 
字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2017/01/22 13:21:20瀏覽3｜回應0｜推薦0 | |
 2015年02月01日 17:59 記者游雁双／綜合報導 藝人林采緹先前因Cosp苗栗燒烤推薦lay《航海王》女帝「蛇姬」一角而爆紅，之後順利轉往娛樂圈發展，人氣不斷攀升。而她新專輯《BeCos》的首支MV，因為感冒導致整個人看起來非常臃腫，慘遭網友嘲諷，她疑似受不了酸民的批評，31日才在Instagram上開砲罵人，1日就表示那篇嗆嗆的文章其實不是在講酸民，是在罵其他人。 ▲林采緹在臉書上抒發心情，粉絲留言為她加油。（圖／翻攝林采緹臉書） 林采緹31日不避諱地直言「不要再見不得別人好，我就是長得比你正，身材比你辣，賺得比你多，過得比你爽。」這段話被影射是因為受不了酸民的怒罵所寫的。但她1日在臉書上透露，很多朋友看到後都非常震麻辣火鍋 台東驚，紛紛上前關心「怎麼了？」她還澄清早就習慣酸民說的話，會如此生氣地罵人是因為聽到認識的人在背後道人長短，「當下才發洩ㄧ下本姑娘的小怒氣！」 此外，林采緹似乎怒氣還沒消，在文章最後提到不要都不了解一個人，或是沒看見別人的努力就隨便說出難聽的話，並怒嗆「有本事就活得比我漂亮，那麼我會很欣賞你而不是出一張嘴。」粉絲看到後則留言為她加油打氣，要她做自己就好。 （中央社記者溫貴香台北5日電）立法院長蘇嘉全今天召集朝野協商出現直播有畫面無聲音，時代力量黨團總召徐永明希望協商在直播場合進行，別跑到陽台；民進黨團總召柯建銘說，協商多元，不是在電視機前表演。 蘇嘉全上午二度召集朝野黨團協商有關臨時會相關事宜，朝野黨團簽署朝野協商結論，並在談話會通過這項朝野黨團協商結論，臨時會下午開始到20日止，處理的特定議案為106年度中央政府總預算案、電業法部分條文修正草案與長期照顧服務法部分條文修正草案。 民主進步黨立法院黨團總召集人柯建銘會後受訪表示，這樣的結局非常圓滿，期盼以後國會這樣運轉；被問當沖稅率調降與老舊建築重建法案，柯建銘說，暫不審議，經溝通，這兩個法案在野黨任何一黨要拉下協商，還是不會過，政治要衝突妥協才有進步。 此外，他說，不可能完全在電視轉播下朝野協商，昨天與中國國民黨團總召廖國棟談了3次，今天要先了解國民黨團會議結論，他先要私下了解國民黨開出的條件，這叫分組討論，不是在電視機前表演。 廖國棟會後受訪表示，國民黨團認為考試院副院長人事同意權行使不具急迫性，下會期開議後再處理、「當沖稅率調降與老舊建築重建法案委員會連審都沒審，一下要通過，立法院不是行政院立法局。 廖國棟表示，協商本來就多元，不是一定要在一定空間與時間或一定場域，他同意柯建銘所說，協商多元，任何有助於朝野或各黨間達成一定協議模式都不排除。 徐永明表示，實質協商都在協商外陽台上處理，希望蘇嘉全讓協商都在直播場合上進行，國民黨願對總預算案實質協商、表決大戰會降低，民進黨團同意撤一些案子，這些過程與各自考量應讓民眾知道，否則院長協商空洞化，希望各黨團與蘇嘉全堅持這個原則。 徐永明說，蘇嘉全昨天的談話對執政黨團發揮一定影響，法案數量太多不符臨時會意旨，這算是蘇嘉全成就，較可惜過程在別的地方發生。1060105 2017-01-0503:00燒烤推薦 中壢 CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University （NTU） president Yang Pan-chyr （楊泮池） was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te （林達德）, who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua （許文華） said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan （閔明源） and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen （張上淳）.“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang （郭明良） — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo （黃光國） accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh （嚴孟祿）, a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million （US$208,617） Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council （now Ministry of Science and Technology） official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun （劉源俊）, president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray （張慶瑞） and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES 龍潭 火鍋推薦中秋烤肉食材 中和
2CD643C660DDFC10 |
|
| ( 不分類｜不分類 ) |
