A conspiracy theory about the F-35 fighter jet is a microcosm of Europe’s waning trust in the Trump administration. 

F-35.有KILL SWITCH.裝置極為可能性在空中自我解體? 

..

This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, an increasingly unpredictable hegemon of Bloomberg Opinion’s opinions. On Sundays, we look at the major themes of the week past and how they will define the week ahead. Sign up for the daily newsletter here.

Kill Switch isn’t the worst-rated movie in the history of Rotten Tomatoes; there are at least 100 contenders ahead of it. Nor is the worst-reviewed film centering on an evil corporate conspiracy — LL Cool J took care of that with the Rollerball sequel. It’s not even the worst-rated movie in which a pilot must save the day — Nicolas Cage took care of that with Left Behind. But given Kill Switch’s 9% favorable rating1 on the Tomatometer,2I assumed that the credited director, Tim Smit, was simply an alternative version of the pseudonym filmmakers use to disavow their own work, Alan Smithee. But it turns out he’s a real person. No hard feelings, Tim, I hope.

..

.

Kill Switch: How the U.S. Can Shut Down Europe’s Military in an Instant.

.The “Kill Switch” is the hidden mechanism through which the U.S. retains control over military systems supplied to its allies. From F-35 fighter jets to HIMARS missile systems, Patriot air defenses, and even critical communications networks like Link 16, these systems can be remotely restricted or disabled by Washington. The recent example of the U.S. limiting Ukraine’s HIMARS range proves that even in active conflict, allies remain dependent on American approval. For Europe, this means that in a crisis – especially against a power like Russia – its ability to defend itself could be severely compromised. To achieve true Strategic Autonomy 2.0, Europe must not only develop independent defense capabilities but also ensure the freedom to act without U.S. permission.

Introduction

Recent statements and actions by U.S. President Donald Trump raise serious concerns about whether the U.S. will uphold Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. While this alone is alarming, it also raises a more unsettling question: could Europe find itself in a war against a country backed by the United States, potentially even Russia?

This scenario may seem far-fetched, but it cannot be dismissed outright. After all, just a few years ago, few could have imagined that we would be facing the current geopolitical reality.

This scenario raises a pressing question: To what extent is Europe’s military autonomy constrained by the very weapons and systems it has acquired from the U.S.; a constraint that Ukraine has painfully experienced firsthand.

This article examines the “Kill Switch”: the embedded control mechanisms in U.S. military systems that can limit, disable, or even neutralize the military capabilities of American allies if they step out of line. I analyze which systems are affected, how they function, and what the military and strategic implications are for Europe.

1. The ‘Kill Switch’ in action: How the U.S. has used it before

The idea that the U.S. could remotely limit or disable weapons systems it supplies to its allies is not theoretical: it has already happened. A striking example is the HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) supplied to Ukraine.

The HIMARS system is capable of firing long-range ATACMS missiles, which would allow Ukraine to strike deep into Russian-held territory. However, when these systems were delivered, the U.S. deliberately disabled their full range, limiting Ukraine’s ability to use them offensively against targets beyond a certain distance.

While publicly justified as a way to avoid escalating the conflict, this action demonstrated that the U.S. retains control over how its weapons are used, even after transfer to an ally.

This is not an isolated case. The U.S. has historically imposed software locks, geofencing, and supply-chain dependencies on various weapons systems, ensuring that they remain under Washington’s control.

The question for Europe is: what happens if the U.S. decides to apply similar restrictions – or worse, a full shutdown – on European forces?

2. U.S. Military Systems with Embedded Control Mechanisms

The European military landscape is deeply intertwined with U.S. technology, from fighter jets to missile defense systems and digital infrastructure. Below are some of the most critical systems that could be restricted or disabled in a crisis.

a. Fighter Aircraft and Drones

• : Requires continuous software updates from Lockheed Martin via ALIS/ODIN; without U.S. approval, essential functions could be disabled.F-35 Lightning II
• F-16V Fighting Falcon: Weapons integration and electronic warfare capabilities remain under U.S. oversight.
• MQ-9 Reaper Drone: Operates through U.S.-controlled satellite links, potentially allowing remote deactivation.

.

.