網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
對你殘忍
2009/10/28 22:52:28瀏覽20526|回應46|推薦331

必先殘忍對你, 或能仁慈在後 (哈姆雷特)

昨天在南加大評審一位博士候選人資格, 應該是同往常一般的口試流程, 卻有點出乎意料。主角是位西裔的女研究生, 她順利地完成前段的專題報告, 但後段的答詢進行到半個鐘頭時, 碰咚! 她昏倒了, 且呈現些微的休克, 我們趕緊電 911, 送往急診。

狼窟  

歡迎加入狼窟, , 這是實驗室鑰匙! 二十年前, 我的指導教授如此歡迎我參加他的研究小組。科學研究比評實力, 以論文發表品質和數量來判定真章, 成王昇遷, 敗寇出局, 現實得很。史丹福化研所要解僱研究人員, 逕換門鎖, 那一天早上鑰匙開不了門, 就知道老闆請您走路。

群狼互咬, 擂台燒香

每週小組裡成果彙報, 像是賽擂台, 各人絕招盡出。可見識到排行大狼次狼三狼等師兄姐, 可真有本事, 不只研究做得漂亮乾脆, 也練就辯才無礙, 在有些地方, 敢和老先生搶白。小狼, 幼犬, 弱雞 (rookie) 大多瞠目結舌, 每週被眾人圍剿, 修理得體無完膚。狼窟裡的經年累月的互咬練習, 鍛鍊獨立作戰的實力, 達到起碼存活的標準。每年的新進研究人員, 總有幾位跨不過雞犬的階段, 也有白耗五年的小狼, 當然有絕頂聰明又努力的傢伙, 一年內躍居第二把交椅, 半年內遞補大狼。實驗室的大小規矩、資源分配, 大狼們說了算, 有肥差外快, 他們先饌。向他們請益實驗, 多靠平日燒香的交情。

週六早晨七點半, 實驗室大集合

我延習以前的老教授的做法, 全組始終週休一日, 週六一早大點兵, 風雪無阻。遲到的傢伙, 會得到我一個老臭的撲克臉, 缺席的, 會被我在週一逮著, 做一對一的上經。我篤信一分耕耘半分收穫, 是做這行的一零一法則。 況且週六大家不上課、不須帶實驗課, 其他組多休工, 我們可完全使用公有的重型儀器設備。我也有完整時段, 和每一個人好生討論點撥。知道多年來每個人在這點怨我在心, 但這是我固執的小惡。

魔鬼黑板夜會

欠缺自發動力的小孩, 或遇到瓶頸的博士後, 最怕收到我的邀請來做一對一的會議。時間一定是某個晚上的十一點開始, 地點一定是實驗室裡的特大黑板前。他或她的文獻閱讀底子的深淺實虛, 對工作的綱領的理解掌握程度, 命題定義和求證過程的嚴謹層次, 用了多少的心力等等, 只消半小時的討論, 人焉瘦哉。諄諄善誘需要時間, 常常黑板前一站, 數回寫滿擦去, 天色巳泛白。數不清有多少篇論文的結構, 重大策略的調整, 亦步亦驅的親炙, 都在這脆弱時段 (the weak hours) 勉強完成的。魔鬼黑板夜會是小子們的戲稱, 意指我是魔鬼! 錯了, 我或誘導, 或質問, 或引喻, 或催逼, 期使小鬼破除障礙, 找到著力點。 我認為這是修成天使前的必要經歷, 即便非常難為情, 且弄得身心俱疲。 

狼窟之後 ?  虎山, 獅原, 熊野。

狼群的洗禮只是入門初階, 接下來, 如果加入學術界的行列, 大小學閥當道, 老傢伙橫行, 遊戲規則操在他們手裡, 施行美其名的鐵的紀律, 調配重點資源, 中青代只能動心忍性, 盡速蓄積功績和政治實力, 邊戰邊走。如果加入工業界的染缸, 天天嗜血刀口, 門後的政治傾軋, 內部整合外頭併購, 每人腰上總繫著幾顆敵人的項上首級, 猶然張目滴血 … 。知道前方的十面埋伏, 小子能不練成好功夫, 任何時候勤益加練?

請下重手

那位昏倒的研究生, 緊張過度有之, 四個老傢伙簡單出招詰問, 她的道行立判。答詢的結構鬆脫, 邏輯有誤, 詞彙不精確, 話多矛盾多。面臨巨觀的願景問題, 她只交代一半; 核心的機制推論, 她答的讓我感到暴殄天物; 還沒被問及實驗設計, 她巳汗如雨下、碰咚倒地了。吾黨徒子徒孫狂簡, 但也不至如此不濟!

她的老闆是位資深的猶太教授, 向採粗放的做法。我這精耕學派的土法鍊鋼, 摧枯拉朽去蕪存菁, 不到半個甲子, 倒也出了不少高手, 虎婆獅爺熊精, 各領風騷。那一天, 我們也來逐鹿圍獵諾貝爾, 豈不痛快!

您將對我殘忍? 

請下重手, 全力進招, 我謹受教!

