網路城邦
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇  字體:
新技術的95%就比傳統的79.34%來得好?
2021/01/07 16:57:41瀏覽494|回應1|推薦13

In my previous writing "79.34%保護效力,低了㸃嗎?" (http://classic-blog.udn.com/kkuo0810/155056629), I left a question to you: is the vaccine  of 79.34% efficacy by Sinopharm produced inferior to its counterpart of Pfizer which boasts of 95% efficacy? 

Attached below please find another article written in popular science to compare the one of Sinopharm produced in traditional method with the other one of Pfizer in a new tech called mRNA: https://user.guancha.cn/main/content?id=442762&page=1.  Again, please make judgement by yourselves.

BTW, the other day that imbecile speakman of "Committee of Mainland Affairs" commented on the free-of-charge inoculation on Sinopharm vaccine  and threatened the islanders in Mainland not being "guinea pigs" to the vaccine.  For crying out loud, I just cannot believe my ears!  Injecting or not injecting is totally up to the people from Taiwan to use their discretion.  Let me tell you, Mr Speakman, those who are living, studying, or doing business in China Mainland are definitely smarter than you, so please lose no sleep over the decision they are going to make.   

( 創作散文 )
回應 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
上一篇 回創作列表 下一篇

引用
引用網址:https://classic-blog.udn.com/article/trackback.jsp?uid=kkuo0810&aid=155168607

 回應文章

安歐門
等級:8
留言加入好友
2021/01/08 09:49

沒疫苗的台灣,實在沒資格談論別人疫苗幾%有效,

當初為了支持國產疫苗,硬是不肯預購他國產品,

現在買不到,只好發動網軍鬼叫,政客一貫伎倆,

可憐台灣人,不能出國,正好符合消費島內政策,

律師執政,手腕無限高明,豈是民眾能夠企及。

Retiredbum(kkuo0810) 於 2021-01-08 21:48 回覆:
一針見血!