記得在電影 "Thanks for smoking" 裡有一個(很賴皮的)辯証法

"我不用証明我對" (e.g., "smoking is causing cancer")

"我只要証明你錯就可以了" (e.g., "find some statistics to prove cancer is not ALL caused by ciggerate")

有良心的人絕不會說外遇是對的，沒良心的人舉幾個反例就以為是平衡報導了

這就像小學老師不一定都是聖人 但必須要教道德而不需在教道德時心虛

以學工程科學的人來說，機率統計也只是支持論文或設計的手段

直覺常常才有更正確的啟發。

從我身邊的人們故事哩，我個人是同情外遇三方的任一方的，但一個知識份子，即使他自己有外遇，也有責任有立場 不應該以數字支持外遇的正確性，誤導一般普世的價值錯誤，哪怕數據確實如此，真正受苦的將是那些被誤導的人。

I got that statistics from Google search.
Jacky and Kao are public figures who are subject to everyone's crutiny.
In this regard, I am not to comment on your article.

Given the same circumstance in the public place each react
differently. The same excuses may apply in different way be he or she
a some body or no body. The approach of expression might be varied
by gender but the proportion of infidelity between them are about the same.
That is my point.

我比較好奇的是，

郭董那天記者會上，

除了兩名舉手的記者外，

其他男性記者是誰，

這個應該好好瞭解一下，呵呵

Infidelity Statistics

---

It's tough to get a handle on how many of us are having affairs, given the inherent secrecy.

• Conservative infidelity statistics estimate that “60 percent of men and 40 percent of women will have an extramarital affair. These figures are even more significant when we consider the total number of marriages involved, since it's unlikely that all the men and women having affairs happen to be married to each other. If even half of the women having affairs (or 20 percent) are married to men not included in the 60 percent having affairs, then at least one partner will have an affair in approximately 80 percent of all marriages. .....For instance, the continuing increase of women in the workplace and the increase of women having affairs on the Internet means that the numbers for women having affairs is probably similar to those for men—about 60%.

吳宗憲應該是說：「一個男人為一個家庭犧牲最多的是什麼？是他的愛情。」

不久前在狄鶯主持的節目上看到吳宗憲為自己辯駁，有兩句乍聽有理的話。

「不要愛上男人，要去理解男人。」

「一個男人為家庭付出最多的是什麼？是他的愛情。」

我想這兩句話都是自私男人的寫照，個人主義很重，對或錯各人可能看法不同，但是的確會傷害到另一半，或者另一方得接受名存實亡的婚姻關係。

另外我不覺得這兩句話是吳宗憲自己體悟出來的，只是看過聽過就拿來應急罷了。