台灣自二戰後結束了日本在台灣五十年的殖民統治
卻也留下了台日後裔與文化　社會　政治　習性的深遠影響
國民政府遷台至今六十二年　相對無論是日據或是日治年代
時間多了十二年
對日本殖民政府與國民政府遷台後的台灣影響與未來的影響
成為了海峽兩岸甚至太平洋兩岸無盡爭議的政治焦點

透過比較歷史研究　誠實面對　純粹的治理貢獻與影響分析
讓這國家和國民有更清晰迎向未來的努力　面對無法改變的
地理上區域與國際政治爭奪焦點的困境和機會
可能是最有建設性與眼光的根本作法

是不是呢

附註參考

Comparative historical research is a method of social science that examines historical events in order to create explanations that are valid beyond a particular time and place, either by direct comparison to other historical events, theory building, or reference to the present day.[1] Generally, it involves comparisons of social processes across times and places. It overlaps with historical sociology. While the disciplines of history and sociology have always been connected, they have connected in different ways at different times (see 'Major researchers' below). This form of research may use any of several theoretical orientations. It is distinguished by the types of questions it asks, not the theoretical framework it employs