網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇   字體:
跟白頂紅 -- 替敢在病態社會當官的人說幾句話
2013/08/06 23:05:57瀏覽1275|回應17|推薦1

余沒作過考究,但相信恭喜發財這句新春祝賀語源出香港,在十多億人口的華語世界中也只在香港流行。發財與發達是很多香港人的夢想或目標。在過去數十年的大部分時間裡,香港富豪榜上之前列人物備受景仰與尊重。好像忽然之間香港社會的價觀發生了一百八十度的轉變:仇富、憎人富貴、發窮惡。貧富懸殊、跨代貧窮成為差不多最流行的政治正確議題。

為了吸引讀者看下去,首先來說點沒爭議性、可能並不廣為人知,且帶有激勵振奮的內容。話說40年前的1973年再倒數至1959年的14年間,有一個叫PLAN的國際慈善組織在香港設立事處中文名定為國際培幼會。PLAN成立於1937年,專門在世界上困難的地區幫助貧窮人家的兒童。香港於70年代經濟起飛,所以PLAN就沒在香港提供援助,倒過來現時只在香港進行募捐而把籌得的善款用在第三世界裡〖現時PLAN在中國服務的名稱為國際計劃(中國)〗。在PLAN於香港服務的早年,曾援助一個居於寮屋家庭的一名6歲男孩。兩年後這家庭獲得『上樓』環境改善了便停止受助。再過14年,這名男孩從中文大學會計系畢業。經過多年力爭上游,不單事業有成且更先後擔任會計師公會會長及非牟利青少年服務機構「突破」的主席,亦獲委任為太平紳士。這個真實的跨過『跨代貧窮』脫貧個案雖然傑出,卻不是絕無僅有。於2010年響應PLAN的『與贊助人會面』呼籲,這位正同時贊助5名貧童的前受助人帶同家人飛到美國親身向48年前每月贊助他7美元的美空軍Brown上尉及其太太道謝。余就是從傳媒的報導看到這個當時被標榜的脫貧模範個案。這名不再貧窮的人也像很多其他香港人一樣把賺到的錢投資在房地產。他踏踏實實建立的正面形象被他自己於2012年作的一個決定全給摧毀了!在今日極度病態的香港社會,他成了過街老鼠!

果你看過余之前的時事網誌,就知道余絕非狼粉。但余認為狼班子裡並非全部都是狐群狗黨,有相當一部分是真有心替香港社會做點實事的。先說麥齊光,大家可翻查一下記錄,在梁展文事件調查過程中披露過在政府循例『諮詢』各有關高官對應否批准其到新世界任職時,時為常秘的麥齊光是唯一提出梁展文曾參與紅灣半島居屋變私樓,如批准其任職新世界,可能成為敏感事件。其他與麥齊光同級或比他更高級的官員均持圍威喂心態而沒有理會麥齊光所提的意見。在當時余覺得麥齊光是個好官。20多年前兩名公務員互供對方的單位可能數以萬計,麥齊光之所以落得如此下場就是他當了局長。再說林奮強, 30多歲被政府委任為中央政策組非全職顧問,40多歲成為國際投資銀行的MD201150歲選擇退休並自資成立非牟利智庫「黃金50」,這決定已可看見其對金錢之價值觀。於2012年獲委任為行政局議員時他已申報在港擁有數十個物業,市值數億元。那些向廉署誣告他的反對黨政客說廉署不檢控他感到失望,若果廉署順他們意檢控他而其後法庭判他無罪,這些政客就會對法庭感到失望。林奮強售出於2001(接近谷底價)買入已持有11年的物業賬面賺了500多萬,一來數字合理,二來這宗物業交易只佔他持貨量的一小部分,試問為此而賠上他的名聲是否公道呢?

