David Martin在歐盟議會新冠高峰會議的報告(上)

新冠病毒不是三年前才有

新冠疫苗也不是三年前緊急做出

具傳染性可複製有缺陷的新冠病毒是種生化武器

我今天的角色要為歷史設下對話的基礎， 這個疫情不是始於3年前，也不是始於5、6年前。這是個一直在持續的事，早在1900年最早就在這裡，歐洲，確定在1913，1914年在中歐這裡。

🌿過去三年的疫情不是一夜之間發生。

事實上，這次這個以新冠病毒展開的非常特殊的疫情，開始於一個非常不同的時期，(會議中有投影片，影片中看不到)

早在1965年新冠病毒就被分離出來當病原體模型。

早在1965年新冠病毒就被認定是第一個具傳染性，可複製性的病毒模型之一，可用於修正人類狀況的一系列其他經歷。

它曾經被分離出來是要研究普通感冒相關的事，但特別有趣的是1965年分離出的，立即被確認是一種病原體，可以用於修改很多東西。

對，沒錯，早在1965年，這些投影片資料都是公開的，歡迎隨時自行查證裏頭的參考資料，都是公開資料。 (18:13)

早在1966年，就有了第一個COV新冠病毒模型被用來操縱人類的跨洲生物實驗。

你聽到年份了，1966年，我希望你有抓到重點，

這不是一夜之間發生的事，

而是醞釀很久的事

我出生前一年，美國和英國第一次跨洲共享新冠病毒相關的實驗資料。

1967年我出生那一年，則進行第一次人體試驗，以修正過的新冠病毒為人們接種。

🌿對話在哪裡

這不是太神奇了嗎？

56年前，一個病原體被分離修正了56年，然後一夜之間成名，

我要問的是：

當有人就這樣違反生化武器條款時，我們在哪裡？

身為人類，當我們以為病原體就這樣被人為打造出來是可接受時，我們在哪裡？

對話在哪裡

應該有那些對話

1967年

沒有對話

諷刺的是，普通感冒在1970年代成了嵌合體。

🌿開始把新冠病毒放到不同動物

1975、1976和1977年，我們開始在研究怎麼修改新冠病毒，放到不同動物、豬、狗身上，一點都不令人訝異，到了1990年，人們發現新冠病毒可以作為一種傳染源，兩個主要對象，狗和豬。

🌿新冠疫苗的源起

養狗養豬的人發現新冠病毒造成胃腸問題，這成了輝瑞第一個刺突蛋白為主的疫苗的由來，為此申請專利。準備好了嗎？

1990年，你聽清楚我說的嗎？

1990年 (川普說的)曲速行動

不好意思，哪來的彎曲哪來的速度？

輝瑞早在1990年就有了第一個以刺突蛋白為主的新冠疫苗。

這不是很神奇嗎？

這不是很神奇嗎？

因為我們被告知刺突蛋白是新東西，

不是的

事實上，我們只是不知道而已。

我們現在才知道早在1990年就有第一個以刺突蛋白為主的新冠疫苗，還為此申請了專利。（21：12）

誰會想到就是輝瑞呢？

顯然，看來無辜的製藥廠，他們的發展是為了人類的健康，

但顯然就是輝瑞

這家公司不買票的，在歐盟議會，在世界各地的議會。他們不做這樣的事

但是他們做到了。

🌿疫苗越打病毒越變種

1990年他們發現疫苗有問題

沒有效用

你知道為什麼沒有效用嗎

事實證明新冠病毒很具可塑性，

會轉變，

會改變，

會隨著時間變異，

事實上，1990年到2018年，每一份關於新冠疫苗的出版物，每一份出版物，都得到結論，#新冠病毒會從疫苗逃脫，#因為它的修正和變異度太快，#疫苗無法有效。

各位，1990到2018年，這是已發表的科學。

遵照科學的作法。

遵循科學是他們標榜的遊戲規則，他們自己說了疫苗沒有效用。

是數以千計的出版物喔，不是只有幾百篇，也不是製藥公司付費叫人寫的，這些出版物來自獨立科學研究機構，明確指出，包括北卡羅萊納大學所做的嵌合體修改，都顯示疫苗對新冠病毒起不了作用。

要講科學這就是科學。

科學的兩邊從未來回辯駁過。

然後，到了2002 年，有了有趣的發展，

這年很重要，

因為在2002年，北卡羅來納大學申請專利，

我引用出版物的話

🌿一個具傳染性，複製性，有缺陷的新冠病毒複製物

注意聽這些用字喔....

