字體:小 中 大 | |
|
|
2021/09/13 16:16:58瀏覽383|回應0|推薦6 | |
有關新冠疫情一連串的自問自答
by Robert Malone
💚問你自己一個問題,「為什麼美國要施打這個追趕不上的(新冠)疫苗,當很多人都已經感染、恢復,也生成自然免疫力時?」。
停下來。
想一下。
為什麼社群網站要事實查核?
為什麼政府要強制施打?
為什麼強力宣傳接二連三?
💚 「天然免疫力需要進一步研究這個說法是個推拖與干擾。資料很清楚,邏輯也很清楚。#天然免疫力所提供的保護比那些只有單一抗原的基因疫苗要優秀太多太多。」
💚抵達義大利這裡,我看到,事實上,義大利入境不需接種疫苗。他們只要求出示疫苗接種紀錄或 #從感染恢復的證明。因為他們知道天然免疫力等同/甚至遠遠好過單一抗原的基因疫苗。
💚你要人家告訴你做什麼,
還是希望靠自己的睿智。
這是我們目前的處境。
看要捍衛自由,還是繳納自由。
沒有人能幫你做,你必須做出選擇,根據那個選擇行事。
或者跟澳洲人一樣,失去選擇的自由。
💚下一個問題,對我而言顯而易見,或許是我的偏見。為什麼政府與媒體同步把伊維菌素講成不安全的動物用藥,但這兩個組織的說法顯然都是錯的。為什麼還是有那麼多人信媒體那一套?
💚為什麼我要耐心丟出一連串問題,而不是直接給答案?
1) 駭客任務裏的紅色藥丸,蘇格拉底所言:「我唯一知道的就是我不知道,而你們也不知道,但是你們不知道自己不知道」。
2)某個時點我會離開 ,因為我也沒有所有的答案。我想引導你去思考。
3) 無法在平台上發表意見/帳號遭停用或註銷是一種危險。
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1436894062674595842?s=19
註:這篇貼文是把Robert Malone在推特一連串的短篇發文拼貼成完整文章。他屬於快人快語的學者,想到什麼就丟什麼,速度很快。跟凡事穩紮穩打要想清楚才講話的學者風格迥異。
同樣地,也入選維基百科新冠疫情下散播不實謠言的學者名單,在此時節感覺是種殊榮啊!
Please ask yourself, "Why is the USA requiring vaccination for all with an outdated vax, when many have already been infected, recovered, developed natural immunity?".
Stop.
Think.
Why the censorship?
Why the mandates?
Why the constant propaganda push?
"Natural immunity needs to be studied" is a ploy and a distraction. The data are clear, as is the logic. Protection afforded by natural immunity is far superior to genetic vaccination with a single antigen, but still not completely protective.
Upon arrival here in Italy I learned that, in fact, they do not require vaccination for entry. They require either vaccination OR evidence of recovery from infection, because they recognize natural immunity is equivalent or better to genetic vaccination with a single antigen.
Do you wish to be told what to do, or do you wish to rely on your own wits. Because that is where we are at. Defend liberty or submit. I cannot do this for you. You must make a choice and act on that choice. Or become like the Aussies and loose your freedom to choose. ckw
Next question, which seems obvious to me, but maybe I am biased. Why did you see an enormous synchronized push by media and government to label Ivermectin as an unsafe horse medicine when both assertions are clearly false? And why did so many buy into that media theme (meme)?
Why do I use patient questioning, rather than just "telling you the answer"?
1) Proven method to "red pill" (developed by Socrates). 2) I will be gone at some point - and do not have all the answers. I am trying to trigger you to think for yourself. 3) Deplatforming is a risk.
|
|
( 知識學習|健康 ) |