筍子,
tks for the post. I used the auto
translate of Google into Engslih and
print it out to show Prof. Secrest
about this official statement.
that would shut his mouth of critisism
of the relation ship between China and
Tibet.
....."I just know that Britain is not always recognized that Tibet is the territory of the People's Republic of the sacred and inalienable part of the in the United Kingdom prior to the publication of the official Chinese map, Chinese white, Tibet is certainly different from white to show, said Britain China's Tibet only "suzerainty" and not "sovereignty."
•
10月底英国外交大臣戴维米利班德在一份几乎没有引起人们注意的议会声明中，宣布了英国承认中国主权的立场发生历史性变化。 By the end of October, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said in a little draw attention to the parliamentary statement, Britain announced the recognition of Chinese sovereignty over the position of historic change. 他在声明中说："像其它每一个欧盟成员国以及美国一样，我们视西藏为中华人民共和国的一部分。"并称，英国过去的政策是"时代错误"（哎呀，老牌帝国主义开始承认历史的错误了）。 He said in a statement: "Like every other EU member states and the United States, we regard Tibet as a part of the People's Republic of China." Adding that Britain's policy in the past, "anachronism" (Ah, the old and started to recognize the history of imperialism The error). 对于所谓的英国承认中国的"宗主权"而不承认中国对西藏的"主权"的说法，米利班德表示，整个"宗主权"的概念已经过时。 The so-called Britain's recognition of China's "suzerainty" and not to recognize China's Tibet "sovereignty", Miliband said that the "suzerainty" out of date. 他说，英国"非常肯定地"承认西藏是中华人民共和国的一部分】 He said Britain was "very sure" of recognizing Tibet as a part of the People's Republic of China】
(16112008。) (16,112,008.)....."