idols of stone or gold. It would be absurd to say that Yahweh is above all idols of stone who do not even have breath. The comparison is only valid and meaningful if other gods were living deities but not a match for Yahweh. That these gods were living gods and not a mere idols or imagination of the deceived worshippers, is evident from the following passages where the authors of these passages actually call upon these gods to worship Yahweh.
Psalm 97:7 reads:
「Worship him [Yahweh] all you gods.」
In Psalm 138:1 the writer says that he will sing praises to Yahweh in the presence of all the gods:
「I will praise thee with my whole heart: BEFORE THE GODS will I sing praise unto thee.」
The word 「before」 comes from the Hebrew word 「neged.」 Gesenius Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon To The Old Testament, on p. 530, states that this word primarily means 「in the presence off; in the sight off.」 The understanding of the early Israelites was that Yahweh was the local and national god of Israel. He was worshipped in Israel - the land of his own inheritance. In other nations other gods ruled. There are other passages which prove that ancient Hebrew authors of the bible believed that the gods of other nations were actual deities and living beings who could be punished and upon whom judgement can be executed. In Jeremiah 46:25 Yahweh said the following:
「I am going to punish Amon, the god of Thebes together with Egypt and its gods and kings」 [Good News Bible].
「I will punish Amon, god of Thebes, and all the other gods of Egypt. I will punish Pharaoh too, and all who trust in him」 [The Living Bible – Life Application Bible].
「I will inflict punishment on Amon of No and on Pharaoh – on Egypt, her gods, and her kings – on Pharaoh and all who rely on him」 [Jewish Tanakh].
In a footnote we are told that Amon was a tutelary deity of the City No [Thebes]. Amon of No [Thebes] is also mentioned in Nahum 3:8. It would be impossible to punish and inflict punishment and pain on Amon if he was a nonexistent being and merely an idol of stone and an imagination of a corrupt human mind. In Psalm 29:1 David calls on the 「bene elohim」 – 「sons of God」 to give praise to Yahweh. Some translators were dishonest and falsely translated the verse but some were honest and correctly rendered the phrase 「sons of God」 or 「sons of gods」 or 「divine beings.」 The Jewish Tanak actually translates the phrase as 「divine beings.」 The ancient Israelites regarded Yahweh their god as the greatest of the sons of Elyon and that is why they expected other gods to bow before Yahweh and worship him. In Psalm 89:6 we read:
「For who in the skies can equal the LORD [Yahweh], can compare with the LORD [Yahweh], among the DIVINE BEINGS?」 [Jewish Tanakh].
「For who in the skies can rank with the LORD [Yahweh]? Who is like the LORD [Yahweh] among the SONS OF GOD?」 [New American Catholic Bible].
「For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the SONS OF GOD.」 [New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures].
「For who in the heavens shall be compared unto the Lord [Yahweh]? And who shall be likened to the Lord [Yahweh] among THE SONS OF GOD?」 [Greek Septuagint Bible].
The psalmist asks who among the sons of God can be compared to their god Yahweh. The question clearly shows that Yahweh was one of these sons. The psalmist was not comparing the sons with El Elyon – for no such comparison is possible – since no son of El could ever be His equal. But among the sons of El no one could match Yahweh the god of Israel. He was a warrior god and the Israelites praised him as a warfare hero. That the early Israelites believed that Yahweh could have a brother is evident from the name AHIJAH which means BROTHER OF YAHWEH just like the name AHIMELECH means BROTHER OF MELECH. Ahijah was a son of Ahitub who served as priest under King Saul.
It can be demonstrated that angelic beings are named after El Elyon and not Yahweh. The super angels – generally called archangels – bear the name El and not Yahweh. Michael is MishaEL, Gabriel is GabriEL, Raphael is RaphaEL, Uriel is UriEL etc. Why dont these angels bear the name Yahweh? Why was Jacobs name changed to IsraEL and not to IsraYAH? Pre Mosaic names are theophoric names and bear the name El. In Genesis 5 we find the following names:
MEHUJAEL
METHUSHAEL
MAHALEL.
Other names of pre Mosaic times:
ISHMAEL
UZZIEL [Moses uncle]
ELZAPHAN [Moses cousin]
No one was named after Yahweh which shows that Yahweh was a later deity who in ancient Israel displaced the Most High God El Elyon just as in Greek mythology Zeus displaced his father Cronos. But you may point to a passage of Genesis 14 and claim that Abraham identified Yahweh as El Elyon and the creator of heaven and earth. Melchisedek was the priest of the Most High God, that is, of El Elyon in Hebrew. Melchisedek greeted Abraham with the following words:
「Blessed be Abram of God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth」 [verse 19].
But Abraham replied:
「I lift up my hand to Yahweh, God Most High」 [verse 22].
