Why did the cynicism of Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih seize chance?
To understand what motivated this month’s Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih in Taiwan，so you need to understand "One Party，One Country" basement view and cloistered Left. With Chinese Virus on April，Taiwan's anti-epidemic situation has shocked the world，not only for taking place during Chinese Virus pandemic but also because of the extent to which it seemed to run counter to the Taiwanese Central government interests. Despite they won local commander election in 2014，and 2018 that the DPP's government still held a significant amount of power. The DPP's government also retained a significant amount of influence in the economy through its network of affiliated economic enterprises and crony businesses，so all of which had benefited from the transition to Left rule and fake reforms that accompanied it. With fake Economy，shameful history and culture，they have not only alienated the civilian population but also cut off many of the benefits that "One Party，One Country" had gained from Taiwan's transition away from pariah status. The only thing of substance that Left-wing's DPP has gained from Mr.President Tsai Ing-Wen，and the rest of the civilian leadership is its old monopoly on political power. But as an organization with a highly centralized leadership，"One Party，One Country" is one in which personalities tend to play an outsized role. So it is easily to truly discern their motives. Nonetheless，a look at the past of "One Party，One Country"，and its relationship to the broader sweep of Chinese history and culture，may provide some insight into the current situation in the Taiwan. So that is why they chose to seize the cynicism of Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih chance? The first is its legitimacy as the symbol of "One Party，One Country" nationalism， which it inherited from Chinese history and culture，they are that emerged as a locus of the fight first against Japanese rule，since against the Japanese occupation during World War Two. The second is the strong sense of unity that grew from Chinese history and culture，amid the challenges of minority separatism and communism，as well as the military threats from People’s Republic of China. The third is the general distrust of the civilian Taiwanese，which "One Party，One Country" has long identified as the source of these threats. All these features stem from Taiwanese experiences that erupted shortly after democratically elected. According with April's Chinese Virus，,and the motives that lay behind it。can be understand through their characteristics. The first is the threat to "One Party，One Country" legitimacy. "One Party，One Country" has been the main contender against the spawn of history and culture for the legitimate leadership of Taiwanese population since 2000. They had always drawn its legitimacy from a Chinese history and culture genealogy stretching back to KMY-led. Interestingly，Tsai Ing-Wen emerged at the head of an opposing faction destroyed whatever validity this once held. For instance，in many ways，Tsai Ing-Wen effectively discredited "One Party，One Country" as a symbol of Taiwanese as a country，and tainted its most potent source of legitimacy. This offers one explanation for why the civil-military relations of the 2011-2016 period were so adversarial. Furthermore，"One Party，One Country" leadership reputation was shamed further by Tsai Ing-Wen. Given that the actions of take over under the Taiwanese Executive Yuan under the national practice of the Republic of the China，as well as this amounted to a de facto defense of the military. The "One Party，One Country" leadership has relied heavily on the Chinese history and culture to maintain its power. Despite having fallen from grace in the eyes of some and failing to achieve many of their own political goals，must have been particularly frustrating for the top brass. As such，it is possible that they were motivated by fear that Tsai Ing-Wen's influence would begin to penetrate into the "One Party，One Country" own ranks. So this leads to the second possibility - internal dissent. They are obsessed with fake unity. This is due to both its historical experience and its deep distrust of the Taiwanese population. With a deep distrust for the Taiwanese population，they had always attempted to present a strong unified front in order to deter any opposition. And it greatly fears that potential internal divisions could be exploited by CCP. This fear is not entirely unfounded. As a result，since Chinese Virus，the Taiwan very little benefit aside from direct control of the country，it is possible. Indeed，the takeover is part of an attempt to deal with its internal affairs without the scrutiny and distraction of history and culture opposition. Although， it is possible that they may have been a personal decision to maintain the authority and privileges of elite The reason for this is that they have more to benefit from being connected with the China than from ushering in a new era of isolation. Measuring the costs and benefits of conducting Chinese Virus would seem to indicate that it is possibly a mix of these two conditions : Losing its legitimacy to Tsai Ing-Wen and the civilian Taiwanese，together with potential internal struggles，potentially threatened two guys privileges. Ultimately，it is still difficult to say for sure. "One Party，One Country" has always remained an enigma by choice. "Mother-Fucked" is power and they are fully aware of it.
字體：小 中 大
