序言:共產黨開會,不說共產黨好處,難道要說美國共和黨好處嗎?所以,關鍵點應該是:終結歷史,放棄對立

思考中國國家主席胡錦濤先生：終結兩岸對立,撫平歷史創傷!

中國未來的國家民主化政策

12082011 posted by 窮小子

思考中國國家主席胡錦濤先生：終結兩岸對立,撫平歷史創傷!

中國未來的國家民主化政策

感想概論僅是個人觀點來研讀:終結歷史,放棄對立;
本文前言:
平心而論,中國的未來如何面對政治改革的挑戰;
特別是,面對來自依照歷史,文化和哲學,包括,宗教原則倡議來保證促進中國社會和政治改革的個人與團體;
顯而易見地,可能會破壞國家政策和發展;
不可否認,全球民主化發展,促進國家進步,但是,也讓國家領導面臨問題:
什麼模式下適合未來中國的政治改革?
難道中共轉移政權能夠說明?
平心而論,這是一個大問題和長期以來研讀許多學者的納悶?
如果,中共跳脫歷史打開自己的政治制度和尊重的步驟?
如果成功?這才會受益因為這是壓力改革
今天,關鍵因素在強大的政治力量,特別是,民主潮流,不僅,影響國家外交政策,也包括,國家軍事力量和存在;
換句話說,可能噫測中共的態度將如何應對未來促進國家民主化的政策趨勢?格外是三大區域存在問題?
也能夠噫測在國家安全的優先順序上,以政治自由來打擊極端主義和力量;
所以,選舉應該會開放和接受選舉結果,格外是,加強國家權力中心的政治立場來支持放棄歷史暴力的個人和團體;
簡單來說,非暴力歷史的個人和團體以和平模式來參與國家政治共同來面對挑戰;
這將可能是中共未來國家民主化的方向來促進國家區域戰略,特別是,處理個人和團體意見.

本文開始一:
中國的未來政治改革挑戰,應該是促進各省的政治參與自由;
因為,它是中國國家安全的優先考量,特別是,這不相關於歷史,文化和哲學等,政治自由下,打擊極端主義和輸入力量;
畢竟,國家政策是往前看,不論是,民主或中央集權;
這可能是一個問題,特別是,面對來自社會,宗教和歷史等的改革組織或個人的原則;
所以,回應其活動,將會是帶來給中國的未來挑戰;
簡單來說,想像中,中國未來的態度將會是如何運用在國家民主化下,重要的政策,格外是,三大運動;
有時候,壓力,可能起動新的國家的政治制度和尊重;
這大抵是一類現象反映在時間進程;
如果成功?國家將會受益;
這是一個強大的國家政治系統;
今天,許多的政黨組織和代表主要是反對,至少在語氣;
但對於國家未來政策關鍵還是支持,特別是,軍事行動;
選舉,但不能控制選舉結果來加強國家政治地位;
這應該是國家未來的挑戰,或如:特別是,以和平模式參與政治;
一,非暴力的老掉牙,歷史,文化和哲學者,歡迎與中共對話?
二,非暴力的自由主義的政黨組織和代表,支持參與國家民主化政治?
雖然,僅是噫測國家民主化方向,但促進還是在終結歷史,擺脫對立;
這也將進一步說明國家的區域戰略;
格外是,在處理組織和團體的問題;
然而,中國未來國家民主化的升級和面臨兩面刃的改變
未來國家民主化的升級應該是促使優先等級的國家安全;
可能以開放性政治自由來進行回應和降低,破壞,顛覆和極端歷史暴力主義;
當然耳容易懷疑國家民主化的實用性,和包括,中國的能力是否能夠應用在不同的國家地緣領域,加速國家和社會民主化改變的力量;
或許,這將是值得跳脫歷史的研究課題;
長期以來,謊話一直存在,也引起國家的煩惱,即使,國家民主化的實用性,承諾,誠意的深度,不受政府喜歡,不爽投入關注;
不可否認,是好是壞,不應該以政權來控制選舉結果和安撫要求;
換句話說,國家民主化是起動新世紀的政治制度和尊重原則,同步打擊,破壞,顛覆和極端歷史暴力主義;
簡單來說,不希望看到老掉牙在攻佔中國.

