字體：小 中 大 |
|
|
|
| 2011/05/06 23:24:33瀏覽343｜回應0｜推薦0 | |
出生證明書之戰（5/6/11新聞） 其實，這個由歐馬自己公佈的“東西”，經過非官方的隨便看看講：只有百萬分之一的機會，可以仿造歐馬公佈的仿造的仿造其實，這個由歐馬自己公佈的“東西”，經過非官方的隨便看看講：只有百萬分之一的機會，可以仿造歐馬公佈的仿造的仿造？......？......？。 這個歐馬講“今天公佈的出生證明書......。”，就知道不實在，因為他不言這是我的出生證明，而講公佈的出生證明。當然，現在有人講有九種方法，來辨別這個不太真實的出生證明，9種方法去看歐馬政權的左派式宣傳，同時，美國主流再一次不去證實明辨，所以，唐納問：你們主流媒體為何要護著歐馬呢？ May 6, 2011 Obama's fake birth certificate By Jeff Lukens We knew the day Barack Obama announced the release of his Birth Certificate that the document would be checked nine ways to Sunday for authenticity. Well, the Internet sleuths have done their work and preliminary indications are that it is not only fake, it is not even a good fake. I am about Obama's age and my Birth Certificate is yellowed, creased and wrinkled. I wonder why Obama's looks brand new? Maybe that is because it is brand new. Perhaps this is why he spent millions of dollars over three years to prevent its release only to hastily let it out when he started to lose the PR battle over the issue. Three websites will give you the basics on the forensic details of the document. Check them out here, here and here. The evidence is so overwhelming that the Birth Certificate is a fake, it is as if he is toying with us. Obama seems to be daring anyone to verify the document and apply it to a Constitutional standard. It's like, "Yeah, it's fake. What are you going to do about it?" His intent is obviously to stir up infighting between his opponents and throw them off track. Assuming the Birth Certificate was real, another issue regarding his constitutionality to be president that is often overlooked is the definition of a natural born citizen. Until 2008, the common understanding of a natural born citizen was that all persons born within the U.S., of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, were natural born citizens. Obama's father (being Kenyan and in 1961 being a subject of the British Crown) would by this definition exclude Obama as a natural born citizen. He would be classified a naturalized citizen. If this case ever came in front of the Supreme Court, however, it is likely the court would disregard all previous definitions and rule that Obama is a natural born citizen. They would likely disregard any evidence of a fake Birth Certificate as well. Obama was sworn in as president two years ago, and they would not have the nerve to remove him from office after all this time. More details about his Birth Certificate will surely come out over time. There are many things about his past, school records, a Connecticut Social Security Number, and passport records (to name a few) that are unexplained or hidden from public view. Most of his life before 2004 has been covered up. In time, probably after he leaves office, it will all come out. It always does. There is no political advantage for Republicans to pursue the false Birth Certificate. That should have been done in 2008. To do so now, in fact, would be a disservice to their efforts to defeat him politically. Obama is just a figurehead for the Progressive movement, and the GOP will need to defeat him on the issues or their calls for a return to conservatism won't really matter anyway. If Obama's opponents try to impeach him or litigate this issue in court, Obama knows it will go nowhere. History and the court of public opinion will be the ultimate judge of President Barack Obama. =====================================================  Obama's Apparent Long Form Birth Certificate Fraud A very clear, easy-to-understand comparative analysis Analysis by Pro Graphics and Special Effects UPDATE: For what it's worth I will go on record as confirming the authenticity of the analysis on the video birtherreport provided beneath my analysis. I did exactly the same thing demonstrated in the video from exactly the same downloaded document and got precisely the same result. Remember, those "B"s were supposed to be made with a manual typewriter. The fact that two letters match up right to the pixel is *** absolutely impossible*** for a legit copy of a typewritten document, especially one from that era. By sophisticated process-enlarging the image and comparing them on a sub-pixel basis they STILL line up as identical. This cannot happen. It isn't a million to one as the video states. It's a billion to one - or more. Surely the FBI and CIA must know this and see it. Their techniques of and technology for forensic analysis are far greater than anyone in the public sector. You cannot have two different scanned letters supposedly originally made with a manual typewriter line up to the pixel after sub-pixel analysis. It's forensics 101. It's impossible. That, the layers, and in my mind the very obvious lack of any physical aging of the document of which the one presented is supposedly a copy, this is lining up to be a very, very obvious fraud. The problem is the press hates this issue and wants to destroy it to protect Obama. We can only hope Trump hires some people of very recognizable esteem who are willing to claim authorship the the examination results to do what we have all done and expose this fraud publicly. We can speculate on how it came to be, but the reality is that what the White House put up simply isn't a real copy of an original 50-year old typewritten document. This is graphic analysis/forensics 101. It simply isn't possible by any law of averages that anyone understands. This is a fake.     |
|
| ( 時事評論｜政治 ) |