傳染性、複製性、有缺陷、

到底是什麼意思？

對於不熟悉這類用字的人，

我來解釋

傳染性、複製性、有缺陷、

的意思就是一種武器

代表某樣東西針對某個個人，但對其他人可能不造成連帶損害，

這就是傳染性複製性有缺陷的意思

待續....

註：請引述出處💕謝謝，如果沒有，這份貼文有其時間記載

完整版：

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ

My role today is to set the stage for the conversation in a historical context, BECAUSE THIS DID NOT COME IN THE LAST 3 YEARS, this did not come in the last 5 or 6 years, 

This is actually an on going question, that probably began here in Europe, in the early stages of the mid 1900, but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in central Europe.

The pandemic we alleged to have happened in the last 3 years also did not happen overnight. 

In fact, this very specific pandemic, using corona virus, began in a very different time, we’ll try to advance several slides here, one of these things, up, there we go. 

Most of you don’t know the corona virus, as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. 

Corona virus was identified 1965 as one of the first infectious, replicable, viral models, that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of human condition. It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold, but what’s particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that, it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons.

And you heard me correctly that it was in 1965, and by the way, these slides are public domain, you are welcomed to look at every single reference, every comment that I’ve made, is based on public material. So, do make sure you look at those references. (18:13)

But, in 1966, the very first COV, corona virus model, was used as an transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. 

You heard the date, 1966, I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying, 

This is not an overnight thing, 

This is actually something that’s been long in the making, 

A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment, between the united states, and the United Kingdom.

And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials, on inoculating people with modified corona virus.

Isn’t that amazing?

56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that’s been 56 years in engineering, and I want to chill with all of you, 

Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties?

Where were we, as a human civilization, when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States, and in fact, the world with it? 

Where was that conversation? 

And what should have been that conversation? 

In 1967.

That conversation wasn’t had.

Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera, in the 1970s. 

In 1975, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus, by putting it into different animals, pigs, dogs, and not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that the coronavirus as an infectious agent, was an industrial problem, for 2 primary industries. The industries for dogs and pigs. 

Dog breeders and pigs found that the coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer’s first spike protein vaccine patent, filed, are you ready for this? 

In 1990, did you hear what I’ve just said? 

1990 operation warp speed

I’m sorry, 

Where is the warp, and the speed?

Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus.

Isn’t that fascinating?

Isn’t that fascinating that we were told that the spike protein is new thing, we’ve just found out that’s the problem. 

No,

As a matter of fact, we didn’t just find out it was not just now the problem.

We’ve found that in 1990 and filed the first patent on vaccines in 1990, for the spike protein for the coronavirus, (21:12)

Who would have thought, Pfizer? 

Clearly, the innocent organization, that does nothing, but promote human health, 

Clearly, Pfizer 

The organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber, in every chamber of every government around the world. 

Not that Pfizer

Certainly they wouldn’t have had anything to do with this. 

But, OH yes, they did it. 

In 1990, they found out that there was a problem with the vaccine. 

They didn’t work.

You know why they didn’t work?

It turns out the coronavirus is a very malleable model, 

It transforms,

It changes, 

It mutates over time,

As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that the coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse, because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. 

Since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen.

That’s following the science. 

Following the science is their own indictment, of their own programs, that said it doesn’t work. 

There are thousands of publications to that effect, not few hundreds, and not paid for by the pharmaceutical company, these are the publications that are independent scientific research, that show unequivocally, including efforts of the chimera modifications, made by Ralph Barrick in the university of the North Carolina chapel hill, all of them show vaccines-do-not-work on coronavirus. 

That’s the science.

And that science has never been disputed.

Then, we had interesting development in 2002, 

This date is most important, 

Because in 2002, the university of north Carolina chapel Hill, patented,

I quote

An infectious replication defective clone of the coronavirus

Listen to these words,….

Infectious, replication, defective, 

What does that phrase actually mean?

For those of you who are not familiar with language, 

Let me unpack for you

Infectious, replication, defective,

Means….a weapon

It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individual, 

That’s what infectious replication defective means