本文開始二:
國家政制改革,可能選擇或以和平模式來參與;
困境不轉彎,可能將會有不確定;
如果僅依據許多國際觀察家的說法,這應該是有一個灰色區域;
不可否認,這是被國家所允許,但會被限制參與國家政制,為什麼?
所以,兩面刃是選擇以和平參與國家政制;
另和諧改革似乎是合乎邏輯,但必須放棄恐怖和歴史,文化暴力主義,共同努力地促進國家民主化,這不是政黨民主化;
因為,它可能包括一切合法行為來要求權利;
畢竟,民主化在政黨和政治組織在很大程度上是不可能,至少是口號;
然而,中國的情況不同,特別是不同的地緣性格;
所以,國家民主化是一個高度,複雜的議題,也有許多懸而未決的歴史議題;
可能想像未來在鼓勵一個跨地緣的公正,自由的選舉;
可能會促進政治運動的提升;
國家民主化的努力和互動來顯示未來中國的政治現實,或如:
一,什麼是老掉牙的歴史,文化和哲學包括破壞,顛覆和極端历史暴力主義?如何定義合法的民主參與或好戰的基本教義?
二,保護中國的國家安全目標是至關重要,其關鍵,可能是,終結歴史打破對立的政治合作;
三,非暴力的個人或團體接受和歡迎對話?首先,終結歴史
四,國家民主化的目的不是政黨民主化的代名詞?

本文開始三:
平心而論,中國未來的國家民主化的核心思維,應該是國家地緣性格認同;
不可否認,這是作用在政治模式中,特別是,面對,少數民族,女性和宗教權利,基本上,解決政治身分;
現世的宮廷歴史,老掉牙的文化或西方的哲學,主要是喚醒丟臉的記憶;
所以,種族政治和共產主義,在很大程度上,以此補充中國的國家身分的真空;
所謂和諧改革者是追尋國家和社會的政治平衡和改革需求下的希望,以通用原則來建立和諧;
然而,基本教義者,當其是一種工具,同時操作選舉來建立自我優越的治理;
所以,今天,優先和不爽的政治身分在競爭;
基本教義者以知識分子的歴史和少數民族,宗教,特別是,經常與外國人合作;
因為其民主化的理想可能是接近於西歐和美國的自由民主制度;
但是,也經常是二等公民;
和諧改革者通常擁有國家許可來建立自我的國家性格認同來加強統治地位,可能也有民眾支持,特別是軍方;
大概,也因而建立一個軍事指導的執政當局下的共和國;
簡單來說,基於共同的神主牌來自其合法性;
不可否認,歷史文化和國家社會民主化的結合,可能幻想破滅;
因為,在全球化進程裡,苦難人群的意識和共鳴將會出現;

國家社會民主化,最終是,有利於執政當局,特別是,提供他們在有限的政治參與,簡單來說,包容.

感想概論結語:以文字想像,中國未來的國家民主化政策:
終結歷史,放棄對立

國家社會民主化是國家安全的優先選項;
然而,不爽思維不是ㄧ個重大威脅,換句話說,僅是學術爭議,不是國家政策所注意;
國家社會民主化是國家關鍵的戰略利益來發現更具有對抗性的方法;
換句話說,在一定模式,終結歴史,放棄對立;
重點推動區域改革,集中在改革實質內容,而不是象徵性的社會主義;這是國家戰略,通過操縱選舉,保持國會運作,主張象徵性的反對,公開和合法;
終結極端暴力歴史,放棄對立恐怖主義,以國家社會民主化,實現其政治目標的手段,和定位自己作為唯一的和諧替代可能支持的目標.


