網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
Why I don't think Leo can save HP
2011/08/31 19:11:09瀏覽388|回應0|推薦4

Rick Merritt 8/18/2011 7:40 PM EDT

 

SAN JOSECalif. – I understand Leo Apotheker's vision for Hewlett-Packard, but I don't believe he can execute on it. HP's woes are broad and deep, and the new CEO's methods are at best clumsy and arguably incompetent.

 

By announcing HP will take the next year or so to discuss what to do with its PC business, Apotheker will drive customers to Acer, Dell and Lenovo - and drive down the price anyone would pay for HP's $41 billion PC group.

 

It's hard to think of anyone who might want to buy the world's leading PC business given its razor thin margins. What's worse, that client business has zero position in the hot mobile markets of tablets and smartphones now that Apotheker axed HP's WebOS products.

 

It's even harder to think of who would want to buy the remaining WebOS software group, given Apotheker is admitting he sees no viable product business based on it. If WebOS was not already in last place as a mobile platform, it is now.

 

I fail to understand why HP did not opt to explore possible PC and WebOS deals quietly before announcing to the market it believes both are of questionable value. I am no fan of the new HP tablets and smartphones, but axing the WebOS products after two months on the market may set a new record for corporate impatience.

 

In a conference call, Apotheker talks about managing the PC and WebOS businesses "in a very normal way" while HP explores its options. "I am sure we can manage through whatever distractions there are and continue to deliver great products," he said. Bull.

 

HP is victim of too many CEOs. Carly Fiorina bought Compaq to get PC volumes up. Mark Hurd bought Palm for $1.2 billion just 18 months ago to create a mobile client strategy.

 

Now Apotheker, the former SAP CEO, decides client computing is a hot potato, and drives the company to a server software strategy. HP employees should sue for whiplash.

  

Unfortunately HP's woes are not limited to PCs and WebOS. It's services business has failed to live up to the promise of its massive acquisition of EDS, so today Apotheker also appointed a new and largely unknown head of that unit which he says now faces an 18-month transition period.

 

On another front, Oracle, with Mark Hurd now sharing the helm, announced it will stop supporting Itanium with its database software. The move helped drive down sales of HP's Itanium servers by nine percent in the latest quarter.

 

Even printers are facing significant "headwinds" HP reported, in part due to supply chain disruptions after the Japan earthquake.

 

For relief, Apotheker is turning to a little-known, 15-year-old business applications company called Autonomy Corp. which he aims to acquire for a whopping $10.3 billion. Like most of Apotheker's moves, however, details of the deal are not yet fully baked.

 

The CEO positions the deal as helping transform HP into a higher margin server and software business. Sounds like Oracle, only the software piece is far less compelling than core database or SAP software.

 

One analyst was quick to attack the deal as overvalued.

"You are paying close to 11-times the trialing revenue while your stock is at a low," said the analyst on the conference call. Autonomy represents "less than one percent of HP's revenues yet cost 15% of its market cap," he noted.

 

That rustling sound you hear is from disgruntled HP employees printing out their resumes. At this point I don't know what would be worse for HP, suffering through the next two years with Apotheker, or looking for yet another new CEO.

( 時事評論財經 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=pauljc&aid=5599926