網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇  字體:
DF-21D Missile
2014/07/31 00:23:00瀏覽418|回應1|推薦3

"In Chinas Sight: A new missile threatens the U.S. Navys biggest warships---and stability in the Pacific." is a long report of this weeks TIME.  The story reveals how have Chinas DF-021D missiles(DF stands for Dong Feng, 東風) become the biggest concern to the U.S. mighty carriers, the new Ford class in the vast Pacific Ocean.  I did read many a relevant report about DF-021D in Chinese websites, including in that popular "天下縱橫談", but this is the very first time that I saw it reported on a mainstream non-military magazine from US perspectives.  I hope you could also read it if you are interested in.  Here I would like to recpitulate the main points that the report was trying to convey. 

TIME attributes the realization of DF-021D has been the humiliation that China suffered from the inicident of 95/96 when she launched missiles to the northern and southern sea of Taiwan, warning that Jap Li not to seek Taidu by the so-called universal suffrage on Taiwans presidential election.  Then U.S. dispatched two carriers to "peer" in Chinese windows from the seas, and so China pulled back.  Thanks to the stupidities Li made, which spurred Mainland on speeding up her renovations to the military technologies. (She would have upgraded her weapons anyway regardless there was such a stimulus.) 

The DF-021D could hold U.S. carriers at bay by keeping them beyond the fleets F-18 warplanes( even the attack bombers F-35) unrefueld range.  The truck-carried missles could fly as far as 900 miles, while the U.S. most advanced planes could only fly 700 miles unrefueled.  That means U.S. carrier fleets must stay at least 1,000 miles away from Chinas coast in case a Sino-American conflict (or a war) is taken place.  But do the missiles work?  Are they able to hit a moving target?  The U.S. Navy says it "believes China has harnessed the space-based intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, command and control structure and ground processing capabilities" that make the missile work.  Besides, China had already proved that she was able to use the similiar missile in destroying an obsolete weather satelite that was orbiting the planet, which speed was much faster than the carrier at a full speed of 30 knots on the sea. 

Cant U.S. fleets defend themselves by hitting down those misslies whenever necessary?  Well, its a concept of asymmetric warfare.  The cost of a DF-21D, including its launcher on a truck, is at most $11 million, while a future Ford-class carrier will cost $13.5 billion, let alone the likewise expensive planes it carries.  Therefore, China could produce 1,227 DF-21D missiles at the cost of a single U.S. Ford-class aircraft carrier.  How can the carrier defend drove of sophisticated missiles up from skies?  So, according to the magazine, the U.S. Navy urges that a smaller but faster fleet be built up to replace the war platform which belongs to 20th century.  

I dont care what U.S. think about; I just care about what the islanders on Taiwan would think about.  All I can say is: "Wake up and get real, the advocates to Taidu or Dutai, dont you just bank on your Big Brother because it cant protect you any longer."   

( 不分類不分類 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=kkuo0810&aid=15561891

 回應文章

reaizuguo*😻
等級:8
留言加入好友
A Triumph
2014/07/31 04:21

That is definitely a triumph for 中華民族。 When DF-21D strike a carrier at a speed of 10 mach or so, any anti-missile technique will become void.  

Even more ,
     美媒:中國反衛星技術咄咄逼人美日坐不住   
China's anti-satellite system will essentially disarm the U.S. should they take military actions against China.


Retiredbum(kkuo0810) 於 2014-07-31 10:54 回覆:
China possesses a larger pool of engineers, scientific researchers and cheap labour; therefore, there is no reason for China not to be able to edge on anybody else in the world. It's just a matter of time.

BTW, I already stored www,CRNTT.com in "My favorites", thanks!