字體:小 中 大 | |
|
|
2011/01/30 19:16:26瀏覽748|回應1|推薦2 | |
話說蔣光頭時代不斷灌輸我們 [榮譽是軍人第二生命] , 鄙人不禁好奇追問 [什麼才是軍人的第一生命] ? 近日 [空軍將領/軍官栽贓污陷, 殺人滅口 --- 以求升官發財] 的醜聞 *1 終於再度浮出台面. 原來唾面自乾的這批軍官們奉行著 [軍人第一生命 -- 不擇手段也要升官發財! ] . 在進一步探討之前不妨看個例子 - Jeremy Michael Boorda . 美國海軍軍令部長因為多佩帶一枚勳獎而舉槍自盡 v.s. 中華民國空軍司令因為栽贓污陷而升官發財. 這就是中外軍人對於 [榮譽是軍人第二生命] 的看法差異. 江國慶冤案發生地的中華民國如果拖了14年的冗長調查之後還是無法對於蓄意栽贓殺人的眾涉案軍官 [速審速決], 還是無法對於干涉軍方調查的前台北市長陳水扁提出聯帶處分, 還是堅持 [和稀泥/扮爛好人/當不沾鍋] 的搞國家賠償 -- 把 [軍官栽贓殺人滅口] 的事實當成 [正常辦案程序]. 要知道我們這些平民百姓 -- 誰都沒命令空軍作戰司令陳肇敏搞殺人滅口的把戲 (力求政績的阿扁市長例外), 而且涉案的空軍軍官們個個藉機升官發財的時候平民百姓也沒分到半點好處. 何以東窗事發之時, 馬震怒先生就打算拿出最拿手的不沾鍋絕技. 借著國家賠償的手段, 懲罰我們這些毫無決定權的平民百姓. 反而讓恬不之恥/唾面自乾的軍官們既不必面對軍法審判, 還可繼續坐領高薪厚祿!? 假設馬震怒先生真的 [不沾鍋我自為之] . 其實這樣決定也很好, 假設 [榮譽是軍人第二生命] 那馬震怒先生領倒政府所做出的國賠決定 -- 剛好証實了 [軍人第一生命 -- 不擇手段也要升官發財! ] 的合理推論! ******************************************************************************** *1 江國慶案 http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%B1%9F%E5%9C%8B%E6%85%B6%E6%A1%88 1996年9月12日15時20分,空軍作戰司令部福利站員工的五歲幼女被人發現陳屍在福利站後方的廁所,下體大量流血。 此一事件造成輿論一致要求軍方應迅速破案。面對壓力,空軍總部立刻組成「0912專案小組」(包括鍾仁良、李書強、陳先民、吳國平、翁基鴻、周大文、何祖耀、譚寶玲、柯仲慶、許榮彰、李少康、朱慎光、藍仁智、李植仁、鄧鎮環等15人[2])進行調查,當時的臺北市長陳水扁亦限期軍方一個月內破案[3]。軍方約談了福利站的員工和士兵,卻毫無進展。軍事檢察官和法醫於交誼廳的櫃檯上發現一把疑似作案用的兇刀,上沾有血跡。軍方隨即展開調查,最後過濾出包含江國慶在內的四名士兵有涉案嫌疑。 10月1日,調查局對福利站的員工和支援士兵實施測謊檢測,結果只有江國慶一人未通過。10月2日晚間,江國慶被送到禁閉室由專案人員的「反情報總隊」少校保防官鄧震環及上尉保防官何祖耀進行連續37小時的疲勞訊問和刑求逼供迫使他自白[4],並於10月4日寫下自白書。10月22日被軍法起訴,但江國慶卻在11月5日初審時翻供,聲稱是遭到刑求才承認犯案。12月26日,初審被以強姦殺人罪判處死刑。 1997年3月27日,國防部覆審,以證據不足及江國慶遭刑求為由,撤銷判決發回更審,但空軍作戰司令部仍交由前次相同的三位軍法官審理,並於6月17日判處死刑。8月13日,江國慶於桃園縣八德市懷生基地被執行槍決,死時雙眼睜大,死未瞑目。江父簽名領屍時寫下「天無公理」四字,隨後十數年為證明兒子的清白而四處奔波,直至江父往生後,全案才得以翻案[5][6][7]。 軍方偵辦人員 資料來源:監察院[21]
******************************************************************************** *2 Jeremy Michael Boorda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Michael_Boorda Stan Arthur incident Boorda faced unrelenting hostility from a majority of Naval flag officers who believed that Boorda had betrayed the Navy by allying himself with Clinton administration demands for reform of the Navy's officer corps in the wake of the Tailhook scandal. Naval aviators, in particular, were incensed by the treatment of Stan Arthur (Vice Chief of Naval Operations and senior Naval aviator), whose nomination for the post of Commander, United States Pacific Command was withdrawn by President Clinton at the behest of Senator David Durenberger of Minnesota.[5] Durenberger raised questions over Arthur's possible mishandling of sexual harassment allegations brought by one of the Senator's constituents, a female student Naval aviator named Rebecca Hansen, who was attrited from flight training.[6][7] It was reasonable to expect protracted hearings to ensue, and the Pacific Command position to remain unfilled during them; Arthur decided to retire from the Navy on February 1, 1995 as a four-star admiral. Boorda issued an unusual public defense of Arthur and his decision not to fight for the nomination, saying
DeathBoorda died May 16, 1996 of an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound to the chest.[8] The autopsy results were not released to the public. He reportedly also left two suicide notes, neither of which was released publicly.[9] He was reported to have been despondent over a news media investigation, led by David Hackworth, into Valor device enhancements he wore on his Navy Commendation Medal and Navy Achievement Medal (small bronze "V" devices, signifying valor in combat), which the media report claimed he was not entitled to wear. Former CNO Elmo Zumwalt, who was Boorda's commander in Vietnam, later indicated that Boorda was authorized to wear them.[10] In 1998, one of Boorda's sons requested a review of his service record. The Board for Correction of Naval Records, the ultimate arbiter of whether Boorda was entitled to wear the Combat V on both Medals, determined that he was not.[11] Boorda was survived by his wife, Bettie Moran Boorda, four children, and 11 grandchildren. ******************************************************************************** *3 NAVY'S TOP OFFICER COMMITS SUICIDE : MAGAZINE QUESTIONED VIETNAM MEDALS.Defense Department officials said the 57-year-old admiral left behind two suicide notes, both suggesting that he had been driven to take his life by fear that the reputation of the Navy, which has been battered in recent years by a series of scandals, would be further harmed by the disclosures about his medals.
******************************************************************************** http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Valor_device.jpg |
|
( 時事評論|公共議題 ) |