|
|
文章數:139 |
加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物適合辦尾牙嗎?》台中公益路吃爆指南|10家餐廳逐間介紹 |
| 知識學習|考試升學 2026/04/18 23:09:02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
身為一個熱愛美食、喜歡在城市裡挖掘驚喜的人,臺中公益路一直是我最常出沒的地方之一。這條路可說是「臺中人的美食戰場」,從精緻西餐到創意火鍋,從日式丼飯到義式早午餐,每走幾步,就會有完全不同的特色料理餐廳。 這次我特別花了一整個月,實際造訪了公益路上十間口碑不錯的餐廳。有的是網友熱推的打卡名店,也有隱藏在巷弄裡的小驚喜。我以環境氛圍、口味表現、價格CP值與再訪意願為基準,整理出這篇實測評比。希望能幫正在猶豫去哪裡吃飯的你,找到那一間「吃完會想再來」的餐廳。 評比標準與整理方向
這次我走訪的10家餐廳橫跨不同料理類型,從高質感牛排館到巷弄系早午餐,每一間都有自己獨特的風格。為了讓整體比較更客觀,我依照以下四大面向進行評比,並搭配實際用餐體驗來打分。
整體而言,我希望這份評比不只是「哪家好吃」,而是幫你在不同情境下(約會、家庭聚餐、朋友小聚、商業午餐)都能快速找到合適的選擇。畢竟,美食不只是味覺的滿足,更是一段段與朋友共享的生活記憶。 10間臺中公益路餐廳評比懶人包公益路向來是臺中人聚餐的首選地段,從火鍋、燒肉到中式料理與早午餐,每走幾步就有驚喜。以下是我實際造訪過的10間代表性餐廳清單,橫跨平價、創意、高級各路風格。
一頭牛日式燒肉|炭香濃郁的和牛饗宴,約會聚餐首選
走在公益路上,很難不被 一頭牛日式燒肉 的木質外觀吸引。低調卻不失質感的門面,搭配昏黃燈光與暖色調的內裝,讓人一進門就感受到濃濃的日式職人氛圍。店內空間不大,但桌距規劃得宜,每桌皆設有獨立排煙設備,烤肉時完全不怕滿身油煙味。 餐點特色
一頭牛的靈魂,絕對是他們招牌的「三國和牛拼盤」。 用餐體驗整體節奏掌握得非常好。店員會在你剛想烤下一片肉時貼心遞上夾子、幫忙換烤網,讓人完全不用分心。整場用餐過程就像一場表演,從視覺、嗅覺到味覺都被滿足。 綜合評分
地址:408臺中市南屯區公益路二段162號電話:04-23206800 小結語一頭牛日式燒肉不僅是「吃肉的地方」,更像是一場五感盛宴。從進門那一刻到最後一道甜點,都能感受到他們對細節的用心。 TANG Zhan 湯棧|文青系火鍋代表,麻香湯底與視覺美感並重
在公益路這條美食戰線上,TANG Zhan 湯棧 是讓人一眼就會想走進去的那一種。 餐點特色
湯棧最有名的當然是它的「麻香鍋」。 用餐體驗整體氛圍比一般火鍋店更有質感。 綜合評分
地址:408臺中市南屯區公益路二段248號電話:04-22580617 官網:https://www.facebook.com/TangZhan.tw/ 小結語TANG Zhan 湯棧 把傳統火鍋做出新的樣貌保留臺式鍋物的溫度,又結合現代風格與細節服務,讓吃鍋這件事變得更有品味。 如果你想找一間兼具「好吃、好拍、好放鬆」的火鍋店,湯棧會是公益路上最有風格的選擇之一。 NINI 尼尼臺中店|明亮寬敞的義式早午餐天堂
如果說前兩間是肉食愛好者的天堂,那 NINI 尼尼臺中店 絕對是想放鬆、聊聊天的好地方。餐廳外觀以白色系與大片玻璃窗為主,陽光灑進室內,讓人一踏入就有種度假般的輕盈感。假日早午餐時段特別熱鬧,建議提早訂位。 餐點特色