It is thus claimed that Abraham equated Yahweh with El Elyon. But the fact is: the earlier versions of this passage did not have the name Yahweh. It was added later by the masorites. The early Greek Septuagint, the Symmachus translation and the Old Latin have Abraham say the same thing Melchisedek said. Why was there a need to corrupt the text and insert the name Yahweh? In Genesis 22:14 we are told that Abraham named a site where he was to offer Isaac as a sacrifice, JEHOVAH JIREH [KJV] or YAHWEH YIREH in the Hebrew bible. But this was just another corruption and a forgery by the masorites. The oldest version of the bible known as the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible, translated by Martin Abegg, Jr. Peter Flint and Eugene Ulrich has Abraham naming the place ELOHIM YIREH. Please note the comment by these translators at the passage of Genesis 22:14:
「Since, according to the bible itself, the name Yahweh – translated 「LORD」 in most modern editions of the Bible – was later revealed to Moses in the book of Exodus [3:13-15], students of the Pentateuch have long debated the use of Yahweh in the book of Genesis. A common solution suggests that an early author/editor indiscriminately used the term in his copying of the text. 4QGen-Exod – sure to fuel the debate afresh – 「replaces」 the term Yahweh in Genesis 22:14 with the more common Hebrew term for God. Thus the familiar Jehovah Jireh becomes Elohim Jireh.」
I may also add that only one source of the Pentateuch, the J source, uses the name Yahweh but other sources use the name El. Even the Jewish Encyclopaedia admits this fact when it comments on the name Yahweh art. Names of God:
"This name, according to the narrative in Ex. iii. (E), was made known to Moses in a vision at Horeb. In another, parallel narrative (Ex. vi. 2, 3, P) it is stated that the name was not known to the Patriarchs. It is used by one of the ocumentary sources of Genesis (J), but scarcely if at all by the others."
Originally Yahweh and Baal were one and the same god in ancient Israel. Only later did the Israelites identify Yahweh as the universal and supreme God. It was a common practice among the pagans to name their children after gods and goddesses that they worshipped. Daniels name was changed to Belteshazzar - after the name of Bel that is, Baal [Daniel 4:8]. One can understand that the apostate Jews and the Israelites named their children after Baal. But there is a problem when David who was supposedly a zealous worshipper of Yahweh and who served no other god, names his children after Baal. It is also a problem when King Saul who was also a stern worshipper of Yahweh names his children after Baal. Let us first take a look at King Saul. His fathers brother was named Baal [1 Chronicles 8:30]. One of King Sauls sons was named ISHBAAL [man of Baal]. 1 Chronicles 8:33 and 9:39 preserve this name in its original form. But this name was later changed by the Jewish redactors to ISHBOSHETH. They have replaced the name Baal with the Hebrew word 「bosheth」 which means 「shame.」 This change is evident from 2 Samuel 2:8; 3:7; and 4:5 where the name is given as ISHBOSHETH instead of ISHBAAL. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, art. Ishbosheth, on p. 904, says:
「The original form of the name seems to have been Ishbaal, but because of the reluctance of the post-seventh-century B.C. Hebrews to use the name Baal, the form Ishbosheth was substituted.」
One of the grandsons of King of Saul, the actual son of Jonathan, was originally called MERIB BAAL [1 Chronicles 8:34; 9:40]. This name was later changed to MEPHIBOSHETH - as is evident from 2 Samuel 4:4 and 9:6. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 3, art. Mephibosheth, on p. 320, says:
「In the Chroniclers genealogy [2Chr. 8:34; 9:40] he is called Merib baal; no doubt the name 『boshet,』 「shame,」 was a later substitution for the false god.」
The Jewish Encyclopedia:
「One of King Davids sons was originally called BEELIADA a variant spelling of BAALIADA」 [1 Chronicles 14:7].
For one reason or another, David compounded the name of his son with the name of the god Baal. The later Jewish redactors and editors found this name offensive and idolatrous so they changed it to ELIADA [2 Samuel 5:16 and 1 Chronicles 3:8]. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 1, art. Beeliada, on p. 447, says:
「The name of a son of David born in Jerusalem, but CHANGED to Eliada in ORDER TO REMOVE THE ELEMENT OF BAAL FROM THE NAME.」
The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia Of The Bible, Vol. 1, art. Beeliada, on p. 505, says:
「A son of David, born at Jerusalem. The name was CHANGED to Eliada when the name Baal became distasteful because of its association with idolatry.」
The Jewish Encyclopedia, under name Beeliada, says:
"A son of David (I Chron. xiv. 7), who in II Sam. v. 16 and I Chron. iii. 8 is called "Eliada." This is due to an intentional change by the scribe, to whom the name "Baal" was hateful, and who therefore substituted "El" in its place. For other instances of disguising the name "Baal," see Bosheth.
Under 『bosheth it says:
"Used concretely by the Prophets as "the shameful thing" to designate the Baalim and their images. (See Hosea ix. 10 and Jer. iii. 24, xi. 13, where the word is parallel with "the Baal" [compare Jer. iii. 24]). Later usage adopted the epithet to such an extent that "Bosheth" became a sort of euphemism for "Baal," as is learned from the proper names "Ish-bosheth" (with which Jastrow [see Bibliography] compares a Babylonian name, "Mati-bashti") and "Mephibosheth," the former being written "Esh-baal" in I Chron. viii. 33, ix. 39, and the latter occurring as "Meri-baal" in I Chron. viii. 34 and ix. 40. The manuscript of the Septuagint, known as 93 Holmes, has εἰσβααλ, and the old Latin version has "Isbalem" for "Ish-bosheth." So also in II Sam. xi. 21, "Jerubbe[o]sheth" is given for"Jerubbaal."
