30樓.

2010/03/12 12:51

我也去過

　　　前年也曾經到該園欣賞花卉，感覺不錯，只是假日車多了些。

拍的照片很漂亮．．．．

29樓. ben 邯鄲學步中

2010/03/11 04:27

aesthetic is universal

see the tulip picture in the following new york times article.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/09/breezy-love-or-the-sacking-of-the-bees/?hp

i am not sure if  "librado romero" copied your photo or was inspired by it.

ben

28樓. Luye

2010/03/04 02:15

我太粗心啦！
窮而後功的「功」字，應是應是這個「工」。請將前項回應刪除，謝謝！

27樓. AL

2010/03/03 11:07

bees...
cute little bees

26樓. 凱C

2010/03/02 11:20

真美~~
尤其是近似黑紫色的那些鬱金香, 謝謝筱小姐導覽~~

---

25樓. JamieChao

2010/03/01 23:16

不用機票錢
現在台灣還真是甚麼都有，不用去荷蘭了嘛~看你這拍的跟人家去荷蘭拍的好像沒甚麼不同哩！

24樓. Pamela巧手潘

2010/03/01 20:46

re
好美的鬱金香花海，謝謝分享，我寫了一首新詩，引用了你的文章！

23樓. shu chen--隨緣美食

2010/03/01 20:34

熱昏鬱金香了

昨天去桃源仙谷

鬱金香都枯了

很失望

等明年囉

只是鬱金香花海仍不是很大片耶

很期待荷蘭的視野

22樓. ben 邯鄲學步中

2010/03/01 08:08

no refutation
i see your point.

from 3 different pcs, i checked out the web site you had referred to.
indeed, the photographer showcased a technique of high caliber.
i am a passive onlooker, not an active participant (or practitioner) in photography.
confined by my meager ability, i walk away with an impression of "commercial photography", which is commonly seen in the glossy fashion magazines or flashy picture-rich/ad-laden but content-poor publications.  maybe national geography magazine's style insidiously intoxicates my tastes over the years.

i can not refute that the technique of such caliber is challenging.  it would be a professional milestone for honing your skills to reach that plateau consistently. however, over using it may result in implausible and, at times,  less artistic pictures, imho.

i like your title photo and the one above "逆光的花杯，朵朵剔透，想舉杯盡飲".

btw, these is an article on "the meaning of new photography and the effect of photoshop" in new york times, 2/25/2010.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/personaltech/25pogue-email.html

21樓. 山楓 @ 薪火相傳

2010/02/28 19:42

好美
我這兒還在下雪，要到三月才可以賞到鬱金香。