陸軍儀隊士官屈肇康因為在部落格中寫下「想拿槍往陳水扁腦門插下去」的字眼，而被關進大牢，直到軍事檢察官作出不起訴處分之後，才獲得釋放陸軍儀隊士官屈肇康因為在部落格中寫下「想拿槍往陳水扁腦門插下去」的字眼，而被關進大牢，直到軍事檢察官作出不起訴處分之後，才獲得釋放
2006.07.10 中國時報
陳總統，饒了小兵吧！
傅耀祖/台中大里（前軍法教官）
士兵屈肇康，在網路上發表「很想用槍往陳水扁腦門插下去」等言論，軍方以陸海空軍刑法第十六條「煽惑軍人暴動罪」羈押法辦。筆者以從事軍法教育及實務經驗，提出看法。
刑法分則首章「內亂罪」第一百條已廢，屈員以刑法的特別法「陸海空軍刑法」分則首章「叛亂罪」第十六條「煽惑軍人暴動罪」羈押，顯有不當，值得商榷。首先，屈員在網路部落格上的言論，並非對特定大眾公開散佈，何來煽惑暴動之有？其次，當年黨外人士為思想言論自由，要求廢止第一百條。如今執政何以因屈員不滿之言論而面臨軍法審判？其實，屈員「很想用槍…」，「很想」乃預備犯意，今已無「法」可依；標榜人權治國的陳總統，若以寬宏氣度原諒小兵，也會贏得社會讚美。
筆者於軍法教官任內，認為刑法一百條及軍刑法十六條不妥，並建議軍、師級不宜設軍法組，為此被誣為「思想偏激」、「孫案有關」，冤獄坐過牢。但願陳總統饒了士兵屈肇康，別讓悲劇重演！
Are we in a Status of Martial law period? Back to the future of Chiang's rule?
Yahoo said it already." It is within the scope of Freedom of Speech after reading the whole
contents of that soldier (by the way, Yahoo is one of the top internet companies. Without full consutant with their legal advisor they would not issue such a clear statement.) Go ahead. Put all those people who said similar thing in the blogging of UDN and CT. into the jail. Is this what heppen in a so-called Demorcratic Country Taiwan?
Senators and Representatives of the United States, where are you guys? Are you just a bounch
of hypocrites when you were holding the hearing of Yahoo Google and Cisco about their
roles in China? Now come out of your prejudicial shell and say something.
Attention! Reader of this article, if you keep silent in this matter you would be next target of this administration in Taiwan. At that time we are all better off without internet on line blogging. I don't blame you for your chicken-heart
silence. The least you can do is raising your unhappy voice against this Chen's incecent act.
2006-07-09 03:15 by
Here is legal guidance of bloggers:
"The difference between you and the reporter at your local newspaper is that in many cases, you may not have the benefit of training or resources to help you determine whether what you're doing is legal. And on top of that, sometimes knowing the law doesn't help - in many cases it was written for traditional journalists, and the courts haven't yet decided how it applies to bloggers.
But here's the important part: None of this should stop you from blogging. Freedom of speech is the foundation of a functioning democracy, and Internet bullies shouldn't use the law to stifle legitimate free expression. That's why EFF created this guide, compiling a number of FAQs designed to help you understand your rights and, if necessary, defend your freedom.
notice the sentence of the followings:
"the courts haven't yet decided how it applies to bloggers"
the international law have not set precedent case and when it applies
it goes to "Motive".
Therefore, when you say something better you understand
the law.
2006-07-09 01:47 by
To: CCT
Your view is going too far. Based on your theory, we had better
ask the government to cencor all the blog like China.
Like one of the bloggings here said about killing Chen, do you
seriously considered he really meant it?
I ,IMHO, just think that he was in an angry mood to support
that soldier who, in fact, does not mean to really kill.
that is why Yhoo after studying the whole contents considered
no harm will be done and was with scope of Freedom of
speech. If Chen is so scared about his life you better suggest
him to set up a Special Task Force to do the Blogging Patrol.
this will in fact become a real cencor in Taiwan.
網上發言刺扁 屈姓士兵軍法審判
中央社台北七日電
陸軍儀隊士兵屈肇康因日前在個人網站發表刺扁言論，引發各界關注。國防部軍事發言人吳季方說，屈肇康已被羈押並送軍法審判。負責偵辦的軍檢是以陸海空軍刑法第十六條意圖煽惑現役軍人暴動罪為依據，最重可處七年以上有期徒刑。 ＠ http://udn.com
不過對媒體報導，屈肇康遭軍法移送，可能是因為七月三日總統府軍事會談後「指示」的說法，吳季方則予以嚴正否認。他說，七月三號總統府軍談中，陳總統與國防部長李傑，或是陸軍，根本沒提到相關案件處理情形，也沒提到軍法移送；請外界不要妄加揣測。
吳季方也說，六月三十號，媒體報導屈肇康的失當言行後，軍方先將他由儀隊轉調勤務單位，並函請軍檢單位調查有無違法；他說，由於屈姓士兵有軍人身分，因此在程序上當然要先由軍法單位偵辦。
他指出，北部軍事法院檢察署經調查後認為，屈肇康有違反行政中立與軍隊國家化之嫌，雖然是休假時在個人交友網頁發表發洩性字眼，還是決定羈押，罪名是陸海空軍刑法第十六條，意圖犯本法第十四條第一項之罪，而以文字、圖畫、演說或他法煽惑現役軍人暴動者，處七年以上有期徒刑為依據。
吳季方也表示，屈肇康身為現役軍人，儀隊更是國家的門面，卻在網路上發表此類不當言論，行為相當不合適，因此如果不明快處理，會造成不良影響。至於軍檢單位偵辦後如何處理，或是無相關明確事證而將案件再移送司法偵辦，則要看偵辦的狀況而定。
他說，軍方對發生類似爭議事件深感痛心，也覺得在軍紀、治安與法治教育上，應該繼續精進，所以會將相關個案作為教材，希望官兵不要誤蹈法網。
【2006/07/07 中央社】
字體：
