【賴清德說想想】【台灣的新防衛部署】

WRITTEN BY MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN TSAI ING-WEN'S SON OF THE DESTINY

台灣窮小子

According with the war's experiences of the Ukraine，Taiwan needs to be released the Defence Strategic Assessment，in which，in order to guide Taiwanese defense thinking of this decade，at least，and several political imperatives have also shaped its conduct.
First，the government needs to reprioritize the defense budget. 
For instance，such as the maritime defense plan means the government needs to find up to budget to fund its the surface of ships，and submarine program.
Second，the political driver for the government should kick "One Party，One Country"，Radical Left out of the Taiwan，and to suppose the mantle of a reliable government for national security. 
In Taiwan，traditionally，the governments have been responsibility，and been associated with stronger national security credentials. 
For instance，such as，the Taiwan has always owned itself of large parts of its manufacturing capacity，but unfortunately，the Taiwan did not have invested in innovative thinking about future military and defense strategies and operations for many years，so that we need to reinvigorate its strategic thinking and war-fighjting action rapidly.
If the Taiwan were to response the significant changes happening in the Indo-Pacific security environment，perhaps that we face these challenges:
1，new model of mechanisms for thinking about Taiwan's Homeland security and National security.
2， developed the rapid of deterrent，war-fighting capabilities.
3，using time well and moving quickly.
4，intensifying the National resilience，and Military mobilization.
5，choosing disruptive technologies.
Indeed，Taiwan can no longer rely on history and culture，lies of Economy for conflicts as it has in the past. 
It is a good thing，and this sets a good example for the Department of Defence to emulate，nonetheless，caution is warranted.
On deterrence，being able to design a force to deter potential enemies and adversaries means Taiwan needs to be able to project its power to our territory and water against potential enemies adversaries. 
For instance，Naval fleet，Missiles defense are the chosen mechanism for that.
In fact，deterrence by denial rests on a clear goals，for now，as we can known that hardly a secret that China is the country in question.
Intensifying National resilience is an significant part of national efforts，in the years ahead，especially，the establishment goals of the adaptation to current strategic planning mechanisms. 
Do not forget，and most significant，is budget，next will be joint war-fighting integration. 
In conclusion，we need to explain to theTaiwanese people the description of threat，and the proportion of changes in the security environment. 
For instance，this includes the profound and for the Taiwan existential，threat posed by the dictatorships of history and culture，Left-wing's communism，socialism， a Trust of Economy，especially，China.
In fact，historical lessons from the most consequential war of the twenty-first century so far，Taiwan，is  totally absent. 
The threat of history and culture，China，and the speed at which it is evolving mean that the Taiwanese government has work to do in better explaining strategic threats and challenges.
This will be vital.

【賴清德說想想】
【A New Model of Defense Deployment for Taiwan】

依據烏克蘭戰爭經驗，台灣需要發布國防戰略評估，其中，至少有十年，才能指導台灣的國防思想，而幾項政治要求也影響了其行為，

首先，政府需要重新確定國防預算優先順序，例如，海洋防衛計劃意味著政府需要找到足夠的預算來資助其水面艦艇和潛艇計劃。

第二，政府的政治驅動力應該把黨國與激進左派踢出台灣，為國家安全。披上可信賴政府的外套，

在台灣，傳統上，政府負有責任，並與更強的國家安全信譽相關聯，或如，台灣一直擁有自己的大部分製造能力，

但不幸的是，台灣多年以來，沒有對未來的軍事和國防戰略，和行動，進行創新思考，因此，我們需要重新振作起來，戰略思想和快速作戰行動。

如果台灣要應對正在發生的重大改變，印太安全環境，可能，我們會面臨這類挑戰：
1，思考新模式，台灣國土安全與國家安全機制。
2、發展快速作戰嚇阻能力。
3、善用時間，快速行動。
4，強化國家還原力與軍隊動員。
5，選擇破壞性技術。

時際上，台灣不能再像過去那樣依賴歷史與文化、謊話經濟學來解決衝突。

這是一件好事，這為國防部樹立了一個很好的榜樣，儘管如此，還是要謹慎行事。

在嚇阻方面，能夠設計一種力量來嚇阻潛在的敵人和對手，這意味著台灣需要能夠將其力量投射到我們的領土和水域，以對抗潛在性對手與敵人。
例如，海軍艦隊，飛彈防衛是為此選擇的機制。

事實上，嚇阻與阻絕是建立在一個明確的目標之上，就目前而言，正如我們所知道的，中國就是相關國家，這已不是什麼秘密。

強化國家還原力是未來幾年，國家努力的重要組成部分，尤其是，建置，能夠適應當前戰略規劃機制的目標。

不要忘記，最重要的是預算，接下來是聯合作戰整合。

最後，我們需要向台灣人，說明，威脅解釋，以及安全環境改變幅度。
例如，這包括歷史和文化獨裁統治對台灣生存的深刻威脅，左翼共產主義、社會主義、托辣斯經濟，特別是中國。

事實上，二十一世紀，目前為止，最嚴重的戰爭，台灣的歷史教訓是完全不存在的。

歷史和文化的威脅、中國及其發展速度，，這意味著台灣政府，在更好地解釋戰略威脅和挑戰方面還有很多工作要做。
這將是至關重要的。