您寫得真好！道盡城邦人的心聲，希望大家互勉，謝謝您貼切的`寫實。

等待Iris by 大老鷹 讓我想到.....

創造虛幻原本不是罪
	2007/03/14 09:45
網路的矛盾之一是它先天就容許了假像的存在, 但到底到啥程度算是犯罪....涉及財色隱私才算嗎? 或是涉及情感受傷便算? 後者或許更是道德層面的問題 如果事件主角不出面, 恐怕只好消聲匿跡, 讓人永遠懷疑是騙子或讓人想像將會另起爐灶再創新高, 殊為可惜 然則我相信, 類似事件本是網路常態之一, 不會是最後一次 p.s.我也覺醫生要像探子+心理師才當得好

深有同感，還是醫生好，能診斷出病因，對症下藥！

妳說得真是實情，有關那個打錯字又修改過的「痕跡」，有時也真讓人沮喪呢！明明我打出的是這個字，怎麼經過微軟注音排列後卻出現別的字！通常做錯字的校對自己是很難查出來的，總是要查上好幾回......

Of course there are rules governing the conduct, morality, decency and, last but not least, legality even in blogsphere.

Public conduct, morality and decency are harder to define, yet, whatever the majority of the populace, as in this case the UDN city, perceives as appropriate, pleasant, and fair, will be honored and held. As for the legal domain regarding intellectual property, copy right, and privacy protection, the common legal theories stipulate that one can’t be prosecuted for what one THINKS, but one certainly WILL be prosecuted for what one does, especially when the act is in violation of laws and public ordinance.

Thus for the unauthorized recommendation case regarding Iris happened couple of days ago, anyone whose name was mysteriously and automatically listed on here recommending list, has the legal right to sue him/her under the privacy protection clause. Let alone his/her illegal use of materials without written/or oral permission from other web blogs.

Whether or not, UDN pursuit’s legal action against the perpetrator who hacks into their system is a judgment call, yet, it certainly has the right to do so.

笑話 或 星座 測驗

還可接受

大家都知不是創作

我看了笑呵呵

不錯啊

我也認為原創最重要，好不好反而其次，至於為了虛榮暗藏程式製造超高人氣，雖不可取，只要內容真的好，又是原創，再加上若肯出面道個歉，應可以得到網友的原諒吧！

最討厭的就是盜文啦！

It takes all kind of bloggers to make the world.
Since the blogging is still in its infancy there is no difinite rule to govern the blogging.
The UDN rules govern the bloggers in its own territory while its own standard might
not apply  to that of CT and other places of the world.

As for the each individual blogger, they tend to have their own rules of their concience.
Each individual is different. I would not critisize any one who has conducting blogging
with his or her free time, being it good or bad, and its out of blogger' willingness.
Due to lack of existing law, so far to my understanding, this blogger has expressed and
touched most of key points of blogging espects for the future bloggers to follow. However,
it is not generily accepted by all bloggers the world over. It involves the race sex age and
systems of the countries they are living in.

Oh, this may be too long. I better to stop here

黃蝶兒總是把網誌當成日記～
雖然放上來的文字多少經過修飾,人名經過取代，
但有些事情有些心情就是想找人分享，
不能放到現實生活枱面上的就放到這兒大說特說，
網誌很適合蝶兒這種悶葫蘆．．

不過，
對抄襲轉貼倒是敏感了些，
好文是該共賞，但卻覺該標明那是出自何處何者的手筆，
是種尊重，

至於轉寄
蝶兒則只收不發,多數朋友知道後就不會再寄

最喜歡聯網的推薦機制
像來到妳家讀完文章,總是覺得這麼好的文字以蝶兒文字思緒的拙劣是對不上的,
但至少可以推薦鼓掌
那是對好文章的敬意吶～

（繼續潛水去．．．）