Russian's Report: Comet ISON Acts Like Intelligently Controlled Alien Spacecraft

Posted by rev.joshua skirvin on December 3, 2013 at 8:24amView Blog

 Russian's Report: Comet ISON Acts Like Intelligently Controlled Alien Spacecraft

蘇俄報導:

慧星ISON的行動

像是一個被高級智能控制住的外星太空船

A new report prepared by the Federal Space Agency (ROSCOSMOS) circulating in the Kremlin today states that Comet C/2012 S1 has made a number of “unexplained orbital adjustments” around the planet Mars seemingly to better align itself with the Red planets strange moon Phobos.

蘇俄聯邦太空中心the Federal Space Agency (ROSCOSMOS)今天在克里姆林宮流傳一份新的報告 ~~指稱Comet C/2012 S1(慧星ISON)一直以來做了幾個 “無法解釋的軌道調整”~~在火星附近 ~~顯然是要把它自己更好的與the Red planets(紅色星球們?)中的奇怪月亮Phobos. 對齊

According to this report, Comet C/2012 S1 was first discovered on 21 September 2012 by Russian amateur astronomers Vitali Nevski and Artyom Novichonok using the International Scientific Optical Network, thus giving this comet its name ISON. Phobos is the larger and closer of the two natural satellites of Mars and with a mean radius of 11.1 km (6.9 mi) it is 7.24 times more massive than the second moon Deimos.

慧星ISON是被蘇俄人在2012年9月21日所發現取名.

Important to note about Phobos, this report continues, was in 1958 when Russian astrophysicist Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky, studying the secular acceleration of Phobos’s orbital motion, suggested a “thin sheet metal” structure for Phobos, a suggestion which led to speculations that Phobos was of artificial origin.

1958年蘇俄研判Phobos應該是 ‘人造’ 行星.

Shklovsky based his analysis on estimates of the upper Martian atmosphere’s density, and deduced that for the weak braking effect to be able to account for the secular acceleration, Phobos had to be very light — onecalculation yielded a hollow iron sphere 16 kilometers (9.9 mi) across but less than 6 cm thick.

In a February 1960 letter to the journal Astronautics, Fred Singer, then science advisor to U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, said of Shklovsky’s theory:

“If the satellite is indeed spiraling inward as deduced from astronomical observation, then there is little alternative to the hypothesis that it is hollow and therefore Martian made. The big ‘if’ lies in the astronomical observations; they may well be in error. Since they are based on several independent sets of measurements taken decades apart by different observers with different instruments, systematic errors may have influenced them.”

Subsequently, the systemic data errors that Singer predicted were said found to exist, and the Shklovsky’s study was called into doubt, and accurate measurements of the orbit available by 1969 said showed that the discrepancy did not exist. Singer’s critique was said justified when earlier studies were discovered to have used an overestimated value of 5 cm/yr for the rate of altitude loss, which was later revised to 1.8 cm/yr. The secular acceleration is now attributed to tidal effects, which had not been considered in the earlier studies.

Soviet scientists, however, this report says, were not convinced by the American scientist’s arguments and in 1988 launched two probes, Phobos 1 and Phobos 2, towards Mars to gather more information.

蘇俄科學家不相信美國科學家的反駁, 在1988年發射了兩艘探索太空船去火星收集資料: Phobos 1 and Phobos 2.

Phobos 1 was “lost” while Phobos 2 was able to establish an orbit around the Mars moon Phobos when it was “attacked” by a still unexplained space craft that showed itself in the last image beamed back to Earth before it was destroyed.

Phobos 1消失了, 而Phobos 2在火星外設定航道之後, 被一艘無法解釋的太空船攻擊 --- 而且此事有影像傳回地球 --- 在Phobos 2被毀掉之前.

Shklovsky’s studies, however, were vindicated in 2012 when the European Space Agency (ESA) released their report on Phobos that, in part, stated:

2012年歐洲太空中心報告證實蘇俄看法.

“One reason to suspect that Phobos is not a captured asteroid is its density. Analysis of Mars Express radioscience data gave new information about the mass of Phobos based on the gravitational attraction it exerts on the spacecraft. The team concluded that Phobos is likely to contain large voids, which makes it less likely to be a captured asteroid. Its composition and structural strength seem to be inconsistent with the capture scenario.”

As some experts have noted that Phobos may be an “ancient spacecraft” marooned in Mars orbit, this report continues, the possibility that Comet ISON may be one too cannot be ruled out either.

所以Phobos可能是艘遠古外星太空船, 而慧星ISON應該也是.

The reason for this assessment, ROSCOSMOS experts state, are the “unexplained orbital adjustments” Comet ISON has apparently made on its approach to Mars and were verified by American amateur astronomer Bruce Gary on 12 August when he became the first to see Comet ISON again after its sojourn behind the sun during June, July and part of August.

Alan MacRobert at Skyandtelescope.com said about Gray’s 12 August discovery: “Comet ISON is about two magnitudes (six times) fainter than it should be compared to the calculations that first led astronomers to predict it would become a grand naked-eye sight before dawn in early December.”

Astronomer Ignacio Ferrin, with the University of Antioquia in Colombia, in a paper submitted to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society further noted that: “Comet ISON has been on a standstill for more than 132 days … a rather puzzling feat.”

哥倫比亞太空人報告: “慧星ISON已經停止不動132天了 …非常不可思議.”

Many in the Western media have billed Comet ISON as “the comet of the century,” this is because it is a sungrazer and its believed to be gaseous tail will expand to millions of kilometers making it appear as bright as the full moon to the naked eye in the coming months.

On 1 October it will pass within 0.07 AU from Mars, about six times closer than it will ever come to Earth and on 28 November, when it is closest to the sun, it will fly through the sun’s atmosphere just a little more than 1.1 million kilometers (720,000 miles) from the solar surface, after which it will be making its inner solar system passage safely 0.426 A.U., or a little over 63 million kilometers from Earth even on its closest approach on 26 December.

This ROSCOSMOS report summarizes its findings by stating that it “cannot be ruled out of theory” that Comet ISON is not a “dirty ice-ball” comet at all, but may, in fact, be an interstellar object under intelligent control on a mission to Phobos for as an yet unexplained mission.

ROSCOSMOS報告結論 --- 慧星ISON應該不是慧星而是一個星際物件 ~~透過智能的操控, 而且負有特殊任務.

And in, perhaps, its strangest assessment, ROSCOSMOS scientists further link Comet ISON to the 9 December 2009 “Norway Spiral” [see video HERE] noting that this still unexplained phenomena was “directly aligned” with the Sign of Cancer from which this strange comet originated from.

中文翻译: 林琚月20131204

http://blog.sina.com.cn/rebeccahjlin

http://vera2013rl.pixnet.net/blog

Read more: http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/profiles/blogs/russian-s-report-comet-ison-acts-like-intelligently-controlled#ixzz2mQf9eu3o

Follow us: AshtarCommandCrew on Facebook