The Jewish Encyclopedia under Names of God, sub title, Adonai and Baal says:
"The name Baal ( ), apparently as an equivalent for Yhwh, occurs as an element in a number of compound proper names, such as Jerubbaal, Ishbaal, Meribaal, etc. Some of these names, probably at a time when the name of Baal had fallen into disrepute (comp. Hosea ii. 16, 17), seem to have been changed by the substitution of El or Bosheth for Baal (comp. II Sam. ii. 8, iv. 4, v. 16; I Chron. viii. 33, 34; ix. 39, 40; xiv. 7)."
The later Jewish redactors tampered with their bible and removed the name of Baal from these names. But this does not change the fact that originally King Saul and King David named their children after the god Baal who for them was the same as Yahweh. When David fought a battle and defeated his foes he named that place with the name of BAAL although he credited Yahweh with this victory. Please note the text of 2 Samuel 5:20 as is translated in The Interlinear Bible, by J.P. Green:
「And David came to Baal perazim. And David struck them there, and said, JEHOVAH has broken forth on my enemies before me, as the breaking forth of waters. On account of this he called the name of that place THE BREAKING OF BAAL.」
Here Baal is a synonym for Yahweh. Sometimes the names Baal and Yahweh were so closely associated together that it is impossible to distinguish them. The god worshipped after the death of Gideon was named Baal Berith - Lord of the Covenant [Judges 8:33]. The same god is called El Berith - God of the Covenant [Judges 9:46]. One of Davids warriors, a Benjamite, was named BEALIAH - in the King James Bible [1 Chronicles 12:5]. His real Hebrew name was actually BAAL YAH - which means YAHWEH IS BAAL. In the Greek Septuagint his name is given as BAALIAH. The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia Of The Bible, Vol. 1, art. Bealiah, on p. 494, says that the name actually means YAHWEH IS LORD. But when you reverse the title Lord back to Hebrew the result is BAAL. The Jewish Encyclopedia under Baal and Baal Worship states:
"It has been already indicated that the Baal plays a great rôle in Canaanitic proper names. A curious phase in the history of the cult in Israel is shown in the substitution by later editors of ( ), "boshet," "the shameful thing," for Baal in such names as Ishbosheth and Mephibosheth; compare "Eshbaal," I Chron. viii. 33, and "Meribbaal," I Chron. ix. 40 (viii. 34). A name which could not be thus treated was "Bealiah" (I Chron. xii. 6 [A. V. 5]), which means "Jehovah is Baal."
When King Saul and his son Jonathan and King David compounded the names of their sons with the god Baal, they only did what many other Israelites have done. For them Baal and Yahweh were one and the same god as many names prove. The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia Of The Bible, Vol. 1, art. Baal, on p. 433, says:
「The Samaria obstraca, dating from c. 780 B.C., shows that this tendency [naming children after Baal] was particularly prominent in the northern kingdom; for every two names in lists compounded with the name Yahweh, one was formed with Baal.」
The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Religion, Vol. F-N, on p. 1343, says:
「The Samaria ostraca yield almost as many names composed with BAAL as with Yahweh.」
Even a certain Reubenite prince was named after Baal. His name was actually Baal [1 Chronicles 5:5]. After settling across the Jordan, the Reubenites built a city and called it Baal Meon [Numbers 32:38]. Later the name Baal was dropped and it was called Beth Meon [Jeremiah 48:23]. In Numbers 32:3 it is referred to as Beon. There was also an important town in Judah called Baale Judah which means lords of Judah. The Ark of the Covenant was there before David brought it to Jerusalem [2 Samuel 6:2]. The original name of the city was Kiriath Jearim.
Now we can take a closer look at Psalm 82.
「The gods stand in the assembly of El, who judges in the midst of the gods.」
The gods were the 72 sons of Elyon [Most High] who ruled over the nations. These gods were accused by the Most High of misrule and injustice:
「How long will you defend the unjust and show partiality to the wicked? Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless; maintain the rights of the poor and oppressed. Rescue the weak and needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked…I said YOU ARE GODS; you are ALL SONS OF THE MOST HIGH. But you will DIE like mere men」 [verses 2-7].
This psalm depicts the heavenly council in session. All the gods - rulers of the 72 nations [based on Greek Septuagint] - are assembled before the Most High. He accuses them of misconduct and tells them that even though they are ALL HIS SONS and therefore DIVINE, they will die just like mere men. Many bible commentators are aware of this. They are aware that these gods - the sons of El - were members of the Divine Council which was presided by the Most High. Nelsons New Bible Dictionary, art. Sons of God, on p. 1194, says:
「The sons of God presented themselves before God in what might be called a HEAVENLY ASSEMBLY.」
The Zondervan NIV Commentary, Vol. 1, on p. 746, says:
「The DIVINE COUNCIL is made up of the SONS OF GOD.」
Hastings Dictionary Of The Bible, on p. 135, says:
「In a few passages in the Old Testament the term 『sons of God is applied to DIVINE BEINGS, demigods or angels, members of the HEAVENLY COUNCIL…Thus in these cases the 『children of God usually called 『sons of God,』 were the family of divine beings of whom GOD WAS APPARENTLY THE PHYSICAL FATHER.」
The Oxford Companion To The Bible, on p. 713, says:
「The sons of God are divine members of Gods heavenly assembly.」
The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, art. Sons of God, on p. 584, says:
「SONS OF GOD - divine beings. Just as 『sons of man means human beings in Hebrew, so 『sons of God means divine beings, i.e. gods.」
New Bible Dictionary, J.D. Douglas, art. Sons of God, on p. 1133, says:
「In the Old Testament [a] individual of the class 『god.』 『Son [Heb. Ben, Aram. Bar] is commonly used in Semitic languages to denote membership of a class, as 「son of Israel for 「Israelite,』 『son of might for 『valorous.』 『Son of God in Heb. means 『god or 『god-like.」
Did you get that? Just as 『son of man in Hebrew means 『a human being so the term 『son of God means 『god.』 Just as dogs beget dogs, and men beget men, so does God beget gods.
