網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
【蔡英文說想想】:【葉門之戰-歷史與文化,誰主報復與清理?】
2015/03/30 09:42:44瀏覽156|回應0|推薦0

YEMEN CRISIS  

【蔡英文說想想】:

【葉門之戰-歷史與文化,

誰主報復與清理?】

【蔡英文說想想】: 【葉門之戰-遜尼與什葉,誰主浮沈?】 

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 29 2015

10422340_10153049662565020_4066048570740647009_n  

 

NOTE:

The U.S. of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey said that

"they call themselves the popular mobilization forces — whether when they recapture lost territory,

whether they engage in acts of retribution and ethnic cleansing.” ;

"He does not need to watch any longer. They are engaging in exactly that."

 

Indeed , Iran is not rather better than the other Islamic State ;

put simply , they are employing in the U.S. air - attacking , to wipe out adversaries.

THE CRIMES OF WAR IS BEING DIRECTED BY HISTORY AND CULTURE

According with the Islamic State's history and culture , they have always been unequivocal in condemning , even directing the crimes of war , including genocide of rape.
Despite that they gained ground superiority , and they are leaving destruction and death , whose are still unfettered and beyond the law.
They have been through specious assumption on the history and culture , which the apparent tactical objective was ethnic cleansing , especially , the Iranian-led striving.In turn , the goal is that change traditionally the demographic framework.
So , Sunnis were not the only to be attacked.Because the U.S. Security Force was also making a mistake - massacre.

HISTORY AND CULTURE IN ISLAMIC STATE WANT TO MAKE AMERICANS FALL INTO A PLOT.

A civil war was inevitable , because some National forces have already been corruption , so as ISIS can be conquered.In parciaular , lacked of direct American's commandment.
In other words , these nefarious history and culture are the United States do the scapegoats.
What does this mean for the scapegoats?
In turn , it will be only a tactical loss ,rather than strategic mistake one.
Put simply , there is no doubt that commanding with the United States they hated.
In the end , recrimination and annoyance are making no senses ; that is what history and culture in the Islamic State.
Whatever the history and culture , the result is the same : even the Iran interferes , if it can even be?

 

【THE BATTLE OF THE YEMEN -

HISTORY AND  CULTURE DOMINATE RETRIBUTION AND CLEANSING?】

註:
美國參謀總長 Martin Dempsey 說:

"他們自稱為全民動員的力量 - 無論是當他們奪回失去的領地,他們是否從事報復和種族淨化" ;

"沒有必要瞥太久的時間它們正在這樣做"!

其實,伊朗不是比其他伊斯蘭國家好;

簡單來說,利用美國的空中攻擊,排除異己!

歷史與文化導演戰爭犯罪行動

端視伊斯蘭國家歷史與文化總是毫不含糊地譴責,甚至,導演戰爭犯罪行動,包括,強姦的種族滅絕;

即使,取得地面優勢,它們留下破壞與死亡,仍然逍遙法外!

它們透過歷史與文化做似是而非的假設,明顯的戰術目標是種族淨化;

特別是,伊朗為首的努力,另言之,目標在改變傳統的人口架構!

所以,遜尼並不是唯一的被攻擊,因為美國安全部隊也犯錯-屠殺!

在伊斯蘭國家的歷史與文化意圖讓美國中計

內戰本是無可避免的,因為有些國家部隊早已經腐敗;

是以,ISIS能夠征服,特別是,缺乏美國的直接指揮!

換句話說,這類窮兇極惡的歷史與文化讓美國做替死狗!

這是什麼意思-替死狗?

另言之,這僅是一個戰術損失,而不是策略錯誤;

簡單來說,無疑是,它們恨美國的指揮,或如,伊朗!

最後,譴責與恨是沒有意義,這就是歷史與文化在伊斯蘭國家;

無論如何,有歷史與文化,結果都是同款:即便是伊朗介入,如果,它可以?

 

( 時事評論政治 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=maverick2012&aid=21864583