Hong Kong’s next leader

Enter the Manchurian candidate

The less unpopular man wins, but governing without a mandate will be hard

Mar 31st 2012 | HONG KONG | from the print edition

IT WAS a contest. That much can be said. Hong Kong’s next chief executive, “C.Y.” Leung Chun-ying, beat his rival, Henry Tang Ying-yen, in the final weeks of a bizarre process that most Hong Kongers refer to as a “small-circle election”. In a city of more than 7m people, fewer than 700 cast votes for Mr Leung on March 25th. But since only 1,193 citizens were eligible, that was enough to win.

The irony is that it turned out to be Hong Kong public opinion, more than anything else, that determined Mr Leung (pictured above, without bow tie) would beat Mr Tang, to replace the outgoing chief executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen (pictured above, with bow tie). In July 2011 Wang Guangya, the head of the central government’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs office, said the next chief executive, should meet three conditions: love of country (read: acceptance of Communist Party rule, meaning the candidate from the Democratic Party didn’t have a chance); competence; and that “the one elected should be widely accepted”. So all eyes have been fixed on the public-opinion polls, especially those run from the University of Hong Kong’s polling unit. If either of the candidates whom the leaders in Beijing judged acceptable were to win those polls by a wide margin, the electors might line up behind him. The point was to stage an event that could be guaranteed to produce a safe outcome while at the same time legitimising the next leader. This could be a dry run for the next election in 2017, when some kind of universal suffrage has been more or less promised.

Making up just 0.017% of the population, this year’s Election Committee forms a small circle indeed. It is an odd mix, divided into blocks representing business and professional interests which are themselves aligned with political factions. The Basic Law of Hong Kong, the territory’s post-handover constitution, makes it easy enough for the government in Beijing to stack the deck in any such contest. This time however, unlike in 1997, 2002 and 2007, the competition was real and even fierce. Muck was raked in the local press, flung back and forth between Messrs Tang and Leung. Some of it stuck.

Mr Tang had been the clear favourite to win for most of the past year, but a series of gaffes over many monthsand admissions about his private life culminated in the revelation in mid-February that he had illegally constructed a lavish basement under a property owned by his wife. The smart money started to shift to Mr Leung. Soon, after discreet signals from Beijing, the pro-Communist Party press stepped into line, giving him more prominent coverage in the days before the vote.

Nonetheless, Mr Leung’s victory is in many ways shocking. Though he is a self-made businessman with longstanding ties to Beijing, he is disliked by the territory’s landed gentry, whose support is supposed to be crucial and who all favoured Mr Tang. They fear Mr Leung is a populist who will pander to the people by forcing property tycoons to release more land under their control, in order to build more flats, and bring down Hong Kong’s stifling property prices. Many ordinary people hope he will do just that. The tycoons' case will be weakened by the surprise arrest on March 29th, for alleged graft, of two major property developers, reported to be Raymond and Thomas Kwok of Sun Hung Kai Properties, as well as a former high government official, reported to be Rafael Hui. Even before this, though, Mr Leung was already toning down his more reformist rhetoric.

Mr Leung cuts a mysterious figure, with an austere personal style that makes him easy to demonise. He is denounced as a “chameleon” by outspoken liberals, his “DNA” as a Hong Konger called into question. The territory’s pro-democratic figures, joined by Mr Leung’s adversaries in the business community, have therefore begun raising an old accusation: that Mr Leung is a closet Communist. He denies it but seems unable to shake the charge, despite many recent public appearances promising to protect Hong Kong’s “core values” of free speech and the rule of law.

For Mr Leung, though, populist does not mean broadly popular. “Least unpopular” might be more like it. The same polling unit that spelled doom for Mr Tang played host to a mock election on March 23rd-24th, in which all of Hong Kong’s adult citizens were invited to vote. Despite the efforts of hackers to bring down the unit’s website, 220,000 people managed to cast ballots in its straw poll—more than four times the number expected. Although Mr Leung did beat Mr Tang, by 18% to 16%, easily the most popular option among Hong Kongers who could be bothered to vote appeared to be a cry of frustration: 55% of the votes cast were blank.

from the print edition | China

Enter the Manchurian candidate

Mar 30th 2012, 16:48

This election’s biggest question is really the direction of local media’s report. Hong Kong’s media often resembles awesomely despicable Taiwan’s when it comes to writing and reporting business. The most apparent point was the talk of Leung Chun-Ying and Henry Tang Ying-Yen’s backbone of Beijing, especially concerned of the number of newspaper’s pages.

For longer time, news about Henry Tang had been posted or pictured more than that of Leung, because Hong Kong’s media always guessed how Beijing thinks the way of controlling Hong Kong and what local big business preferably want. They are full of complacency to show off their accurately light pen and say No.1 in Asia but just produces trash and can for me and in reality.

Well, there is a conspicuous outcome, which indicates that these media are disgustingly ugly. Henry Tang, having the better relation with local business, isn’t elected the successor. The No.1 sayings seems to be the truth when it comes to the entertainment talks like whether Zhang Bo-zhi and Hsieh Ting-Fung will match once again or whether there is the next actress or female singers sleeping with tycoon, who looks like the 14th world-richest billionaire 83-year-old Li Kai-Hsing, or Beijing’s core officers (of course not me), who becomes the next Peng Li-yuan (Xi Jing-ping’s wife).