The early Hebrews [as did also the Canaanites] believed that there were gods other than Yahweh and that in fact there was a God who was greater and superior to Yahweh. They have called Him by his name ELYON which means: MOST HIGH or SUPREME. Even though the true God, the Most High did not have a name – since there was no one to name Him, since He is before all – the early peoples attributed the title Elyon as a name to the supreme God. The title Elyon whenever used of the Super Being it is never preceded with a 「definite article.」 According to the grammar of the Hebrew language names are never preceded with a definite article while the titles are. This is what The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 7, on p. 680 has to say concerning 『Elyon:』
「The Hebrew word 『elyon is an adjective meaning 「higher, upper,」 e.g., the 「upper」 pool [Isa. 7:3], the 「upper」 gate [2 Kings 15:35], and 「highest」 e.g. the 「highest」 of all the kings of the earth [Ps. 89:28]. When used in reference to God, the word can rightly be translated as 「Most High.」 Since in reference to God 『elyon IS NEVER PRECEDED BY THE ARTICLE 『HA [「THE」], IT MUST HAVE BEEN REGARDED AS A PROPER NOUN, A NAME OF GOD.」
The very fact that the true and eternal God – the God who was before all and anything – is called God Most High – proves that there were and must be other gods who are subordinate to Him. If there were no gods at all then El would simply be called God and not the Most High God. Yahweh was not and could not have been the Most High God and the creator of the universe because Israel was his INHERITANCE from the Most High God. El Elyon appointed Yahweh to rule over Israel and the sons of Jacob became Yahwehs lot. There are numerous texts which clearly state that Israelites were Yahwehs own inheritance.
Sometime after the Babylonian Captivity the Jewish hierarchy imposed a ban on using and pronouncing the name Yahweh on the pretext that it was too holy.. The Catholic Encyclopedia, art. Yahweh states:
「Sometime after the end of the Exile, the name Yahweh began to be considered with special reverence, and the practice arose of substituting for it the word ADONAI or ELOHIM」.
The Hebrew language is written without vowels. However, the original Paleo Hebrew had vowels. In order to ban the pronunciation of the name Yahweh the shoferim introduced the vowel points of ADONAY or ELOHIM above the four consonants - Y H W H. This indicated to a Jewish reader not to pronounce the name YAHWEH but rather to read ADONAY or ELOHIM instead. The adherents of Christendom did not understand that and so in 1518 c.e. Pope Leo Xs confessor, Peter Gallatin misread this as IAHOVAH that was later vocalized as JEHOVAH. Dr. Rotherham calls this name 『monstrosity. He compared this practice to adopting the vowels of Portugal - O U A - and inserting them between the consonants of GERMANY - G R M N Y - creating a hybrid GORMUNA. [See the preface of the Emphasized Bible]. The Century Bible, Vol. 1. on p. 91 gives us the following information:
「Hebrew was originally written without vowels, but when the 『vowel points were added, the vowels of 『Adonay or 『Elohim were written with YAHWEH...at the Reformation, the former being more usual, was sometimes used as the Name of the God of Israel, and owing to ignorance of its history was misread as 『Jehovah, a form which has established itself in English, but does not give the pronunciation of the Holy Name it represents」.
When Peter Gallatin introduced the name JEHOVAH other prominent scholars like Le Mercier, J. Drusius, and L. Cappelus contested his views by arguing that JEHOVAH was 「against grammatical and historical propriety」. Their protests however fell on the dead ears of the Catholic hierarchy. It is important to underline here that the pronunciation JEHOVAH is not only incorrect and a hybrid but it is indeed MONSTROUS as Dr. Rotherham pointed out. The word hovah is another form of the word havvah and means ruin, mischief, perversion, very wickedness. You can verify this fact by consulting Strongs Hebrew Dictionary under word numbers #1942 and #1943. Now the name YAHWEH is derived from the Hebrew word hayah which means to be. In the third person this word becomes YAHWEH and means he causes to be. The name Jehovah therefore means he causes to be ruin, mischief, perversion, very wickedness...
