In Fukushima Dai-ichi, the reactors for Units 1, 2, and 6 were supplied by General Electric, those for Units 3 and 5 by Toshiba, and Unit 4 by Hitachi.  All six reactors were designed by General Electric.

But, do you know the true story?

A General Electric Co engineer said he resigned 35 years ago over concern about the safety of a nuclear reactor design used in the now crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan.

Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing -- the Mark 1 -- was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.

Dale Bridenbaugh said the "Mark 1" design had "not yet been designed to withstand the loads" that could be experienced in a large-scale accident.

"At the time, I didn't think the utilities were taking things seriously enough," Bridenbaugh, now retired, said in a phone interview. "I felt some of the plants should have been shut down while the analysis was completed, and GE and the utilities didn't want to do that, so I left."

看媒體把日本人形容的多守秩序規矩，多認真，多盡忠職守，好像Fukushima Dai-ichi核電廠的災害是天意，是不可抗拒的，

真的是這樣嗎?

有沒有可能一開始設計規劃就作的狗皮倒灶?

經營運轉時偷雞摸狗、對管理規範的要求陽奉陰違?

作假資料讓危害環境、早該停止運轉的危險設施繼續運作?

就像在山坡地濫墾濫伐會加劇土石流，這些核電廠的人謀不臧也是災害如此巨大的原因。