【10】【Sino-Taiwan,A legacy of Traditional China CCP Ignores at Its risk】
Sino-Taiwan,A legacy of Traditional China CCP Ignores at Its risk Chinese President Xi Jinping has given a speech,which the message to compatriots in Taiwan - Beijing's plan to integrate Taiwan under the “one country, two systems” framework. According with devised by Deng Xiaoping,“one country, two systems” would allow Taiwan to keep its distinct political and economic systems in exchange for recognizing the existence of only “one China.” But Taiwanese people have already rejected “one country, two systems",since we will not be turning Left-wing's country. Interestingly,eventually,Beijing may believe that Taiwanese people will turn in its side,but perhaps unbeknownst to Left-wing's Chinese,supporting Left-wing's history and culture would only take them so far with Evil. ludicrous is that Beijing may believe that,eventually,Taiwanese people will turn in their option,who is quite pro-China,and is able to defeat President Tsai Ing-wen of the DPP at the Presidental Election of 2020. In my opinion,they should also consider experiences from the Globe,to better understand why “one country, two systems” will never work in Taiwan. For instance,In Hong Kong,protesters young and old continue to fight against the local Beijing-backed authority to push back against perceived central government overreach in the arrangement,and it is a grave questions about the viability of “one country, two systems” going forward. Left-wing's history and culture ran unopposed and are overwhelmingly supported by the CCP's authorities. I believes that complete acquiescence to Beijing will result in vast economic benefits,in spite of unessential compromises to the independence and the freedom. For instance,Left-wing's history and culture has has served as a model under "One Country,Two Systems." The absolute contrast how the independence the freedom has reacted to life under "One Country,Two Systems" is explained by practiced deeper into our special traditional situations. For example,HongKong's compliance is driven in part by the Right-side's trends of the traditions. Indeed,to be sure,Beijing should not send up to domestic immigrants,and for some reason,as frustrating as it has been for native people,so that is what the result in a fundamental upheavals. As expected,no one has translated into a more favorable view of one country,two systems,whereas Taiwanese people have less respect for Left-wing's policy. As known as the “64 Incident”,when mainland New Leftists instigated anti-government riots there as part of the 64. So the unquestioned rule over China mortally wounded on June,4th,1989. Having already lost tradioion and under serious put down a riot against its rebellious Chinese ,CCP decided to suppress military force control of Chinese. According with historical lesson,similar New Left-inspired had always been riots. However,CCP occupation of China,as ruthless as it was,but issues that had transitioned by history and culture. Indeed,the free countries were not exposed to CCP's policies,so was naturally repulsed by Beijing's authoritarianism,such as Taiwan and HongKong。 Because of the Taiwan and the HongKong have had their own traditions. Eventually,the primary areas of focus for China's and Taiwan's traditions are entirely different. In particular,Taiwan,yet,is already fully integrated into the global system and must balance these ties alongside the global prerogatives. Interestingly,however,after years of China's strong economic growth,and Taiwan in the last few years has entered a recession,but Left-wing's Economy has touted stupid history and culture as one concrete way of keeping the economy prosperity. Besides,it would seem that Left-wing's Economy is more dependent than Taiwan on staying within China's good graces to ensure its economic success. Although about most of Taiwanese people is mainland Chinese in origin,but many migrated at the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949,and the birth of subsequent generations in Taiwanese people has undone any sense of Chinese patriotism. In fact,Taiwan's flourishing independent,free,and democratic system has existed since 1986. And is independent and free than China's current or previous system during the waning years of "One Country,One Party" colonial rule. Similarly,,depending on how Taiwanese people counts Taiwan's colonial history,the island either became independent and free from a Chinese KMT dictatorship in 1986,or from Japan following the end of World War II. Either way,Taiwan has been a independent country from the communist Chinese mainland for over 70 years. Something neither Left-wing's history and culture nor CCP can claim. Finally,Taiwan keeps deep ties with the regional and global friendship and partnership. What Beijing should take away is that Left-wing's history and culture shares little,if any,of China's characteristics. Even scarier for Beijing is that Taiwan is almost certain to be a more adversary version,so that powerfully suggesting that the current,in spite of ambiguous,to maintainung status quo of the Traditional Taiwan is the best-case cross-strait status quo is the best-case. Because that may be all Left-wing's history and culture are kept with if China's plans to move forward. Is it really worth attempting to keep Left-wing's history and culture there by force?