這絕對是個警察國家~

唯諷刺的卻有一個自閉症的[宅男]元首~

凡討論其好色成性的馬父..

雖馬父千真萬確死於馬上風~且被赤裸裸送至醫院~

任何教師若敢討論此[事實]..

則立即被以行為不檢.道德淪喪為由剝奪教師權20年!

~所謂..讀聖賢所學何事?~

正如利用台灣納稅人血汗錢當獎學金讀到哈佛大學博士學位之人~

讀聖賢書所學何用??..用於~自我封閉..當個冇懶葩的宅男!

.

孫逸仙博士不斷地教誨他的徒子徒孫..立志做大事.不是做大官!

這位宅男與其色情狂馬父~厚顏無恥地公開承認~馬從小立志~當總統!

當總統這種大官~正是他們這家子..朝思暮想..的志向~

一旦當上總統後~他根本沒有立志為台灣人民謀福利~

志已至此..死而無憾..

因此馬宅男只想要當總統~壓根兒未想要為台灣人民謀福祉~只想到自己屁股位置!

.

yahoo~的卑劣手法只是為迎合這樣獨裁者的屁好~

唉~吃虧的終將是台灣人民~與版主大人..

I think that your title "思想檢察'''藍色恐怖'' is going to far.
Yahoo and Google both have the rules to follow. In another words,
if the contends of my AdWords does not match with web page Google
will advice me to make a correction. Otherwise, they will remove
the AdWords to avoid "Misleading".  That is their job. Particularly
personal attack which might involve the criminal law and they had
to remove to avoid litigation. But critisizing public figure does not
and you are protected by the Constitution. I got my article
"America, an Internet Policing Country?" question the legality of
government office in this issue.