 

 

( 心情隨筆工作職場 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=SirNorton&aid=3446338
 引用者清單(1)  
2009/11/04 01:26 【逍遙法外】 我對你不殘忍

 回應文章 頁/共 5 頁  回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁

ez
等級:8
留言加入好友
殘忍vs仁慈
2009/11/05 05:36

對你殘忍

就是

對你仁慈



一畝桑田
等級:8
留言加入好友
殘忍的慈悲
2009/11/04 08:55

學術殿堂,講究實力,嚴師當然出高徒。

荒野叢林,毒蛇猛獸,相互廝殺,倖存者稱王。

只怕居心不良,藉端藉勢,魚肉手無寸鐵的同儕後進,則不足道矣!



Valley
等級:7
留言加入好友
just curious
2009/11/02 00:21

Setting up a high standard for excellent research is absolutely required, especially in your case, you are the employer and RA students are your employees. But what I am trying to say is that a lot of Asian students went for PhD program due to their parents' expectations or whatever reasons that had nothing to do with their best interests.  They continued to heavily rely on the professors to gear them up while pursuing their degrees. After they graduated and left the place, the pressure was suddenly gone. They became very relaxed. I have personally known a PhD who got his degree from the US. Several days after he passed the Thesis Defense and got a teaching position from a local university, he phoned me. The first word he said was: " I am ready to retire"….

 

BTW, out of curiosity, is there a reason that the one-to-one meeting with the students has to take place at 11:00 pm? when the student has to fight against his body clock?

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-02 14:17 回覆:

Regardless of ethnical groups, excellent scientists are superior in curiosity, perseverance, and unsurprisingly, politicking! Your friend seemed to have lost all three edges. For continuous, thorough discussion, 11 PM is my only available start time (the night is still young.) Students do this once every six to eight months, and me, almost weekly. Sound fair?


!!
等級:8
留言加入好友
夜安
2009/11/02 00:15

愛德華的剪刀手?

我好奇誰能幫他梳頭呢?   大概祇剩上帝了吧!

我無意殘忍ㄜ

要在顯微鏡前審度己容

我恐怕昏得比那位可憐的同學更澈底

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-02 14:49 回覆:

照著折式的鏡子, 愛德華還可以結辮子呢 (上帝早西歸了)。毋須顯微審度, 只消給個好說法, 合理有證據, 就可過關。 


Apple *
等級:8
留言加入好友
Titanic??????
2009/11/01 23:47

Dear Sir:

I know exactly what you mean. I was not called "Dragon Lady" for nothing.

Discipline is not naturally born with many. For those who needed a push, I would not hesitate a bit.

But, I can see the warm tender heart behind the poker face of yours.

Why the music from Titanic? Just wondering....

Apple

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-02 14:40 回覆:

Dear Madam April,  

Some call hardworking a norm of life; we simply hold individuals against a same, unequivocal, high standard.  I have no clue about Titanic lyric played on this page. Maybe another kind soul embedded it w/o. my knowledge.

Best regards,

Kirk


等級:
留言加入好友
兔子問候
2009/11/01 19:53

看著文中一堆狼 嚇得兔子差點不敢進來

說是殘忍 該是淬煉 在這個適者生存的社會 是必修的課程 不管哪一行 哪一階層

差別於過程 層次之不同  你說是吧

 問安ㄛ


PinkCottonCandy
等級:8
留言加入好友
Hey ~
2009/11/01 13:22
You must be good enough to be so mean, Big Bad "Wolf"?!

I am not sure why this girl "blacked out" right in front of you guys,

but I surely can picture how tough you look to that shivering poor thing

who is not well-prepared.

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-01 19:09 回覆:

Ha! I have long been transformed into a hybrid of lamb, lion, monkey and pig. You are right about mature men having soft spots for those who prepare themselves well. I smile often though - a smiling lion at helm ...   I am very glad to see you back, lassie! 


Didi
等級:6
留言加入好友
殘忍
2009/11/01 08:57

先兵後禮

與狼共武

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-01 19:38 回覆:

兵, 人間實況; 禮, 文明規矩

狼, 分進合擊; 武, 生命真章


思于
等級:8
留言加入好友
很累
2009/10/31 21:32

這樣的修習學程

感覺很累

狠而無奈


思于
Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-01 19:34 回覆:

治學標準四海定則, 沒有折扣餘地, 何狠之有? 人間爭競, 分秒進行, 端看每人怎麼設目標, 求實行。


Valley
等級:7
留言加入好友
FWIW
2009/10/31 11:32

Asians seem to be obsessed with the idea that the more demanding the advisor is the better the students are. That is not necessarily true. Just look at how small the number of Nobel Prize winners is for Asia than USA or Europeans countries. Western professors are more focused on self-motivation. If a student works hard to achieve academic excellence in the highest education, that’s because s/he loves to and enjoys doing it and not because s/he is told (or forced) to

 

Whenever one is self-motivated, one is usually self-disciplined and has a passion for what one is doing. His potential is therefore unlimited

Sir Norton 魯賓遜,救命!(SirNorton) 於 2009-11-01 19:45 回覆:

Your last paragraph is plausible, but the former very questionable. You chose to ignore all major factors of excellent researching. Try to figure them out yourself and I will be happy to converse.

頁/共 5 頁  回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