感想概論將會不定期更新

分隔線

China's statism-democratization policy for the future
Reflective summary is only an individual outlook to study:Ending of historymbreaking of confrontation.

Article preface:
Obviously speaking,how to meet China's future challenges by political reform,in particular,face that comes from history,culture and philosophy,including,religion of principles to initiate them,and in order to promise that will advance China's soceity and political reform by an individual and groups.There is mounting evidences said that,they may destroy national policies and developments.
It cannot denied that development of global democratization will advance nation in progress,but,it also make national leader have confronted issues:
What kind of pattern is good for China's political reform for the future?
Is it possible that Chinese Communist Party shifts political power,in which,can explain it?
Obviously speaking,it will be a big issue,and it has studyied from many of observers questions for a long time,since than.
If Chinese Communist Party will release history and open their political system,and respect with that steps?
If successful?
It will be benefit,that it will be pressure reform.
Today,the key of condion on powerful political force,in particular,democratic tendency,which will only influence national foreign policy,also,including,national military force and existence.So,it may imagine that how Chinese Communist Party attitude to respond promotion of national democratization policy in tendency for the future.
Especially,existent issues in three of regions.
It will also imagine that political freedom will attack extremism and force on the national security priority.
So,elections will probably to open,and accept elective result;especially,it will strengthen political position in core power of national leaders to support renounce historic violence of an individual and groups.
Simply speaking,non-historic violent of an individual and groups,whose have chosen to peacefully pattern participate in national politics,that work together to meet challenges.
It can imagine that it will be future direction of national democratization to promote nation of regional strategy,in particular,deal with the opinions by an individual and groups.

Article is beginning (1):
The future of China's political reform challenge should advance to participate in political freedom between each states.Because it is China's national security consideration in priority.In particular,it is not related to history,culture,philosophy,and so on.So,under the political freedom,attack the radicalism and implicative force.
After all national policies have moved forward,no matter what democracy,or centralization.It may be a issue.In particular,it meet that came from social,regional and histrorical of reform organizations,or individual principles,etc.So,how to responed to them that brings to China's challenges for the future.Simply speaking,in inagize,future of China's attitudes toward that how will use as in the most important policy,which under the national democratization,especially,three of movement.
Sometimes,the pressure will start new of national political systems and respect,in which,phenomenons are approximately to reflect on timly process,if successful,nation will benefit.It will be a the strongest national political systems.Today,many of political parties and organizations are extensively opposed, at least rhetorically.But,they will be toward to key of support in national policy for the future,in particular,military operation.
Elections,but,it cannot controlled the elective results,that have strengthened national political position.It should be national challenges for the future,as followed:In particular,it has used as peacefully participate in politics.
1,Nonviolent of out of sort of history,culture and philosophy,whose welcome dialogue with the China?
2,Nonviolent of liberalism of political parties and organizations,whose support to participate in the national democratization politics?
Although,it will only conjecture over the national democratization,but,it will be still in the end of history,break away from confronting positions,in which,also,will bring further explain nation's regional strategy,especially,the issue of dealing with organizations and groups.
Nonetheless,China's the national democratization of promotion,and meet the change of dilemma.
The future of the national democratization should have made the promotion of national security priority, that it may use as openness political freedom to ongoing response and reduce destruction,subversion and violence historical extremism.Of course,it will be easily to have questioned the practicality of national democratization,and including China's ability to be able to put in use whether or not,and the speed up nation and social of democratic change power in national geographic area.Perhaps that it will be ongoing research to worth in think outside of history.
Lies is still existence in long term,also,vexing nation.Despite that the practicality of national democratization,promise,sincerity in depth ,but,unfortunately,central government will not enjoy it,even,put in attention by out of sort.It cannot denied that,for better or for worse, which should not regime control elections,and calm demands for democratization.
In other words,national democratization will start new era of political systems and respect principles,and step by step,to attack destruction,subversion and violence historical extremism.
Simply speaking,it will not to see the out of date in "Occupy China".

