|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Dr. Eric Berg |
|
2018/03/21 04:04 |
The Truth About Cholesterol - and LDL and HDL
懇請不吝賜教？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 治病？還是害命？ |
|
2016/05/09 22:03 |
|
電視上光看好多藥物的反應，就夠嚇死人了！！
|
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2016-05-09 22:59 回覆： |
|
所言甚是 !
凡药三分毒 ? !
|
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2022-09-05 22:01 回覆： |
|
降低膽固醇的Statins其實有副作用？ https://health.udn.com/health/story/6012/6587807 (Ten Drugs ~ Thomas Hager)
Statins最常見的副作用如下：
◆ 肌肉疼痛與無力
◆ 糖尿病
◆ 記憶喪失與認知問題
罕見卻嚴重得多的副作用則包括：
◆ 橫紋肌溶解症（嚴重的肌肉損壞，可能導致腎衰竭）
◆ 肝臟損傷
◆ 帕金森氏症
◆ 失智症
◆ 癌症
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| cholesterol’s function. |
|
2016/04/30 00:06 |
Our livers produce cholesterol and will reduce its production when we consume foods with cholesterol. Thus, in normal condition our body should have a balance of cholesterol to properly function as follow:
1). Low Density Cholesterol (LDL) to bind fate and carry them in our blood steam and transport the fate to all part of our body. We have bad name for fate but it’s required for our survival. We also have a bad name for LDL- “Bad Cholesterol”. But imagine we don’t have LDL then we would all die. 2). High Density Cholesterol (HDL)- This is the cholesterol picking up those fates drop in our blood steam by LDLs when them transport those fate for our body. They theory is that we don’t want too much fate dropping in our blood steam to clog blood vessels. LDL fate binding is not perfect thus we have HDL acting as cleaner.
Thus there is no so called good or bad cholesterol. And what is properly level of HDL and LDL also become an issue debatable. Once this ratio, namely, (LDL+HDL +some part of Trigylcerides)/ HDL was widely use to gauge whether we going to have problem or not. But I don’t see this number showing up on blood test Lipitor panel report anymore. Maybe this is also a part of new thinking.
By the way you mention taken Lipitor from Merck. I believe Lipitor (atorvastatin) is made by Pfizer. Side effect like cram is quite often when take so call “statin” medicine.
Hope this will not confuse you more.
|
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2016-04-30 00:14 回覆： |
|
Thanks ....
听說 Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), ubiquinol, ubiquinone 可 消除 腿抽筋 ? !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 理解錯了 |
|
2016/04/29 19:49 |
這是一般人理解錯了
：新指南只是說從食從物中攝取的膽固醇對血液的膽固醇水平影響不大。
高膽固醇血症仍然是心血管病的危險因素。有心腦血管病危險的人，仍需降血膽固醇。
差之毫釐，謬以千里。
請不要相信，傳播錯誤觀念。
|
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2016-04-29 19:56 回覆： |
|
哦 ? !
世上常有完全相反的理論, 都對. 例如, 妳說往東, 他說往西, 豈不是180度 完全相反, 可都能到美國 (殊途同歸, 條條大路通羅馬). 哈, 地球是圓的 ?
『東西, 非東西, 是名東西』 http://blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/267010 item 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 膽固醇药 Lipitor |
|
2016/04/29 00:17 |
|
老媽吃了十多年，去年才停止！
我的膽固醇240上下，四十年來不變，也拒絕服藥！
敬請人道支援 我卓越不群的母親八旬阿嬤【台灣司法◎人間煉獄】部落格 |
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2016-04-29 20:02 回覆： |
|
吃 / 不吃 → Seems make no difference ?
世上常有完全相反的理論, 都對. 例如, 妳說往東, 他說往西, 豈不是180度 完全相反, 可都能到美國 (殊途同歸, 條條大路通羅馬). 哈, 地球是圓的 ? 『東西, 非東西, 是名東西』. http://blog.udn.com/mbr8879576/267010
|
|
摸 象 或 (不?) 著 木目(mbr8879576) 於 2019-07-01 09:35 回覆： |
|
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325567.php
Victoria Zigmont and team examined the health records of 4,683 men and women who were diabetes-free at the start of the study but were at risk of heart disease. Of the total number of participants, 16% — or 755 people — were taking prescription statins at the start of the study, in 2011. The study ended in 2014. The analysis revealed that people who took statins were more than twice as likely to receive a diabetes diagnosis than those who did not take the medication. Additionally, people who took statins for longer than 2 years were more than three times as likely to develop diabetes.
『持續服用史他汀的人比起沒有服用的人，得到糖尿病的機率高出一倍。服用史他汀超過兩年者，得到糖尿病的機率是沒有服藥者的三倍。這樣的結果讓研究人員認為，服用史他汀與患糖尿病之間是有關連性的。』
|
|
|
|
|
字體：小 中 大
