版主：
我是在談記者會上郭台銘該給夏普的尊重
不是要尊重記者

郭台銘大可以在記者會上暢談他對台日記者的失望
但不尊重夏普則非常不足取!

如果此記者會是鴻夏共同記者會，且原訂由雙方董事長一起出席，郭台銘在記者會前未知會夏普，只剩夏普董事長出席記者會，才能說郭台銘不尊重夏普

這是美國華爾街日報如何處理這一條新聞:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444772804577621211944603398.html

......

Mr. Gou, chairman of Taiwan contract manufacturer Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., was a no-show on Thursday at a much-anticipated news conference called to highlight the positives of a partnership between his company and Sharp. He pulled out because the two sides weren't able to reach an agreement on a capital alliance in time, a Hon Hai official said. Mr. Gou is expected to continue his negotiations with Sharp executives Friday.

......

But as more than 100 reporters waited two hours for Mr. Gou's news conference at the plant, a spokeswoman for Hon Hai said he wouldn't be coming after all because of a change in schedule.

"We can't talk about where Terry Gou is," said Jen Wu Tai, a corporate vice president with Hon Hai, who was sent to speak to reporters in Mr. Gou's place.

"We'd like to support Sharp in whatever way we can. Sharp is an excellent Japanese company and we want to help Sharp continue operating," said Mr. Tai, who added that talks continue with Sharp but declined to provide any details.

......

一、記者會前，郭台銘個人有無承諾或公司有無發出新聞稿，郭台銘會親自出席記者會說明？

二、記者會前，郭台銘有無知會夏普，不親自出席記者會？

三、夏普董事長有無出席記者會？

版主:

郭台銘大可以在記者會上暢談他對台日記者的失望

但不尊重夏普則非常不足取!

==========

正確說這也不是他或任何發言人應該說的話，雖然我們都知道台灣媒體記者不作功課的壞習慣。

記者問甚麼問題就提供甚麼答案。  如果記者答非所問，可以回答一句"我們不討論假設性問題"或是"我不方便評論其他夥伴的決定"，更賴皮的可以說"我對這一點沒有評論"。

回答記者"你這問題太沒水準"是失禮的行為，拒絕出席並且在場外說"日本台灣記者太爛"則更糟。   台灣記者怎樣爛不是一天的事，事先知道對台灣日本媒體失望就不必同意召開記者會。

郭董聰明一些的話，這件事交給發言人就可以。  自己準備出馬表示對這件事的重視，臨時放媒體鴿子只透露了這個合作案子後面仍然問題重重。

記者沒事先研究這個購併計畫，就想要新聞，這也是缺乏基本的尊重。

新聞學原理沒教過記者在採訪前應該先徹底研究採訪對象嗎？