I have pointed out that the Jewish hierarchy imposed a ban on pronouncing the name YAHWEH. Initially this ban was not absolute. That is, the pronouncing of the so called sacred name was permitted in the temple. Later, the ban was extended to cover the temple and only the High Priest was allowed to pronounce the Name once a year - on the Day of Atonement. Initially the High Priest pronounced the Name in such a way that the participants in the service could hear. Later the practice was introduced to pronounce the Name in a very soft tone so that no one present could actually hear its pronunciation. The Jewish Talmud verifies the fact that initially the ban was not absolute. The Mishnah actually states the following:
「In the sanctuary one says the Name as it is written but in the provinces, with a euphemism」 [m. Sotah 7:6; b. Sotah 38b; m. Tamid 7:2].
Dr. A. Cohen, a rabbi and author states:
「...in the early Rabbinic period the pronunciation of the Name was restricted to the Temple service」 [Everymans Talmud].
Mishnah also points out that in the temple the folks used the name Yahweh in their greetings:
「And they ordained that an individual should greet his fellow with [Gods] name, in accordance with what is said, 「And behold Boaz came from Bethlehem; and he said to the reapers, 『YHWH be with you!』 And they answered, 『YHWH bless you [Ruth 2:4; m. Ber. 9:5].
By the time of Jesus and his disciples the absolute ban on the use of the name Yahweh was in place. At the time of Jesus it was a capital offense to pronounce or cause others to pronounce the name Yahweh. Those guilty of such offense were tried before BEIT DIN and if convicted they were executed.
In the Talmud we read the following statement:
「Among those excluded from the world to come is he who pronounces the Name according to its letters」 [Sanhedrin 10:1].
Pesikta 148a states:
「Whoever explicitly pronounces the Name is guilty of a capital offense」.
Even the non-conformist community of Qumran banned the pronunciation of the name Yahweh. In the Manual of Discipline also called the Community Rule we find various instructions as how to deal with those members who sin. Different sins were dealt with in a different manner. For example, whoever deliberately lied was to do penance for six months. Whoever has deliberately deceived his fellow member shall do penance for six months. However, whoever spoke the name Yahweh - even if it was accidental - that person was to be ex-communicated and never be allowed to return to the Community. Please note the following text quoted from the Manual of Discipline:
「If any man has uttered the [Most] Venerable Name even though frivolously, or as a result of a shock or for any other reason whatever, while reading the Book or praying, he shall be dismissed and shall return to the Council of Community no more」 [1QS Col. 6 line 27b - Col. 7 line 2a].
The ban on the name Yahweh is also apparent in the canonical bible. We have two psalms in the bible which are commonly referred to as twins because of their virtual identical content. They are Psalms 14 and 53. It is of extreme significance to realise that in Psalm 14 the name YAHWEH appears. In Psalm 53 the name YAHWEH is dropped and is substituted with ELOHIM. Psalm 14 was written during the actual Babylonian captivity. The author was hoping for salvation from ZION. He was hoping YAHWEH would bring the captives back HOME. Originally the Book of Psalms circulated as 5 separate books. Book 1 was composed of psalms 1-41, book 2 of psalms 42-72, book 3 of psalms 73-89, book 4 of psalms 90-106 and book 5 of psalms 106-150. Each book ended with words Amen and Amen. Psalm 14 was not written by David as the title of the psalm implies. It was written by someone who was actually in exile at Babylon. This is evident from the fact that the author longed for salvation from Zion and the return of the Jews to their HOME. The author originally used the name YAHWEH. Psalm 53 belonged to book 2 and was edited by a shofer sometime after the Babylonian captivity. Since at this time it was customary not to pronounce the name YAHWEH the shofer took liberty to actually replace the name YAHWEH with ELOHIM [commonly rendered God in English bibles]. This is not surprising since the Masorites also removed the name Yahweh and substituted it with Adonay in 134 instances. The official list given in the Massorah, 107:5 Gingsburg edition clearly verifies this fact. Therefore psalms 14 and 53 bear testimony that ban on the name Yahweh dates back to at least five hundred years before the birth of Jesus.
The name Yahweh was banned after the return from the Babylonian captivity not because it was too sacred to pronounce it. The idea is too absurd since it was very clear from the bible that the name was commonly pronounced prior to captivity. The name was banned because it was realised just who Yahweh was and that the pre Babylonian religion was false - hence it was reformed and gradually turned into pharisaic Judaism.
It is of colossal importance to realise that the authors of the New Testament never use the name Yahweh even when they quote the Old Testament passages where the name appears. Jesus never uses the name and he never criticises the Pharisees and the priests for not using the name. In fact, when Jesus quotes the Old Testament passage from Deuteronomy 8:3 he drops the name Yahweh and instead pronounces the name El. Please note the text as it stands in the Hebrew bible:
"...man shall not live by bread alone; but man lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of YAHWEH."
And now please note Matthew 4:4:
"...man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of GOD."
The Greek word theos appears and when reverted back to Hebrew the word is el and not Yahweh. Therefore it is evident that either Jesus dropped the name Yahweh or the author of Matthew did. The only place where the name Yahweh in its abbreviated form supposedly exists in the New Testament is Revelation 19:3. Please note the verse:
"And again they shouted: Alleluia! The smoke from her goes up for ever and ever."
The word hallelujah in the Old Testament Hebrew means praise Yah. But John wrote the word eleleu ih and the later scribes ignorantly corrupted it into alleluia and the modern translators corrupted it into hallelujah. The Greek word simply meant mighty God lives as is evident from the fact that the hymns sung to Apollo began and ended with this word. The worshippers of Apollo would not have addressed their god as Yah nor would they have cried praise yah - since the god they worshipped was Apollo and not Yahweh.
=================
天主教醜聞所以震撼全球是因為傳媒的報導﹐但是真正數據反映出﹐其實基督教的淫亂無道不下於天主教
侵犯少年﹑強姦少女﹑狎玩孩童﹐隱瞞或者淡化事情﹐教牧和教眾(除受害人外)把侵犯者轉到另外一個教會﹐甚至到另外一個宗派牧會……
聽來熟口熟面罷﹖
基督教校牧會眾合謀隱瞞教牧性侵犯罪行﹗﹗﹗
基督教教牧性侵犯的數目字驚人﹗
Terry Mattingly
教牧性侵犯事件已經達到令人震驚的地步﹗
2000 report to the Baptist General Convention of Texas
同一報告指出早在一九八零年﹐研究已經估計﹐約有﹕
百分之十二的教牧和會友發生性關係
百分之四十的教牧和會友﹐有發生「性方面的不當行為」
這些教牧性罪行﹐在美國基督教圈子稱為 Clergy Sexual Abuse﹐或CSA。
CSA受害者組成互助隊伍﹐除了互相醫治﹐也為他們提供法律服務﹐去把一些不悔改的教牧繩之於法﹐和向故意包庇的教會追討賠償。
令人震驚的是﹐基督教處理美國教牧涉及性侵犯﹐往往把涉及暴力的性侵犯罪行稱為「只是一段情」(an affair)﹐或者指那是「你情我願」。
一位已為人母的女牧者﹐年輕時候被一個牧師強暴﹐這個牧師同時也強暴過她女兒和其他少女。這個牧師從來沒有受法律制裁﹐相反不同教會一次又一次容野L轉去另外的地方牧養同宗派的會堂﹐一次又一次發生強暴﹐這個牧師都得到復職﹐而完全逍遙法外。
如果天主教醜聞是因為他們神父/聖職統制有機會給神職人員包庇犯性罪行的神父﹐基督教裡面更可怕。因為是教牧﹑執事甚至是會眾﹐都參與包庇﹑把犯罪教牧悄悄地送去不知就裡的會堂。犯罪的是整個教會。
最大的危機是﹐基督教比天主教更糟糕﹕天主教還可以通過他們一個整合的體制互通神職人員有問題的資料﹐但是基督教沒有﹕沒有一個中央檔案資料可以知道那個牧者涉及嚴重罪行﹐等教會可以防備。
當宗派裡面崇尚地方教會自治﹐或者會堂主義﹐情況會更加複雜﹕
犯事教牧的教會執事對調查自己教牧諸多顧忌﹐不敢張揚。其他教會﹐卻怕干預別的教會自治﹐不可以插手。眾多基督教會﹐崇尚獨立﹐但出事時候﹐卻沒有任何一個訟裁者去處理﹐除非告去法庭。但是傳統美國基督教對教外人的信任不高﹐認為是「世俗」﹐他們連考慮尋求輔導都不會﹐更加不可能會把事件交給警方和法庭。
犯事教牧的教會執事和會友更加怕會友流失﹐影響教會聲譽﹐教會可能一夜倒閉﹐而寧願息事寧人。基本問題﹐大部份地方教會是沒有任何指引和政策去處理教牧涉及性侵犯與性罪行的情況﹐也沒有要求教牧簽署一些操守指引。
最出奇是教會的反應是﹕我們如何避免虛假指控﹑法庭訴訟和醫治牧者﹖反而很少人問﹐我們當如何醫治整個受害的肢體﹖
1991年﹐科羅拉多州的聖公會教區被法庭判要賠償一百二十萬美元給一位教牧性侵犯受害者。那受害者控告教區隱瞞那個教牧的性侵犯行為導致她受害。
這個案例特點﹐是不論任何宗派或者獨立教會﹐都不可以免責﹐只要那個教牧是他們僱傭的﹐他們不可以說「請錯了人﹑看錯」﹐或者地方教會不夠錢﹐就不需要賠償。
此案例一開﹐一個性侵犯訴訟﹐可以拖垮一個小教會。
這個案例令主流宗派訂立防禦政策﹐訓練和指引。但如上文所說﹐獨立堂會往往不會這樣做。
美國一位專門研究CSA的作家Dee Miller說﹐她在教會討論這些問題﹐遇見一個她尊敬的牧者﹐對她說﹕你知道嗎﹐我對這回事肯定是老行尊。我幹了五十多次﹗(意思是他侵犯姐妹五十多次﹐每次都轉去牧養另外一間教會﹐留下一個爛攤子)
美國教牧甚至會友都認為被侵犯者「也有責任﹐因為他們或者有誘惑那個侵犯者﹐使他受到試探﹐甚至小孩子也會誘惑成年人去犯性罪行……」
天主教以外的最大基督宗派美南浸信會(Southern Baptist Convention)裡面牧涉及性侵犯與性罪行的問題已經不是什麼秘密﹐但是他們仍然採取逃避的態度。
他們的理由往往是﹕這只是一個偶然性的事件﹐我只知道他侵犯過一個人(其實他們沒有追查)。
他們把這個偶然跌倒的「僕人」介紹給另外一個教會﹐說「他已經悔改了﹐請你給他機會罷」。Dee Miller說﹐那個教會應該問﹕你會不會給你妻子跟那個偶然跌倒的僕人獨處﹖(will you trust him with your wife ?)
上面那個可以轉會五十次的教牧不是獨立事件。犯罪的教牧隨時可以得到會友「幫助」﹐到另外一個教會服事。
Jan 和她女兒﹐曾經是教會活躍和投入的會友﹐但是她倆今天同樣掙紮著面對共同的創傷 -- 真的共同 -- 她倆都被同一個牧師性侵犯過。
他們把這個偶然跌倒的「僕人」介紹給另外一個教會﹐說「他已經悔改了﹐請你給他機會罷」。Dee Miller說﹐那個教會應該問﹕你會不會給你妻子跟那個偶然跌倒的僕人獨處﹖(will you trust him with your wife ?)
上面那個可以轉會五十次的教牧不是獨立事件。犯罪的教牧隨時可以得到會友「幫助」﹐到另外一個教會服事。
William Michael Altman﹐一間獨立堂會 Grace Christian Ministries的長老﹐去醫院探望一個婦人﹐她是兒童性侵犯受害者﹐曾多次企圖自殺。
Altman 為她進行輔導﹐說會幫助她。但是不久﹐Altman露出獸性﹐他要那個婦人和他口交。
那個婦人最後在法庭作證指證Altman。
另外一個牧者﹐為一個受性侵犯姐妹輔導時候﹐突然「分享」他的「人獸交合」經驗。這個姐妹是教堂司琴﹐這個牧者會在她鋼琴上留下小禮物﹕一片染有他精液的紙巾﹗
Haman Cross Jr﹐Park Baptist Church 牧師﹐輔導一個會友﹐在輔導裡面﹐Cross向姐妹展示色情照片和錄像﹐又說可以和她在電話玩「phone sex「﹐說可以幫助她婚後性生活。
Haman Cross 本身也是Campus Crusade的講員﹐後來 Campus Crusade把他停職﹐因為發現他最少涉及三宗對教友的性侵犯。
Dee Miller她自己既是護士﹐也是美南浸信會宣教士﹐在非洲宣教時候﹐被自己的同工侵犯。美南浸信會的海外宣教部和本會都企圖隱瞞﹐阻撓她追究。
Dee Miller現在全職幫助CSA受害人治療﹐並且揭露美國教會﹐特別是保守的教派裡面的性侵犯問題。
教會對教外的罪行都不留情面的指責﹐當他們講壇的牧者犯上這些可怕的罪﹐教會就癱瘓了。他們甚至持雙重標準﹐對於教外人他們毫不避諱會用"sexual abuse"這個詞﹐但是同一類罪行﹐他們的態度是淡化它﹐扮無知﹐否定之﹐甚至指責受害者其實是誘惑牧者﹐也指責出來指證的受害人「不懂得基督的愛﹑應該寬恕」﹑「爭訟羞辱主名(當受害人告牧者)」等。(奇怪嗎﹐我們為何不用同一標準對待天主教的性醜聞呢)
別以為天主教會包庇是惡行﹐最少因為天主教的制度容訴訟。
美國天主教之外最大的基督宗教組織﹐也是美國新教(Protestants)最大宗派﹐會友一千五百萬的美南浸信會SBC的制度﹐可以讓這些教牧逍遙法外。
除了 Dee Miller在海外宣教發生的性侵犯事件﹐另外的﹐就是 Wade 事件。美南浸信會主席 Richard Land﹐指因為他們奉行地方教會獨立自治﹐因此無權干預地方教會行政﹐所以地方教會的牧師性侵犯入罪﹐受害者不可以控告SBC -- 但是不可不知﹐SBC是知道這些事情﹐而部份更加有暗中幫助犯事牧者轉到另外的浸信會事奉。SBC其實權力很大﹐曾經令不同教會和神學院依從他們的保守信仰路線﹐解僱不跟隨的教牧﹐但是對於教牧性侵犯﹐卻聲稱「無能為力」。
Land所知道的例子﹐更加是在SBC權力範圍﹕那是發生在SBC差傳部(Foreign Mission Board, FMB)的。Diana Wade的女兒﹐被她自己的丈夫﹐也是女兒的生父侵犯。Diana Wade 認為FMB應該為此事件負責﹐因為FMB知道發生事件後﹐既不知會她﹐也沒有要求她丈夫接受輔導。那個獸性父親還侵犯他自己其他而女。最後那父親入獄12年。
發生在地方教會的性侵犯難以見報﹐一個原因是地方教會財力小﹐賠償金很小﹐或者往往庭外和解﹐因此基督教裡面很多發生的性侵犯訴訟被傳媒忽略﹐除非是大的基督教機構/教會﹐傳媒才有興趣。
Collusion﹐同謀﹐就是 Dee Miller形容教會如何縱容犯事的教牧。
用同謀形容﹐因為不同天主教只限於屬神職人員架構裡面﹐基督教會發生性侵犯行為﹐會是教會領袖和會眾「同心合意(受害者除外)」的去隱瞞﹐阻止事件洩露﹐並且把牧師悄悄送去另外一個教會繼續事奉。
被動的同謀者
1) 知道有可能發生這些事情﹐故意當不知道﹐不理會
2) 當有人主動告訴他/她教牧可能對姊妹進行性侵犯﹐會不理會﹐像好撒馬利亞人的祭司/利未人﹐「從另外一面過去」﹐不去調查
