 
字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2017/01/10 11:51:13瀏覽19｜回應0｜推薦0 | |
 記者杜奕君／綜合報導 ▲賈索(左)隨公牛造訪熟悉的湖人主場，但首節便陷入落後局面。（圖／達志影像／美聯社） 面臨自1993年以來，隊史最長「9連敗」的洛杉磯湖人，30於主場迎戰強敵芝加哥公牛，此戰也是「鬥牛士」賈索(Pau Gasol)轉隊後首度回到洛城，紫金軍團也給予熱烈歡迎。首節雙方拚鬥激烈，湖人開局壓著公牛打，首節打完湖人以28比19取得領先年菜2017 高雄。 兩軍本季2度交鋒，也是球隊「2連霸」功臣賈索本季首度回到Staples Center，進場的觀眾，也都能獲得一件感謝賈索的紀念T恤，可見湖人對這位老臣的感念。 開賽湖人便展現氣勢，一波16比8強攻，逼得公牛連忙叫出暫停，替補上陣的布瑟(Carlos Boozer)表現強勢，連拿4分助年菜宅配網球隊取得領先。 公牛隨後由一哥「飆風玫瑰」羅斯(Derrick Rose)連拿4分同時送給賈索一次妙傳取分，但公牛仍靠克拉克森(Jordan Clarkson)與林書豪一切一投挑戰籃框，穩住領先優勢。 湖人新竹年夜飯首節攻擊火力猛烈，團隊命中率高達56.5%，反觀公牛儘管禁區及羅斯切入攻勢仍在，但外線火力並未發揮，也造成開賽一路落後的狀況。 首節湖人以布瑟拿下6分最佳，克拉克森5分，林書豪替補也有4分進帳，公牛羅斯則是6分、3助攻的穩定演出。 →點此看文字直播網頁版 下載《ET籃球瘋》，一手掌握林書豪與其他國內外籃球訊息！ ???接收更多精彩賽事，歡迎加入《ETtoday運動雲》粉絲團 ★圖片為版權照片，由達志影像供《ETtoday東森新聞雲》專用，任何網站、報刊、電視台未經達志影像許可，不得部分或全部轉載！ 2017-01-0503:00 CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University （NTU） president Yang Pan-chyr （楊泮池） was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te （林達德）, who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua （許文華） said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan （閔明源） and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen （張上淳）.“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang （郭明良） — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo （黃光國） accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh （嚴孟祿）, a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million （US$208,617） Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council （now Ministry of Science and Technology） official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun （劉源俊）, president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the univ2017年菜預購高雄市ersity reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray （張慶瑞） and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES 行政院院會上週火速通過「都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建獎勵條例」，引發外界疑慮，認為恐會衝擊公共安全。對此，內政部次長花敬群今天(3日)表示，內政部訂定年菜外送 台北的容積獎勵額度是相對恰當的標準，至於外界對於排除高度限制有疑慮，內政部願意調整。 包含建築界、地政士以及文資等團體3日共同舉行記者會，呼籲立法院臨時會停止審議危險老舊建物重建條例，隨後並前往內政部拜會政務次長花敬群，溝通法案內容。 花敬群會後表示，這個專法是針過專業評估認為有拆除、重建必要的危險建築物，且前提是社區百分之百同意，所以相較於都市防災專法，這個專法的適用個案相對單純，並不會「全面到處發生」。 花敬群指出，專法中訂定的容積獎勵事前經過多方的溝通與徵詢，獎勵額度是相對恰當的標準，並未高到都更條例的1.5倍獎勵「天花板」，又不會低到無法產生誘因。至於專家學者反對排除高度限制，花敬群表示，內政部願意調整，甚至取消放寬。他說：『(原音)我們也認為這個部分我們比較考慮欠缺周詳的話，我們很樂意做必要的調整，甚至取消掉這樣的放寬。我想我們也不覺得因為這樣，它就會影響法的立法初衷和目的，它依然可以幫到，如果它確實有一些比較難以控制的副作用的話，我們寧願在這個部分採取比較保守的方式處理。』 至於有文資團體憂心這項專法恐怕會破壞文化資產，花敬群說，若相關建物屬於文化資產保護的屬性，就會適用文資法；如果是潛在文化價值的建築或地區，在都市計畫或地方建築審議時都會有配套機制處理，並不適宜在專法中刻意加入文資相關管制，這樣反而會出現多頭馬車的情況。 花敬群說，由於都更條例修訂的範圍與議題較複雜，各方意見目前尚未整合，修法進度的不確定性較高，而危險老舊建物重建條例限定的對象相對單純，內政部才會決定另立專法先行推動。目前法案已送立法院，內政部願意就高度限制部分進一步協商、溝通，希望盡速完成立法。
E0D81FC2DF13BD4E |
|
| ( 知識學習｜其他 ) |