本文第二段述說的是陳茂波。他的遭遇與林奮強同樣的不公義。他清清楚楚的說『太太及家人』,首先被政府新聞處『幫他一把』在新聞稿上寫成太太及『其』家人。其後雖重新發稿澄清,很多電子傳媒也重播原來的錄音,但更多的無良傳媒及政客之後仍不停的屈他--說他把兒子說成是太太的家人,甚至拗橫折曲極度侮辱性地說兒子不是他生的。在1994年,即是他當官前18年,他太太名下的公司於新界買了在2012年市值才區區270萬權益的土地,叫他為囤地波的人他日在地府必受拔舌之刑才是天理昭昭。

陳茂波與林奮強完全符合現行遊戲規則(申報制度),他們錯在哪裡呢?答案恰恰就是個多星期前在垃圾會發展委員會上一名撐東北發展的新界土豪的發言裡。陳茂波與林奮強錯就錯在他們當官不是一窮二白卻有錢有樓更有地。幾年前陳啟宗說過一句至理名言:『香港是中國裡面最左的地方』。在老毛死後『無產階級專政』在大陸已無甚市場,在香港似乎指日可待矣。

後記:余拋磚引玉得到眾同學及各方好友積極回應,令內容豐富充實,蓬蓽生輝,十分感謝!因版面所限,較早的精彩回應已由網站安排為第二頁(包括蔡醫生之第一次回應、賀醫生的回應及余答复Gulliver第一次回應時所增補有關何建宗的個案)。請點擊畫面的右下方 (灰色的看本文的下一頁, 綠色的看下一篇文章)


 

 

( 時事評論政治 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:http://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=xingwanlilu&aid=8097549

 回應文章 頁/共 2 頁  回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁

C Chiu
埋錯CY班
2018/05/05 01:20
 同意你的觀點,這些官員的不幸,可能只是埋錯CY班。我轉發了這篇有關波叔的文章(http://nextplus.nextmedia.com/news/latest/20170116/469965)後,有些朋友也表達了「總之唔鍾意佢,冇得解。」的感覺。

yiu
拆烂污
2014/08/08 12:59
反对派+名为建制派的反梁分子实际吃里趴外,要拆烂污,他们最希望梁一事无成, 最怕他能为香港做点成绩出来。所以一定要将梁班子内就是只有点抱负、能力的都要请走。

top dog
2013/08/10 23:55

History is strewn with countless utopian projects led by demagogue .which had  shone for a while but eventually sunken into oblivion or  imploded in flames . As the old adage goes' the road to perdition is paved with good intentions' I shuddered to contemplate where our current corps of opportunistic politicians, scheming snake oil salesmen , misguided one issue  eggheads and the rag tag armies of  clueless post 80s 90s dilettantes are leading Hong Kong into. But  looking at what has happened and what is still happening daily , it seems that the ginnie  is already out and the piped piper is calling his tune. No matter how reluctant ,Hong Kong is  marching  into the abyss of no return. 


top dog
Where the armies of clueless post 90s dilettantes are leading Hong Kong into ?
2013/08/10 23:49

In their petition letter to the court,the cousins of Mr Mak Chai Kwong wrote ,'... when we were young, brother chai kwong would construct toys from discarded material for us because we could not afford any..' From this, one can infer that Mak was probably not from a privileged family, Zhang has told the story of Paul Chan. From my recollection , Franklin Lam was raised by his widowed mother who was a primary school teacher. So all three are from rather humble background and with sheer efforts they rose to the top ; the sort of Horatio Algar stories that Hong Kongers love to trumpet about. Messers chan lam and mak are financially comfortable and they don't look like those greedy sorts. I genuinely believe that when they joined the administration of CY Leung they want to contribute something to the society through their expertise.

But look at the dire situation they got themselves into. They are hounded by lynching mobs who bay for their blood, wanting to serve their heads on a plate as sacrifice to their dark god of vengeance. Self righteous press harass their family members, searching for materials in the nooks and crannies of their lives to be used in smearing campaigns( this is especially despicable in the case of Paul Chan ) They first had their character assassinated and then crucified to be judged by public opinion instead of in the law court.

All these are done of course in the name of the 'core values ' of Hong Kong. Little do these narrow minded people comprehend what they are doing serves only to undermine the very core values they purport to protect. They are tearing up the fabric of Hong Kong society; a decent society if ever there is one which our parents have strived so hard againgst all odds to build over the last 50 years. It behooves us to cherish, protect and improve it instead of ripping it apart as a knee jerk reflex of blind fury.We will rue the day when it is so broken as to be beyond repair.


gulliver
POWER VACUUM
2013/08/09 17:38
To look at the bigger picture:
1. The liberal n hardliner in china r still fighting it out through corruption , sex n scandal charges
2. The old colonial hk tycoon that used to control the legislative n hk govt top official r now told n forced to take their money n leave or face the ICAC
3. The Chinese state companies r taking over the local banks, supermarket n property development projects
4. The usa r coming back to Asia to make trade n finance n at the same time contain china
5. Now is a fight for this power vacuum in hk between the Chinese hardliner, liberal n the west with this people power of universal suffrage
6. Both Chinese liberal n hardliner will never allow hk to become another japan, Philippine , Taiwan or Vietnam etc that threaten it's grip in power in china
7.what we r seeing in the media , street fight , ICAC , official scandal n fighting at the legislative council n occupy central etc r a fight for power left open by the leaving of hk tycoon
8. Will we see the same street fight in hk like what is happening in Egypt n Bangkok? My guess is not
9. When will this power vacuum be filled , I hope when the politic up north r settle n china n the west can agree on a way to share the control n influence of hk governing
10 then hk can truly prosperous for years to come n be used by both the east n west to print n raise money to power the growth of Asia

gulliver
2013/08/09 11:44

 George

I didn't know u work at FS Li before , I was there in 1983, did not meet paul chan there , is he older than us?

Do not know him , he is just in a sinking ship , with his backer, cy, Ronnie,Tung , Wu , Wen the so call liberal n western influence

 

Top dog, Don't worry , conspiracy theory say that those professor n student that want to occupy central do work for the central govt, they play the role to divide the supporter of democrat support by the west n a 反教材 to hk n when time comes, they will be used as an excuse for the police to show force n clamp down real hard


Howard
無限上綱
2013/08/09 11:24
這篇文章能以非梁粉之立場,郤公正地為其班底人仗義執言,使人拜服,更引出眾同學回應,難能可貴。香港近年變得不像我們認識的地方,樓價物價上漲使年輕一代仇富,這心態可以理解。但傳媒,政客恐天下不亂,煽風點火, 加深各階層矛盾,使互相仇視之心日深。60年代文革的可怕我們只是耳聞,但今天打著民主旗號的,把非友即敵的人無限上綱,我們郤是親眼目睹。價值觀全變了,沒有尊師重道,夠爛仔敢打橫行便是英雄,難怪多位同學都有感而發
我想補充一點,恭喜發財已不是香港獨有。加拿大政客為討好華人選民,每年農曆新年,這句'口頭禪'已是郎郎上口,粵語普通話皆通,借傳媒討好華人一番。美國那邊也許Jian可補充一下。

Robbery
2013/08/09 03:18
My point is why the policy will take a private land owner land for hk$950 Psf n his land owner neighbor next door can get hk$22,500 Psf , this policy is not fair, n it is the govt that decide who got how much by it's zoning plan n the size of land n who knows how much land a group of companies owns by holding them through different layer of BVi companies, it's just the same as telling the mum n pa neighborhood grocery store owner to close down for business n only the supermarket chain can carry one n make money because the small grocery store r too small. , this kind of laws r not fair
zhangWL(xingwanlilu) 於 2013-08-09 21:27 回覆:
Gulliver, i hv not read the compensation/acquisition scheme. it does sound unreasonable if neighboring plots' value can differ by >20 folds. but, it's more important to find out whether zoning is done arbitrarily with salamandeering or with justifiable rationales.
zhangWL(xingwanlilu) 於 2013-08-09 21:31 回覆:
Gulliver, i hv not read the compensation/acquisition scheme. it does sound unreasonable if neighboring plots' value can differ by >20 folds. but, it's more important to find out whether zoning is done arbitrarily with salamandeering or with justifiable rationales.

polly
2013/08/09 00:10
為麥齊光、林奮強的離開感到可惜;支持陳茂汲波堅持留低!

Gary Chan
屯地
2013/08/08 19:53

?94 ?98 買了兩幅地,2012才做局長.....這叫屯地!!其實鬥梁班子,是鬥梁,更是鬥共產党。故梁振英,不會被中央叫下台。中央看香港的政治矛盾定性為敵我矛盾;記住美國已重返亞洲。

 

頁/共 2 頁  回應文第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