Let’s retrospect Feb. 27’s news from Bloomberg’s Kelvin Wong and Hwee Ann Tan:

“Leung and Ho said the city should adopt guidelines by the World Health Organization on pollution standards, which Tang objected to. Leung, Tang and Ho advocated using some of the city’s fiscal reserves to provide more social services and investments and narrow its wealth gap. Ip said Hong Kong should set up a sovereign wealth fund.”

“Tang is backed by Li Ka-shing, the chairman of Cheung Kong Holdings Ltd., Thomas Kwok, co-chairman of Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. and Lee Shau Kee, chairman of Henderson Land Development Co. Among Leung’s supporters is Hang Lung Properties Ltd. Chairman Ronnie Chan.” That is to say, three “big” compete struggling “one”.

In truth, these three candidates, hard to comparable to 2007’s two sirs Donald Tsang Yam-kuen and Alan Leong Kah-kit, cannot put forward the persuasive contention which make this metropolitan progressive. Basically, observing Hong Kong’s politics, mainly dividing into two part of pro-communist or freely-democratic side, is anyway under the system of special administration. Some says Xi or China’s incumbent president Hu Jing-tao meddle with this election, but that’s just a rumor. The scandal may be expanding as Thomas and Raymond Kwok as well as Rafael Hui are arrested for corruption by Independent Commision Against Corruption (ICAC). The action marks the highest-level investigation in 38-year ICAC history. Therefore, the newly-elected Leung should seriously play a role in examining the relation of business with government.

And it is dangerous to judge the winner by tycoon’s flavour. If adding to Beijing’s factor, the candidate near China’s Communist Youth League (CCYL) is inclined to win this election for better exercising politics and connection with Beijing. This election is hard to predict not only because of too much scandal but Xi’s faction far away from CCYL. This time, Hong Kong “chooses” the local-inclined one, which may help lead this metropolitan’s resident to the clear notion of both “the same as” and “the different from” Beijing for the prosperous extension of NY-LONG-KONG (New York - London - Hong Kong).

So when the 2017’s election happens, don't believe that terrible Hong Kong’s trash or can, especially because this 2017’s is scheduled to be the first wholy-democratic. Besides, people in Hong Kong might raise the awareness of corporation instead of microphone or camera in order to make clear of the right way of promotion to politics. By the way, I don’t think that Democratic Party is impossible to get the ruling power in Hong Kong because this party accepts the system. Sometimes, for me, this party gaining power takes advantage of central Beijing’s government, like Alan Leong.

    Recommended

    20

    Report

    Permalink

回顧起這六年多前的文章，經濟學人雜誌也算有預測到香港在之後五年的政治窘境及社會上的裂痕隱憂。那一次2012的香港特首選舉是迷你版的，或說是北京代理人之爭：偏習近平的唐英年得到超過八成市佔率的三大財團支持，對上親胡錦濤而草根民主稍有的梁振英為恆隆行及其他本地企業團的支持。梁振英當選後，七月一日的就職演說曾以綠色及廉節的政府自居，並且加強與內地「開放」作「緊密聯結」的態度令人印象深刻。這梁振英當上了第四任香港特別行政區行政長官及全國人民政協副主席。

梁沒有連任，最後留下689的綽號結束在香港政壇生涯。689指的是在2012年選舉委員會梁的得票數。一開始是否為地下黨員及對1989年六四學生運動的立場成為唐在辯論會時的質疑焦點，想兩方都討好立場不定。任內初期曾有一段小愉快，也很愛鄉愛土，住房和貧窮線設計有阻止了數年社會問題蔓延，並作一番行政上整頓，但是2013年10月後的政制改革風暴四起，「袋住先」的措施讓泛民主派質疑這選舉更會造成二等公民的困境，使政治不平等加大。此機制的公憤引起雨傘革命及羅冠聰與黃之峰為首的本土政團的興起，和傳統泛民主派及建制派而後在2017年確立為三股主要政治勢力顯見於區議會及立法會。

筆者之後有加重評論香港的篇幅，2014年雨傘運動及佔中行動後的香港，此後的三年間直到林鄭月娥的上台，在社會情勢及流動上起了比較顯著的變化，中國大陸的政法系統及企業對於香港政治和社會控制日漸增加，使香港在越來越多的總體經濟指標是履創全球排名新高，但特區政府比預期中快速地趨於虛級化及地方化地親近北京中央，而使偏沒有心理準備的港民對於前途變的茫然。香港本地居民不一定享受得到在香港與內地的快速聯結形成後的預期，原本地資方的撤退和內地的管理幹部的移入均排擠原來本地的一般，甚至近來高學歷的本地民眾。今天雖不至於到太大的移民浪潮或再次暴力上街的局面，但是過數年後政制的改革不得不為香港總體官民所要面對的問題，同時要面對社會貧富不均擴大，於是上述所形成的社會指標的隱憂也是阻礙香港本地社會的進步。

筆者在這幾個月後大概固定住這些格式和段落寫作原則。這個時候筆者還是在稍口語化的鬆散寫作，不過在引用報導的同時也要加註自己的意見，而且段落上要注意語意的因果或對立問題。當時在字彙不足的情形下，要有作到效果即表達精確真的有些難度。