網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
Leap into the Liminal Void: A Fetishistic Reading in Meatless Days
2008/03/08 11:09:31瀏覽1019|回應0|推薦2

Leap into the Liminal Void

A Fetishistic Reading in Meatless Days

 

It has been acknowledged as a common psychoanalytic understanding that women rarely fetishize, the view that has been widely accepted since 1927 when Sigmund Freud suggested that the fetish develops out of a bread form of castration anxiety the time that young boy first realizes that his mother does not have a penis. For women have not penis so they seldom have the fetishistic inclination. Indeed, Freud does vaguely in describing the female fetishism and attributes this behavior as man’s category. To provide the alternative reading of Freudian phallicizing of fetishism, Lorraine Gamman and M. Makinen, in their book Female Fetishism,[1] explain why a woman who has not a penis but still qualifies herself as a fetishist. Their theory focuses on the pre-oedipal instead of the oedipal and challenges the concept of penis envy and the phallus as the only signifier of desire.

The postcolonial critic Homi K. Bhabha has borrowed from Freud’s fetishism to endow with the meaning of mimicry in postcolonial contemplation which turns the exterior sameness into the interior otherness. Yet more important, the way that Bhabha’s employment of mimicry is actually to expound his meditation for the possibility of the third space, the hybridity, the liminality. The notion of cultural change and transmission, the liminal, could be traced back to the anthropologist Victor W. Turner who was recognized as one of the most important cultural theorists from mid-1970 to 1983, the year he died. Following the Belgian folklorist Arnold van Gennep, Turner calls these transitional third spaces the “liminal,” and describes “the liminal” as “the seedbed of cultural creativity [from which] new symbols and constructions then feed back.” Following Turner, Bhabha explores the idea of liminality from the anthropological filed to the post-colonial society. Both Turner and Bhabha are trying to formulate a position for cultural criticism by expounding the concept of liminality in rites of passage, a state of being in in-between phases. Turner suggests formulating a rite of passage for the individual and societal in a liminal phase: “Liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arranged by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial” (95).[2] While Turner extends the liminal concept from the individual to the modern society, Bhabha, on the other hand, elucidates the place of the liminal into a broader national and political implication: “a place of hybridity, figuratively speaking, where the construction of a political object that is new, neither the one nor the other. . . ” (Location 25).[3] For Bhabha, the model of liminality that dramatizes the interstitial space between theory and practice—a liminal space that does not separate but rather mediate their mutual exchange and relative meanings. There is a tension between them that in turn produces their hybridity, the “third space,” the liminal, as an ambivalent, hybrid space that is written into existence.

In this study, Bhabha’s hybridity, the double discursivity and the “third space” as a space of translation, “invention and intervention,” which I find is particularly suited to my project to examine the liminal space of postcolonial cultural identities in terms of the female fetishism that is presented in the Pakistani writer Sara Suleri’s Meatless Days. I consider the analysis of the fetishistic food is decisive for its widespread association with the woman bodies. Furthermore, I shall relate fetishism as linked to a love of clothes and photographs and hence to the object-choice of feet, which prevails in Suleri’s novel. In this autobiographical narrative, apart from the narrator, I focus on the three major characters, Suleri’s mother Mairi, sister Ifat, friend Mustakori, and how their unique fetishistic liminality described by the narrator. Suleri creates the liminal space for the narration of the absent community of women in Pakistan by collaborating the audacious cannibalistic images and female fetishes as a way fighting back the patriarchal society.

Source:

“In the Shadows of Empires”:

The 2nd International Conference on Asian American and Asian British Literatures

 

Date: November 28-29, 2008

Location: Taipei, Taiwan

Organizer: Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica

 

 

Please send your paper abstract (not exceeding 300 words) and brief CV (one paragraph identifying your name, institutional affiliation, areas of interests, and contact info, and a list of your representative publications) to Andy Wang (wchimin@sinica.edu.tw) or tigh@gate.sinica.edu.tw by April 30, 2008.  Decisions on acceptance will be announced by May 31, 2008.



[1] L.Gamman, and M. Makinen, Female Fetishism: A New Look (London: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd., 1994).

[2] Victor W. Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure And Anti-structure (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co, 1969).

[3] Homi K Bhabha, The Location of Culture (New York: Rutledge, 1994). All references to this book are to this edition and are cited parenthetically in the text as Location.

( 創作另類創作 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=Dalloway68&aid=1676456