3) 教牧或者領袖拒絕採取預防﹐例如在涉及兒童的活動有適當監視﹐例如不容酗@個成年人和小數目/個別孩子或者少年相﹐處﹐必須多個一個人﹐或者在輔導房設立窗戶﹐甚至錄影
4) 當發生投訴﹐拖延處理
主動的同謀
1) 知道發生事情﹐去把受害者抹黑﹐說「她是自找的﹐她故意誘惑牧師」
2) 當教會因為拒絕受理受害人申訴而被受害人狀告﹐有些人反而用金錢支持教會打官司﹐認為教會拒絕受理受害人申訴是對的
3) 把受害人孤立﹐進行性侵犯的牧師反而可以繼續講道﹐受害人被孤立﹐因為她「拒絕寬恕」
4) 教會或者宗派說﹐沒有金錢幫助受害人 -- 不過他們有很多資金幫助海外宣教事工﹑幫助窮人或者受苦者。在他們說﹐性侵犯受害者還不算「受苦者」
如果玩同謀遊戲﹖
1) 顛倒是非﹕侵犯者(教牧)才是受害人﹐被侵犯者才是有罪(她把試探放在神的僕人面前)
2) 推卸責任﹐把人當人球拋來拋去﹐沒有人去負責調查
3) 不理會﹐如常進行教會聚會事工﹐縱然很多人已經大概知道出了亂子
4) 企圖用條件交換﹕對受害者說﹕「你悄悄離開這教會(怎麼不是侵犯者走﹖)﹐我們答應不透露你和教牧的事情(要挾﹖﹖)」﹐甚至付出金錢希望受害人沉默。
DIM - Denial, Ignorance, Minimization 是 Dee Miller 所說的所謂逃避心態﹕
Denial -否認事實﹐逃避面對
Ignorance -對事件嚴重性無知或者裝作不知道
Minimization - 淡化事件﹐「大事化小﹐小事化無」﹐希望受害人沉默﹐不向他們追究 ,說弟兄姊妹和睦同居﹐是何等的善何等的美﹖
上面例子的教會﹐有條件的﹕不要作吹哨子的人 (whistle blower)
根據基督教的保險組織顯示﹐平均基督教每星期有70宗性侵犯案件。
而且﹐把基督教神職人員和教友發生自願性行為﹑侵犯女性﹑兒童數字裡面﹐涉及牧者是基督教牧者的0.5%﹐如果裡面一半計算﹐是0.25%﹐仍然遠遠超過天主教的0.01%.
基督教從來沒有足夠數據是因為基督教分開無數宗派.
美國的基督教跨宗派組織Christian Ministry Resources﹐調查了美國1000教會﹐從1993年開始蒐集資料﹐10年來﹐平均每星期﹐基督教有70宗性侵犯。
有人認為﹐CMR的數目比實際還低﹐一個在達拉斯市一戶一戶的調查﹐調查1607戶家庭﹐4%表示家人曾經被基督教牧者性侵犯。
Christian Ministry Resources的調查發現﹐大部份涉及教牧的性侵犯是在基督教教會發生﹐而非傳播媒介所報導集中在天主教會。
基督教的 Christian Ministry Resource 指出﹐從1993年統計﹐每星期基督教有70宗性罪行﹐
=============
每星期﹐美國基督教有70宗性罪行﹐很低呵﹖
Joe 你教會每星期多少次性罪行﹖
扭曲數據 - 美國基督教數據清楚表示﹐達到10%的教牧涉及性侵犯﹐而基督教教堂/教會數目和天主教數目比例是九比一﹐基督教足有五十萬多教會﹐等於起碼五十萬牧者裡面10%﹐而那10%中四分一是孿童的(約2.5%)﹐比例遠遠高過天主教的總數的1.7%(所有性罪行類別還高)
6) Christian Ministry Resources一個服務75000教會﹐包括1000個宗派的基督教組織﹐每星期收到70宗基督教裡面發生的性侵犯指控。從1993年以來﹐十年的平均數目大約在每週70宗。Anson Shupe (Clay 引用他企圖證明天主教嚴重得多)﹐認同Christian Ministry Resources的統計﹐認為是合理的﹐甚至可能偏低。
Anson Shupe 自己在Dallas-Ft. Worth 1998年親自作過一個調查﹐受訪問的1607個家庭﹐達到4%表示家人曾經被教牧性侵犯。
1984年﹐富勒神學院 (Fuller Seminary)調查1200位教牧﹐結果五個裡面﹐有一個承認有各類性罪行(在這個調查﹐由於基督教教牧容陬盛B﹐婚外情也包括了)
一位心理輔導治療者Gary Schoener 三十年處理2000多宗個案﹐三分之二是基督教(新教)的教牧
1993年﹐一個明尼蘇達州的調查顯示﹐百分之七表示知道認識基督教有人遭遇性侵犯﹐而屬於天主教比例也低於基督教﹐是5%
著者 ~大黃貓貓