網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
1949 of June 4th?
2013/06/05 13:58:04瀏覽60|回應0|推薦1

1949 of June 4th?

169856996  負責任的歷史與文化?
中國的1949年,還要再來嗎?
POST BY 台灣窮小子 JUNE 4,2013-2130PM
負責任的歷史與文化,到底是甚麼定義呢?
幾十年以來,歷史與文化,一直隱藏與避免有些事,然而,在此類事件中,隱藏與避免,妨礙了國家,而不是,讓國家作出決策;
台灣窮小子,很早地開始懷疑,如果我們一直追尋隱藏與避免的歷史與文化;
這是誰也發現不了,非常好的,負責任的歷史與文化!
簡單來說1,949年不能終結,與主張國家帶來我們自己的命運.!
1949年總是恐懼天下圍攻!
然而,1949年走向隱藏的理念,其實是能夠避免的;
簡單來說,終結它,不僅將帶來新世代,同時,增加贏得未來的機會;
隱藏的歷史與文化是一個花言巧語的可能性,其龐大的影響,我們需要思考,是否終結,是給它們足夠的學習?
換句話說,歷史與文化是公開的,這是可能起動,日漸壯大的國家實力,而不是.隱藏它!
負責任的歷史與文化,通常是國家語言,特別是,科學與技術,可能在人文;
很不幸地,這類都不存在於,今日的中國!
所以,狹隘的1949年中國的歷史與文化是一個自相矛盾論;
其實,很簡單-不負責任!

HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL OF ACCOUNTABILITY?
CHINA'S 1949 WILL BE  ANEW?
POST BY
台灣窮小子 JUNE 4,2013-2130PM
What on earth this definition for historical and cultural of accpuntability?
Since many decades,history and culture have been to hide and avoid making some of events,however,in these events,the hide and avoidance are that the nation blocked,rather than,making nation where decision-making were made.
台灣窮小子 started early to suspect if we have been looking hidden and avoided of history and culture,those who also cannot find great of historical and cultural of accountability.
Simply put,the 1949 cannot end,and stands that nation brought about our own destiny.
The 1949 has always been afraid of besieged globe.
Yet,the 1949 moved toward hide in the concept,indeed,it could be evitable,simply put,ending of it,that not only,would bring on new era,at the same time,increase opportinities of winning future.
Hide of history and culture is logical possibility,that it has enormous implications,we will need to think whether the end is to give them enough to learn.
In other words,history and culture are open,and they are  likely to start their growing national forde,rather than,hide it.
Historical and cultural of accountability often were the national language.In particular,science and technology,perhaps in the human.
Unfortunately,none of that exists to today's China.
So,narrow-mind of 1949,China's history and culture is a puzzle.In fact,it is simple - none of accountability.

( 時事評論政治 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=maverick2012&aid=7723413