網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
可以亂真的合成影像
2011/11/18 14:51:47瀏覽981|回應1|推薦6
上面這張挖掘古巨人墓的照片是一位加拿大攝影師拼合出來的,光影和透視都很自然,是不可多得的佳作。

下面的巨型水母也很好,潛水人的蛙鞋鞋底的微弱反光可圏可點!真的大水母最多只長到兩公尺多。

更下面那三隻西點軍校訓練出來的狐狸,雖然動作劃一,難能可貴,但卻留下太多破綻,細節重複得不像話 (應該是取影片相連的的幾張拼湊而成),看來就和 Google 弄出來那些軍事設施一樣假。請看本 blog 的另一篇文章:Google 衛星地圖往往捏造虛幻城市

如看不見下面兩個圖,請點擊本文標題 (首頁只顯示最上面的一個圖)。
( 時事評論雜論 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=Mandulover&aid=5851077

 回應文章

柔不茹剛亦不吐
等級:8
留言加入好友
http://blog.udn.com/Mandulover/5851077
2011/12/06 05:54

Dr.  Wang,

       Everything can be fake, including blogers' photos ( to attack others), ya, you can call hi-tach products in centry 21, good side is that we can use it to make the incredible photos, bad side is that we wonder how many image will be true. 

      What do you think ?  Don't you like to reply your reviewer ?

王家聲(Mandulover) 於 2011-12-06 09:17 回覆:
      Yours is a very profound question. Personally, I don't know what to think. This entire planet is formed out of a few spoonfuls of matter. What we see, what we walk on is mostly empty space. We are products of our evolutionary past, not optimally equipped to find out what is really out there.

      To answer your specific question, it is not always possible to tell whether a photograph has been doctored. Re-sampling algorithms can remove most of the traces of alteration.

      If sometimes I appear to be unresponsive, it is because I have too many irons in the fire. I don't mean to be rude or anything.