字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2019/10/29 03:30:30瀏覽783｜回應0｜推薦13 | |
| 「曠野」節譯
無際底曠野天際只屬我一人獨處，遠離人煙，無庸耽心擾及他人，他人更擾不及我。樂音震天價響，完全放鬆心情聆賞。世人己不能離棄現代社會生活及習俗地制約，縱試著讓靈魂孤離自處，沒有報紙，沒有網路，試用自己的想像，不再讓外在或別人提供素材讓你殺時間，然而因之養成意識仍無能須臾片刻遠離所住入並因之由來的自我。 傾吐情感或壅塞情緒的樂曲使人由感傷而喜悅或激昂及動情，然對我而言具像底寄情的樂音層次上絕無法和能抽離音像的古典樂曲或器樂匹配。我的信仰觀亦如是，雖無從拿音樂來比喻思想，然一時掠忽而過的印象，讓我覺得有些可證同之處。按人本身形象模擬創造的神，絕不會是高於人本身的崇拜對象。神既是至高無上，超越人及其思想，人就無從以自己的想像和模擬來造作一個超越他的神祇出來， 以人類自身形象投影出的神祇絕無從超出越人本身自己。偶像崇拜永不能引領我走向宗教至高無上的敬畏，只有不具人格或形象底抽象的但無所不在底神格才激盪起我的宗教屬性與想像。 現有既成的環境及事實乃事物環繞底自我之幽暗中心，然如果人底存活，就是單純底繼續存活或者只為著一代代持續綿延像所有的生物一樣，那麼大可不需如此麻煩於生存下去。生命意義若僅只是不斷絕底自我延續，神的意志若僅止於此，人又有何所有期待，並以之為倚賴呢？ 丹麥哲學家齊克果以為我們心中若未存有永恆，則一代代人不斷地綿延，有如森林中之落葉，一層層地堆積下去，毫無意義。然而永恆可持否？人對永恆的指望究係為何？天國的意義究竟何所在？永續存在的真締難道仍只為延續世上的生命？然而永恆可持否？或者如同宗教指渉的永續存在於天堂？天堂的含義就是快樂嗎？可是人類對快樂的定義是由感官得來的滿足，這種感覺需要永續保有嗎？ 值得一直保有嗎？ The horizon of the endless wilderness is only one of me alone, away from people, and I don’t want to disturb others. Others can’t disturb me. The music sounds loud and the price is completely relaxed. The world can no longer abandon the constraints of modern social life and customs. Try to keep the soul alone, without newspapers, without internet, try your own imagination, no longer let the outside or others provide materials for you to kill time, but because The awareness of growing up is still incapable of staying away from the moment the self that lives in and originates from it. Music that pours or seduce emotions makes people feel sentimental and joyful or passionate and emotional. however, for me, the tone level with the bottom of the scene must not match the classical music or instrumental music that can be extracted from the sound. My beliefs are also like this. Although I cant use music to metaphorize my thoughts, the impression that I suddenly passed by, makes me feel that there are some similarities. The god created by the image of the person itself will never be higher than the object of worship. God is supreme, transcending man and his thoughts, and therefore man cannot make a god beyond him by his own imagination and simulation. The gods projected in the image of human beings never exceed the people themselves. Idol worship can never lead me to the supremacy of religion. Only the abstract but omnipresent godhead that does not have a personality or anthropomorphic image excites my religious attributes and imaginations. The existing environment and facts are the dark centers of things around the bottom of the self. However, if the human beings survive, they simply continue to survive or continue to stretch like all creatures for generations, so there is no need to be so troublesome to survive. If the meaning of life is only continuous and self-sustaining, if God’s will only ends here, what expectations do people have and rely on it? The Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard thought that if there is no eternity in our hearts, then generations will continue to stretch, like the leaves in the forest, pile up layer by layer, meaningless. But can it be eternal? What is the reason for peoples eternal expectations? What is the meaning of the kingdom of heaven? Is the true existence of perpetuity still only for the life of the world? Or is it like a religious guide that exists in heaven forever? Is the meaning of heaven happy? But human beings definition of happiness is the satisfaction of the senses. Does this feeling need to be preserved forever? Is it worth keeping it all the time? |
|
| ( 創作｜小說 ) |