Article is beginning (2):
National political reform may have chosen or used as been  peaceful pattern to participate;If predicament would not turn,it would probably to have problematic.
If it is only accordance with many international observers arguments,in which,it might have a gray area.And it cannot denied that it would be allowed,but,would be limited participation in natuonal politics. So,dilemma will choose ,and use as peaceful participation in national politics.
In addition,moderate reform seemed logical that they must surrendered terrorism and historical,culture violence,in order to effort advance national democratization,in which,not political party democratization.Because it may include all legitimate actors to ask for more rights.After all,democratization in the political parties and organizations are largely impossible.At least,it is only slogan.
Nonetheless,circumstances differ across China,in particular,differ across geographical characteristic.So,national democratization will be a highly,complex subject of debate,also,many outstanding historical subject of debate.
It may imagine that encourage clear and free elections across the geography of the future;
It may push political movement advance.
National democratization how promotion efforts interact to show that future of China's political realities.as followed:
1,What is the out of date of history,culture and philosophy,including,destruction,subversion and violence historical extremism?And how to define of legitimate democratic,or militant fundamentalists?
2,Protecting  other China's national security goals will probably more important,in which,in order to key of end of history,break opponency in political cooperation.
3,Non-violent an individual,or groups accept and welcome dialogue?At first,end of history.
4,The goal of National democratization efforts designed,which will not be alternative to political party.

Article is beginning (3):
Obviously speaking,the future core concept of China's statism-democratization policy should be national geography identity characteristic.And it cannot denied that the role in political pattern,in particular,to meet ethnic minorities,women,and religious rights.Basicly,to resolve politics identity.
Secular of imperial history,out of date of culture,or western philosophy,in which,having been largely disbelieved recollection.So,ethnic politics and communism have largely stepped in to fill national identity vacuum in the China.
So-called moderatism,whose hope that seeks nation and society under the balance and reform of politic,in order to use as general principles to establish moderate.Nonetheless,radicalism may use its as a tool,meanwhile,operate elections,that establishing self-superior of rule.
So,today,primacy and out of sort of politics identities in the competing.
Radicalism draw support from intelligentsia's history,and ethnic minorities,religious;in particular,whose are frequently of collaborating with foreigners.Because their democratization ideal may closely seem like the liberal democracies Western Europe and the United States.But,they have frequently been to second-class status.
In usually,moderatism have had national permission to build their own national characteristic identities,in order to intensify rule position.And it may also have people support.In particular,military.Perhaps that,also,as a result,they have built a republics controlled by one ruling administration and the military.Simply put,they have based their common ancestry from their legitimacy.
It cannot denied that combination of history cultural and national society democratization,that may disillusioned.Because a sense and resonant of populations suffering,whose will appear faceless in the process of globalization.

National society democratization,ultimately,benefits the ruling administration,in particular,to provide them limited participation in politics.Simply speaking,national toleration.

Reflective summary conclusion:
Article imagine that China's statism-democratization policy for the future.As followed:End of history,abandon confrontation.
National society democratization is seen as national security priority option.Nonetheless,uncomfortable concept is not as a significant threat.In other words,it is only an academic debate rather than national policy attention.
National society democratization is key of national strategic interests,that find more confrontational methods.
In other words,to the pattern extent that end of history,abandon opponency;the point is that push for regional reform,and focus on substantive elements of change rather than symbolic socialism.
This will be national strategy,in order to through manipulating elections,and keeping Congress operation,and contend symbolic opposition,operate openly and legally.
End of violence historical,abandon confrontation of terrorism,in order to use as national society democratization,to achieve as means of achieving their political goals.And than,positioning themselves as the only moderate alternative likely to support objectives.



Reflective summary will be upgrade in non-scheduled.


引述文誌如下: