|
|
文章數：76 |
 三希樓大型聚餐空間夠不夠？》台中公益路top10聚餐餐廳｜最真實心得分享 |
| 興趣嗜好｜偶像追星 2026/04/21 10:18:26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
身為一個熱愛美食、喜歡在城市裡挖掘驚喜的人，臺中公益路一直是我最常出沒的地方之一。這條路可說是「臺中人的美食戰場」，從精緻西餐到創意火鍋，從日式丼飯到義式早午餐，每走幾步，就會有完全不同的特色料理餐廳。 這次我特別花了一整個月，實際造訪了公益路上十間口碑不錯的餐廳。有的是網友熱推的打卡名店，也有隱藏在巷弄裡的小驚喜。我以環境氛圍、口味表現、價格CP值與再訪意願為基準，整理出這篇實測評比。希望能幫正在猶豫去哪裡吃飯的你，找到那一間「吃完會想再來」的餐廳。 評比標準與整理方向
這次我走訪的10家餐廳橫跨不同料理類型，從高質感牛排館到巷弄系早午餐，每一間都有自己獨特的風格。為了讓整體比較更客觀，我依照以下四大面向進行評比，並搭配實際用餐體驗來打分。
整體而言，我希望這份評比不只是「哪家好吃」，而是幫你在不同情境下（約會、家庭聚餐、朋友小聚、商業午餐）都能快速找到合適的選擇。畢竟，美食不只是味覺的滿足，更是一段段與朋友共享的生活記憶。 10間臺中公益路餐廳評比懶人包公益路向來是臺中人聚餐的首選地段，從火鍋、燒肉到中式料理與早午餐，每走幾步就有驚喜。以下是我實際造訪過的10間代表性餐廳清單，橫跨平價、創意、高級各路風格。
一頭牛日式燒肉｜炭香濃郁的和牛饗宴，約會聚餐首選
走在公益路上，很難不被 一頭牛日式燒肉 的木質外觀吸引。低調卻不失質感的門面，搭配昏黃燈光與暖色調的內裝，讓人一進門就感受到濃濃的日式職人氛圍。店內空間不大，但桌距規劃得宜，每桌皆設有獨立排煙設備，烤肉時完全不怕滿身油煙味。 餐點特色
一頭牛的靈魂，絕對是他們招牌的「三國和牛拼盤」。 用餐體驗整體節奏掌握得非常好。店員會在你剛想烤下一片肉時貼心遞上夾子、幫忙換烤網，讓人完全不用分心。整場用餐過程就像一場表演，從視覺、嗅覺到味覺都被滿足。 綜合評分
地址：408臺中市南屯區公益路二段162號電話：04-23206800 小結語一頭牛日式燒肉不僅是「吃肉的地方」，更像是一場五感盛宴。從進門那一刻到最後一道甜點，都能感受到他們對細節的用心。 TANG Zhan 湯棧｜文青系火鍋代表，麻香湯底與視覺美感並重
在公益路這條美食戰線上，TANG Zhan 湯棧 是讓人一眼就會想走進去的那一種。 餐點特色
湯棧最有名的當然是它的「麻香鍋」。 用餐體驗整體氛圍比一般火鍋店更有質感。 綜合評分
地址：408臺中市南屯區公益路二段248號電話：04-22580617 官網：https://www.facebook.com/TangZhan.tw/ 小結語TANG Zhan 湯棧 把傳統火鍋做出新的樣貌保留臺式鍋物的溫度，又結合現代風格與細節服務，讓吃鍋這件事變得更有品味。 如果你想找一間兼具「好吃、好拍、好放鬆」的火鍋店，湯棧會是公益路上最有風格的選擇之一。 NINI 尼尼臺中店｜明亮寬敞的義式早午餐天堂
如果說前兩間是肉食愛好者的天堂，那 NINI 尼尼臺中店 絕對是想放鬆、聊聊天的好地方。餐廳外觀以白色系與大片玻璃窗為主，陽光灑進室內，讓人一踏入就有種度假般的輕盈感。假日早午餐時段特別熱鬧，建議提早訂位。 餐點特色
NINI 的菜單融合義式與臺灣人口味，選擇多樣且份量十足。主打的 松露燉飯 濃郁卻不膩口，米芯保留微Q口感；而 香蒜海鮮義大利麵 則以新鮮白蝦、花枝與淡菜搭配微辣蒜香，口感層次豐富。 用餐體驗店內氣氛輕鬆不拘謹，無論是一個人帶電腦工作、或朋友聚餐，都能找到舒服角落。餐點上桌速度穩定，服務人員態度親切、補水與收盤都非常主動。整體節奏讓人覺得「時間變慢了」，很適合想遠離忙碌日常的人。 綜合評分
地址：40861臺中市南屯區公益路二段18號電話：04-23288498 小結語NINI 尼尼臺中店是一間能讓人放下手機、慢慢吃飯的餐廳。餐點不追求浮誇，而是以「剛剛好」的份量與風味，陪伴每個平凡午後。如果你在找一間能邊吃邊聊天、拍照也漂亮的早午餐店，NINI 會是你在公益路上最不費力的幸福選擇。 加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物｜平價卻用心的湯頭系火鍋，家庭聚餐好選擇
在公益路這條高質感餐廳林立的戰場上，加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物 走的是截然不同的路線。它沒有浮誇的裝潢、也沒有高價位的套餐，但靠著實在的湯頭與親切的服務，默默吸引許多回頭客。每到用餐時間，總能看到家庭或情侶三兩成群地圍著鍋邊聊天。 餐點特色
主打 北海道浜中昆布湯底，湯頭清澈卻不單薄，越煮越能喝出海藻與柴魚的自然香氣。 用餐體驗整體氛圍偏家庭取向，桌距寬敞、座位舒適，帶小孩來也不覺擁擠。店員態度親切，補湯、收盤都很勤快，給人一種「被照顧著」的安心感。 綜合評分
地址：403臺中市西區公益路288號電話：0910855180 小結語加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物是一間「不浮誇、但會讓人想再訪」的火鍋店。它不追求豪華擺盤，而是用最簡單的湯頭與新鮮食材，傳遞出家常卻不平凡的溫度。 印月餐廳｜中式料理的藝術演繹，宴客與家庭聚會首選
說到臺中公益路的中式料理代表，印月餐廳 絕對是榜上有名。這間開業多年的餐廳以「中菜西吃」的概念聞名，把傳統中式料理以現代手法重新詮釋。從建築外觀到餐具擺設，每個細節都散發著低調的典雅氣息。 餐點特色
印月最令人印象深刻的是他們將傳統中菜融入創意手法。 用餐體驗服務方面完全對得起餐廳的高級定位。從入座、點餐到上菜節奏，都拿捏得恰如其分。每道菜都會有服務人員細心介紹食材與吃法，讓人感受到「被款待」的尊榮感。 綜合評分
地址：408臺中市南屯區公益路二段818號電話：0422511155 小結語印月餐廳是一間「不只吃飯，更像品味生活」的地方。 KoDō 和牛燒肉｜極致職人精神，專為儀式感與頂級味覺而生
若要形容 KoDō 和牛燒肉 的用餐體驗，一句話足以總結——「像在欣賞一場關於肉的表演」。 餐點特色
這裡主打 日本A5和牛冷藏肉，以「精切厚燒」的方式呈現。 用餐體驗KoDō 的最大特色是「儀式感」。 綜合評分
地址：403臺中市西區公益路260號電話：0423220312 官網：https://www.facebook.com/kodo2018/ 小結語KoDō 和牛燒肉不是日常餐廳，而是一場體驗。 永心鳳茶｜在茶香裡用餐的優雅時光，臺味早午餐的新詮釋
走進 永心鳳茶公益店，彷彿進入一間有氣質的茶館。 餐點特色
永心鳳茶的餐點結合中式靈魂與西式擺盤，無論是「炸雞腿飯」還是「紅玉紅茶拿鐵」，都能讓人感受到熟悉卻不平凡的味道。 用餐體驗店內服務人員態度溫和，對茶品介紹詳盡。上餐節奏剛好，不急不徐。 綜合評分
地址：40360臺中市西區公益路68號三樓(勤美誠品)電話：0423221118 小結語永心鳳茶讓人重新定義「臺味」。 三希樓｜老饕級江浙功夫菜，穩重又帶人情味的中式饗宴
位於公益路上的 三希樓 是許多臺中老饕的口袋名單。 餐點特色
三希樓的菜色以 江浙與港式料理 為主，兼顧傳統與現代風味。 用餐體驗三希樓的服務給人一種老派但貼心的感覺。 綜合評分
地址：408臺中市南屯區公益路二段95號電話：0423202322 官網：https://www.sanxilou.com.tw/ 小結語三希樓是一間「吃得出功夫」的餐廳。 一笈壽司｜低調奢華的無菜單日料，職人手藝詮釋旬味極致
在熱鬧的公益路上，一笈壽司 低調得幾乎不顯眼。 餐點特色
一笈壽司採 Omakase（無菜單料理） 形式，每一餐都由主廚根據當日食材設計。 用餐體驗整場用餐約90分鐘，節奏緩慢但沉穩。 綜合評分
地址：408臺中市南屯區公益路二段25號電話：0423206368 官網：https://www.facebook.com/YIJI.sushi/ 小結語一笈壽司是一間真正讓人「放慢呼吸」的餐廳。 茶六燒肉堂｜人氣爆棚的和牛燒肉聖地，肉香與幸福感同時滿分
若要票選公益路上「最難訂位」的餐廳，茶六燒肉堂 絕對名列前茅。 餐點特色
茶六主打 和牛燒肉套餐，價格約落在 $700–$1000 間，份量與品質兼具。 用餐體驗茶六的服務效率相當高。店員親切、換網勤快、補水速度快，整場用餐流程流暢無壓力。 綜合評分
地址：403臺中市西區公益路268號電話：0423281167 官網：https://inline.app/booking/-L93VSXuz8o86ahWDRg0:inline-live-karuizawa/-LUYUEIOYwa7GCUpAFWA 小結語茶六燒肉堂用「穩定品質＋輕奢氛圍」抓住了臺中年輕族群的心。 吃完10家公益路餐廳後的心得與結語吃完這十家餐廳後，臺中公益路不只是一條美食街，而是一段生活風景線。 有的餐廳講究細膩與儀式感，像 一頭牛日式燒肉 與 一笈壽司，讓人感受到食材最純粹的美好 有的則以親切與溫度打動人心，像 加分昆布鍋物、永心鳳茶，讓人明白吃飯不只是為了飽足，而是一種被照顧的幸福。 而像茶六燒肉堂、TANG Zhan 湯棧 這類人氣名店，則用穩定的品質與熱絡的氛圍，成為許多臺中人心中「想吃肉就去那裡」的代名詞。 這十家店，構成了公益路最動人的縮影 有華麗的，也有溫柔的；有傳統的，也有創新的。 每一家都在自己的風格裡發光，讓人吃到的不只是料理，而是一種生活的溫度與節奏。 對我而言，這不僅是一場美食旅程，更是一趟關於「臺中味道」的回憶之旅。 FAQ：關於臺中公益路美食常見問題Q1：公益路哪一區的餐廳最集中？ Q2：需要提前訂位嗎？ 最後的話若要用一句話形容這趟美食之旅，我會說： 加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物適合辦尾牙嗎？ 如果你也和我一樣喜歡用味蕾探索一座城市，那就把這篇公益路美食攻略收藏起來吧。加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物尾牙氣氛熱鬧嗎？ 無論是約會、慶生、家庭聚餐，或只是想犒賞一下辛苦的自己——這條路上永遠會有一間剛剛好的餐廳在等你。一頭牛日式燒肉肉質如何？ 下一餐，不妨從這10家開始。加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物商務聚餐適合嗎？ 打開手機、約上朋友，讓公益路成為你生活裡最容易抵達的小確幸。NINI 尼尼臺中店節慶時段會不會太難訂位？ 如果你有私心愛店，也歡迎留言分享，茶六燒肉堂用餐環境舒服嗎？ 你的推薦，可能讓我下一趟美食旅程變得更精彩。一笈壽司過年期間會開門嗎？ Jumping Spider Close Up Harvard study shows jumping spiders can distinguish living objects from non-living objects based on their movement. Add this to the list of real-life spidey senses: Harvard researchers have shown that jumping spiders are able to tell the difference between animate objects and inanimate objects — an ability previously known only in vertebrates, including humans. Using a specialized treadmill system and a point-light display animation, the team of scientists found that these spiders are able to recognize biological motion. This type of motion refers to the visual movements that come from living organisms when they are moving. The visual cue is how people, even babies, can tell someone is another person just by the way their bodies move. Many animals can do this, too. The ability, which is critical for survival, is evolutionarily ancient since it is so widespread across vertebrates. The study from the Harvard team is believed to be the first demonstration of biological motion recognition in an invertebrate. The findings pose crucial questions about the evolutionary history of the ability and complex visual processing in non-vertebrates. “[It] opens the possibility that such mechanisms might be widespread across the animal kingdom and not necessarily related to sociality,” the researchers wrote in the paper, which was published in PLOS Biology on July 15, 2021. The study was authored by a team of researchers working in the lab of Paul Shamble, a John Harvard Distinguished Science Fellow. Massimo De Agrò (previously a postdoctoral researcher in the lab and now at the Animal Comparative Economics laboratory at the University of Regensburg, Germany) lead the project, along with co-authors Daniela C. Rößler (now a Zukunftskolleg Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Konstanz and the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior), and Kris Kim (a researcher in the Shamble Lab). The researchers chose jumping spiders to test biological motion cues because the animals are among the most visually adept of all arthropods. With eight eyes, for example, vision plays a central role in a wide range of behaviors. They placed the jumping spiders, a species called Menemerus semilimbatus, into a forced-choice experiment. They suspended the spiders above a spherical treadmill so their legs could make contact with it. The spiders were kept in a fixed position so only its legs could move, transferring its intended direction to the sphere which spun freely because of a constant stream of compressed air shooting up below it. (Friendly disclaimer: No spiders were harmed during the experiment and all were freed in the same place they were captured afterward.) Once in position, the spiders were presented two animations as stimuli. The animations were called point-light displays, each consisting of a dozen or so small lights (or points) that were attached to key joints of another spider so they could record its movements. The body itself is not visible, but the digital points give a body-plan outline and impression of a living organism. In humans, for example, it only takes about eleven dots on the main joints of the body for observers to correctly identify it as another person. For the spiders, the displays followed the motion of another spider walking. Most of the displays gave the impression of seeing a living animal. Some of the displays were less real than others and one, called a random display, did not give the impression it was living. The researchers then observed how the spiders reacted and which light display they turned toward on the treadmill. They found the spiders reacted to the different point-light displays by pivoting and facing them directly, which indicated that the spiders were able to recognize biological motion. Curiously, the team found the spiders preferred rotating towards the more artificial displays and always toward the random one when it was part of the choice. They initially thought they would turn more toward the displays simulating another spider and possible danger, but the behavior made sense in the context of jumping spiders and how their secondary set of eyes work to decode information. “The secondary eyes are looking at this point-light display of biological motion and it can already understand it, whereas the other random motion is weird and they don’t understand what’s there,” De Agrò said. The researchers hope to look into biological motion recognition in other invertebrates such as other insects or mollusks. The findings could lead to greater understanding of how these creatures perceive the world, De Agrò said. For more on this research, read How Spiders Can Distinguish Living From Non-Living Objects in Their Peripheral Vision. Reference: “Perception of biological motion by jumping spiders” by Massimo De Agrò, Daniela C. Rößler, Kris Kim and Paul S. Shamble, 15 July 2021, PLOS Biology. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001172 Dr. Owen Gilbert, researcher at the Department of Integrative Biology at the University of Texas at Austin (USA) and author of the recent paper suggesting the natural reward theory of evolution. Credit: LE Gilbert Gilbert’s theory of natural reward complements natural selection by explaining how innovative traits succeed over time, offering new insights into macroevolution and life’s increasing complexity. A link between evolution over short time frames (microevolution) and long time frames (macroevolution) that could open new approaches to understanding some of biology’s deepest questions is proposed by Dr. Owen Gilbert of the Department of Integrative Biology at the University of Texas at Austin (USA) in a new paper, published in the open-access, peer-reviewed journal Rethinking Ecology. In his work, Gilbert suggests that there is an alternative non-random force of evolution, which acts synergistically with natural selection and leads to the increased innovativeness, or advancement, of life with time. The novel concept complements Darwin’s theory of evolution and addresses the questions it has left unanswered. “This could solve the mystery of why life has become more innovative with time,” points out Gilbert. Redefining Evolutionary Mechanisms Rather than assume that natural selection applies to long-preserved units like species or clades, or that natural selection works for the long-term goal of “fitness maximization,” Gilbert reworked the foundations of evolutionary theory to show that there is room for another non-random force of evolution, natural reward. Gilbert distinguishes the genetic units and time frames of long-term evolution. Whereas natural selection alters gene frequencies within species, Gilbert argues, natural reward alters the total abundance of entire genetic systems, including genetic codes, gene networks, and genetic regulatory modules shared by species and higher taxa. Gilbert proposes that natural reward also applies to cycles of invention, expansion and extinction, which happen over thousands to millions of generations, and which, when repeated, extend into deep evolutionary time. “All previous theories of macroevolution assumed that natural selection is the only non-random force,” Gilbert said. “This meant that researchers had to either extrapolate from microevolution to macroevolution, or assign foresight to natural selection–which everyone knows is an adulteration of the theory.” “A main advantage of invoking natural reward as a separate force is that it means natural selection can be used to explain the stepwise origin of complex traits, without assigning omniscience to natural selection.” Forming an analogy to economics, Gilbert argues that natural selection plays the role of nature’s blind inventor, creating complex “inventions” without an eye to the broader market, while natural reward acts as nature’s blind entrepreneur, spreading complex inventions to the markets or environments that immediately demand them. “With this framework, it becomes possible to clearly separate problems of origin and success, which have long been muddled,” Gilbert said. “The result is new insights on major problems of biology.” Addressing Unanswered Questions in Biology In the light of the natural reward theory, Gilbert reviews questions of the evolution of evolvability, why sexual reproduction is widespread, the fixation of a single genetic code, and the factors causing apparently sudden bursts of evolutionary change. Gilbert also investigates the question of whether the mammalian replacement of dinosaurs may be considered an advancement of life, culminating with a brief review of the cause of success of human economic systems. “Only time will tell if the theory of natural reward is correct,” Gilbert said. “Existing data show, however, that its main assumptions are justified and that the theory holds promise in yielding new insights on major biological problems.” In his conclusion, Gilbert summarizes the main implication of the natural reward theory, “… advancement is explained as an expected outcome of two deterministic evolutionary forces, natural selection and natural reward, acting together without foresight for the future.” Reference: “Natural reward drives the advancement of life” by Owen M. Gilbert, 27 November 2020, Rethinking Ecology. DOI: 10.3897/rethinkingecology.5.58518 Rice University bioengineers have developed a groundbreaking construction kit for building customizable sense-and-respond circuits in human cells, enabling them to detect disease signals and trigger precise therapeutic responses. This breakthrough in synthetic biology could revolutionize treatments for complex conditions like cancer and autoimmune diseases by creating “smart cells” that react in real time. Rice lab pioneers an assembly kit for synthetic sense-and-respond circuits in human cells. Rice University bioengineers have created a groundbreaking construction kit for designing custom sense-and-respond circuits in human cells. Published in Science, this research marks a significant advancement in synthetic biology, with the potential to transform treatments for complex diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. “Imagine tiny processors inside cells made of proteins that can ‘decide’ how to respond to specific signals like inflammation, tumor growth markers, or blood sugar levels,” said Xiaoyu Yang, a graduate student in the Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology Ph.D. program at Rice who is the lead author on the study. “This work brings us a whole lot closer to being able to build ‘smart cells’ that can detect signs of disease and immediately release customizable treatments in response.” The new approach to artificial cellular circuit design relies on phosphorylation — a natural process cells use to respond to their environment that features the addition of a phosphate group to a protein. Phosphorylation is involved in a wide range of cellular functions, including the conversion of extracellular signals into intracellular responses — e.g., moving, secreting a substance, reacting to a pathogen, or expressing a gene. Xiaoyu Yang (left photo); Caleb Bashor and Xiaoyu Yang (right photo). Credit: Photos by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University In multicellular organisms, phosphorylation-based signaling often involves a multistage, cascading effect like falling dominoes. Previous attempts at harnessing this mechanism for therapeutic purposes in human cells have focused on re-engineering native, existing signaling pathways. However, the complexity of the pathways makes them difficult to work with, so applications have remained fairly limited. A New Perspective on Circuit Design Thanks to Rice researchers’ new findings, however, phosphorylation-based innovations in “smart cell” engineering could see a significant uptick in the coming years. What enabled this breakthrough was a shift in perspective. Phosphorylation is a sequential process that unfolds as a series of interconnected cycles leading from cellular input (i.e. something the cell encounters or senses in its environment) to output (what the cell does in response). What the research team realized — and set out to prove — was that each cycle in a cascade can be treated as an elementary unit, and these units can be linked together in new ways to construct entirely novel pathways that link cellular inputs and outputs. “This opens up the signaling circuit design space dramatically,” said Caleb Bashor, an assistant professor of bioengineering and biosciences and corresponding author on the study. “It turns out, phosphorylation cycles are not just interconnected but interconnectable — this is something that we were not sure could be done with this level of sophistication before. “Our design strategy enabled us to engineer synthetic phosphorylation circuits that are not only highly tunable but that can also function in parallel with cells’ own processes without impacting their viability or growth rate.” Xiaoyu Yang and Caleb Bashor (on the right, top right-hand side photo) in the Genetic Design and Engineering Center at Rice University; Bashor, an assistant professor of bioengineering and biosciences and deputy director of the Rice Synthetic Biology Institute, is the corresponding author on a study on engineering synthetic phosphorylation signaling networks in human cells published in the journal Science. Credit: Photos by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University While this may sound straightforward, figuring out the rules for how to build, connect, and tune the units — including the design of intra- and extracellular outputs — was anything but. Moreover, the fact that synthetic circuits could be built and implemented in living cells was not a given. “We didn’t necessarily expect that our synthetic signaling circuits, which are composed entirely of engineered protein parts, would perform with a similar speed and efficiency as natural signaling pathways found in human cells,” Yang said. “Needless to say, we were pleasantly surprised to find that to be the case. It took a lot of effort and collaboration to pull it off.” Advantages of the Modular Approach The do-it-yourself, modular approach to cellular circuit design proved capable of reproducing an important systems-level ability of native phosphorylation cascades, namely amplifying weak input signals into macroscopic outputs. Experimental observations of this effect verified the team’s quantitative modeling predictions, reinforcing the new framework’s value as a foundational tool for synthetic biology. Another distinct advantage of the new approach to sense-and-respond cellular circuit design is that phosphorylation occurs rapidly in only seconds or minutes, so the new synthetic phospho-signaling circuits could potentially be programmed to respond to physiological events that occur on a similar timescale. In contrast, many previous synthetic circuit designs were based on different molecular processes such as transcription, which can take many hours to activate. Xiaoyu Yang, a graduate student in the Systems, Synthetic and Physical Biology Ph.D. program at Rice, is the lead author on a study published in the journal Science. Credit: Photo by Jeff Fitlow/Rice University The researchers also tested the circuits for sensitivity and ability to respond to external signals like inflammatory factors. To prove its translational potential, the team used the framework to engineer a cellular circuit that can detect these factors and could be used to control autoimmune flare-ups and reduce immunotherapy-associated toxicity. “Our research proves that it is possible to build programmable circuits in human cells that respond to signals quickly and accurately, and it is the first report of a construction kit for engineering synthetic phosphorylation circuits,” said Bashor, who also serves as deputy director for the Rice Synthetic Biology Institute, which was launched earlier this year in order to capitalize on Rice’s deep expertise in the field and catalyze collaborative research. Caroline Ajo-Franklin, who serves as institute director, said the study’s findings are an example of the transformative work Rice researchers are doing in synthetic biology. “If in the last 20 years, synthetic biologists have learned how to manipulate the way bacteria gradually respond to environmental cues, the Bashor lab’s work vaults us forward to a new frontier — controlling mammalian cells’ immediate response to change,” said Ajo-Franklin, a professor of biosciences, bioengineering, chemical, and biomolecular engineering and a Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas Scholar. Reference: “Engineering synthetic phosphorylation signaling networks in human cells” by Xiaoyu Yang, Jason W. Rocks, Kaiyi Jiang, Andrew J. Walters, Kshitij Rai, Jing Liu, Jason Nguyen, Scott D. Olson, Pankaj Mehta, James J. Collins, Nichole M. Daringer and Caleb J. Bashor, 2 January 2025, Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adm8485 The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01EB029483, R01EB032272, R21NS116302, 5R35GM119461), the Office of Naval Research (N00014-21-1-4006), the Robert J. Kleberg Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation, the Claire Glassell Pediatric Fund, the Grace Reynolds Wall Research Fund and the National Science Foundation (1842494). RRG455KLJIEVEWWF |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 最新創作 |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
