網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
illusory differences
2010/08/19 20:19:21瀏覽460|回應2|推薦4
There is very definitively an illusion, but there is no ground to which the illusion refers, nor is there any reason to imagine that the Madyamika's deconstructive analysis culminates in a brave new world of the spirit where all possibility of contradiction and diversity is resolved. We must turn the conversation from talk of resolution... to discussion of an insight or attention--a refined, purified love of this world--that never ceases to illuminate, destabilize, and simultaneously affirm differences which are themselves supported by other, suppressed forms of illusory differences.

--C.W. Huntington, "The Emptiness of Emptiness"
( 創作散文 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=ZYZY&aid=4336189

 回應文章

沙丘文學
等級:8
留言加入好友
I already understood
2010/08/20 15:31
I have understood, I only am have the different view to your this article? But your response, is acceptable. And thanks your suggestion.

沙丘文學
等級:8
留言加入好友
The idea is very good
2010/08/20 07:02
In other words, today' the s literary arts industry, is the urgent question? Must first have the area of knowledge, and is related fantasized that the basic situation, this has one kind of legitimate sufficient reason. Therefore periphery, how to regard our idea, is unimportant? But we must with this new vernacular literature time discussion. Discovered that your literature idea is very good, also gives you to affirm.
 
                       -Sha  Chfou-
ZY(ZYZY) 於 2010-08-20 12:33 回覆:
Actually, that's not my idea, nor is it about literature.  It was taken from a book on Buddhism, specifically the Middle Way.  The book discusses Nagarjuna and Chandrakirti, but applies the concepts of deconstruction. 

I am not a literary theorist, and don't really have much thought on literature from a theoretical angle.  I think theory can be very abstract and criticism is often far away from actual literary works.  On this, I am very old-fashioned--I think practical criticism focusing on specific text is more useful than generalization.