引用來源如下:http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/501010712/112012031200420.html#
堅持20餘年的戰鬥… 淚訴餘日無多 追求公義無所懼.............我呸!
2012-03-12 00:52 中國時報 【沈婉玉／採訪側記】
為追求賦稅公平與正義，監察院長王建煊建議對大額、非自用住宅交易「按實價課徵土增稅」。

圖為台北信義區房地產。（本報資料照片/鄧博仁攝）  翻攝來自網絡

這篇文誌真是太有意思;

常言道:以經濟歧視和老掉牙歷史等,企圖挑動歷史傷口,然而這就是一例?

打開中華民國建國史,其惺惺作態最甚就是「凡言剩下的人」,無庸置疑!

特別是「凡言剩下的人」所言,還真好意思大聲疾呼:台灣社會不公不義?

話說真那麼「不公不義？」那大概就不會有一面黃色旗幟滿地飛?

尤其是「黑金」一詞?再黑,黑得過日本?

當布衣小子的眼睛給「屎」楜到?真的還不僅只日本;

但這不是戰術重點;

布衣小子說:「凡言剩下的人」從來沒有未來戰略思考能力?

唬得過當前台灣年輕世代,絕不可能唬得過布衣小子?因為布衣小子太了解,黃色旗幟下的「人類」更遑論「凡言剩下的人」?

簡單來說:我呸!此一詞乃布衣小子幾十年的全球專利,因為真的呸了幾十年,有文誌有真相;

聽說:有個知名醫師也引述布衣小子的口頭語,沒關係,歡迎相糾鬥陣來呸?呸死烏龜王八蛋!

事實是:這面黃色旗幟論國家統一,真的是肖話,換句話說:二鬼子!

分隔線

不可否認,台灣有必要進行稅制改革,這是重大國家戰略工程;

但非馬總統兩任能竟全功?

特別是,「實價報稅」一詞,可以說是天方夜譚;

大抵,也跟2008年全球金融危機下的連動債,闖下的麻煩,有異曲同工之處;

如果,真要玩這套戰術?除非,台灣版的普丁出現?可能嗎?大概又是一頁老頭變兔子?

放眼全球,房價高昂,這是不爭的事實,但也能在「不加稅」下來平衡:

不加稅下社會住宅政策?copyrighted by 台灣窮小子
感想概論:
所謂社會住宅的政策擬定,最早緣歸李前總統所倡:六百萬平價國民住宅;而且也不增稅來因應?
但是,年代久遠,可能需要李前總統的說明;
所以,端視蔡英文主席的政策訴求,應該也能夠:在不增稅下,重新審視社會住宅政策?
雖然,仍必須參考當時的台灣長期的經濟環境,特別是,當前的經濟環境;
畢竟,社會住宅在長期的國家財政考量是很難維持;
格外是,必須考量國家財政和稅收選項;
因為在不同選項之間,要取得平衡,以便保持國家財政持續性和促進國家經濟成長;
如果,中央政府儘是努力刺激經濟活動,可能導致國家預算赤字上升;
其特點將可能顯示是高失業率和降低經濟成長;
如果不是,讓社會住宅政策如願,可能有所改善國家財政狀況,不過,也可能破壞國家經濟成長;
在另個層面,所有的福利政策不會降低國家經濟成長,但可能會影響長期的國家
財政前景和成長,特別是,處理長期性的國家財政狀況;
換句話說,如何分配?
或如,回顧以前,李前總統的六百萬國民住宅政策,不可否認其架構在民眾-銀行,建築商系統-政府,可以想像,它是公平的;
當然耳,社會住宅政策提出和必須納入民眾所得稅稅率;
特別是,高收入納稅人和中產階級納稅人長期資本稅收,此外,增加婚姻稅率;
社會住宅政策提出,還是以不破壞國家經濟成長和國家財政考量來降低國家預算赤字,如此一來,社會住宅政策方能持續,特別是,高收入納稅人;
總之,在不加稅下,社會住宅政策傾向於其架構在民眾-銀行,建築商系統-政府,
但在永續經營上,國會稅制改革才是因應決策.

Under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing?
Reflective Summary:
So-called the the made a strategic decision of social housing were enacted early in the Ex.President.Lee who advocated:" 6 million NT dollars public housing",in addition,it was also not increase taxes to response.But,it has been for long time,and it may need Ex.President.Lee of explaination;so,in according with Chairwoman 蔡英文 of policy demand,in which,can under the does not increase taxes that reviewing the policy of social housing?
Thus,it is still need to examines of the Taiwan of the long-term economic enviroment at that time,in particular,current economic enviroment.After all,in long-term,the social housing is unsustainable in national fiscal consideration.Expecially,it must consider with national finance and tax revenue options,because it takes balance between different options to keep national finance sustainability and advancing national economy growth.
If so,central government will only effort to stimulate the economic activity,that may bring about national budget deficit increased,and its point will probably show that high unemployment and reduce economic growth.
If not,to allowing the policy of social housing to execute as wish will somewhat improve national finance condition,but,it also may destroy national economic growth.
At another levels,enduringly all of welfare policies would not reduce national economy growth,but,in long-term,it may influence national finance outlook and growth,in particular,in dealing with the long-term of national finance conditions.In other words,how to distribute?
As look back to Ex,president.Lee of 6 million policy of social housing,and it cannot denied that its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that it is equitable.
Of course,policy of social housing has proposed ,and must bring into people's individual income tax rates,in particular,high income taxpayers and middle class taxpayers of tax rates on long-term capital gains,in addition,increase marriage rates.
The policy of social housing has proposed,in which,still cannot destroy national economic growth and finance consideration,in a while,allowing increase tax to reduce national budget deficit,and than,the policy of social housing will be sustainability.In particular,high income taxpayers.
In short,under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing which depends on its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that it is equitable.
But,on the management sustainability,and Congress to consider tax reform is responsible for decision-making.

分隔線

「凡言剩下的人」不僅從來沒有未來戰略思考能力?也還不如一個女人引發戰略思考?