NINI 的菜單融合義式與臺灣人口味,選擇多樣且份量十足。主打的 松露燉飯 濃郁卻不膩口,米芯保留微Q口感;而 香蒜海鮮義大利麵 則以新鮮白蝦、花枝與淡菜搭配微辣蒜香,口感層次豐富。 用餐體驗店內氣氛輕鬆不拘謹,無論是一個人帶電腦工作、或朋友聚餐,都能找到舒服角落。餐點上桌速度穩定,服務人員態度親切、補水與收盤都非常主動。整體節奏讓人覺得「時間變慢了」,很適合想遠離忙碌日常的人。 綜合評分
地址:40861臺中市南屯區公益路二段18號電話:04-23288498 小結語NINI 尼尼臺中店是一間能讓人放下手機、慢慢吃飯的餐廳。餐點不追求浮誇,而是以「剛剛好」的份量與風味,陪伴每個平凡午後。如果你在找一間能邊吃邊聊天、拍照也漂亮的早午餐店,NINI 會是你在公益路上最不費力的幸福選擇。 加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物|平價卻用心的湯頭系火鍋,家庭聚餐好選擇
在公益路這條高質感餐廳林立的戰場上,加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物 走的是截然不同的路線。它沒有浮誇的裝潢、也沒有高價位的套餐,但靠著實在的湯頭與親切的服務,默默吸引許多回頭客。每到用餐時間,總能看到家庭或情侶三兩成群地圍著鍋邊聊天。 餐點特色
主打 北海道浜中昆布湯底,湯頭清澈卻不單薄,越煮越能喝出海藻與柴魚的自然香氣。 用餐體驗整體氛圍偏家庭取向,桌距寬敞、座位舒適,帶小孩來也不覺擁擠。店員態度親切,補湯、收盤都很勤快,給人一種「被照顧著」的安心感。 綜合評分
地址:403臺中市西區公益路288號電話:0910855180 小結語加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物是一間「不浮誇、但會讓人想再訪」的火鍋店。它不追求豪華擺盤,而是用最簡單的湯頭與新鮮食材,傳遞出家常卻不平凡的溫度。 印月餐廳|中式料理的藝術演繹,宴客與家庭聚會首選
說到臺中公益路的中式料理代表,印月餐廳 絕對是榜上有名。這間開業多年的餐廳以「中菜西吃」的概念聞名,把傳統中式料理以現代手法重新詮釋。從建築外觀到餐具擺設,每個細節都散發著低調的典雅氣息。 餐點特色
印月最令人印象深刻的是他們將傳統中菜融入創意手法。 用餐體驗服務方面完全對得起餐廳的高級定位。從入座、點餐到上菜節奏,都拿捏得恰如其分。每道菜都會有服務人員細心介紹食材與吃法,讓人感受到「被款待」的尊榮感。 綜合評分
地址:408臺中市南屯區公益路二段818號電話:0422511155 小結語印月餐廳是一間「不只吃飯,更像品味生活」的地方。 KoDō 和牛燒肉|極致職人精神,專為儀式感與頂級味覺而生
若要形容 KoDō 和牛燒肉 的用餐體驗,一句話足以總結——「像在欣賞一場關於肉的表演」。 餐點特色
這裡主打 日本A5和牛冷藏肉,以「精切厚燒」的方式呈現。 用餐體驗KoDō 的最大特色是「儀式感」。 綜合評分
地址:403臺中市西區公益路260號電話:0423220312 官網:https://www.facebook.com/kodo2018/ 小結語KoDō 和牛燒肉不是日常餐廳,而是一場體驗。 永心鳳茶|在茶香裡用餐的優雅時光,臺味早午餐的新詮釋
走進 永心鳳茶公益店,彷彿進入一間有氣質的茶館。 餐點特色
永心鳳茶的餐點結合中式靈魂與西式擺盤,無論是「炸雞腿飯」還是「紅玉紅茶拿鐵」,都能讓人感受到熟悉卻不平凡的味道。 用餐體驗店內服務人員態度溫和,對茶品介紹詳盡。上餐節奏剛好,不急不徐。 綜合評分
地址:40360臺中市西區公益路68號三樓(勤美誠品)電話:0423221118 小結語永心鳳茶讓人重新定義「臺味」。 三希樓|老饕級江浙功夫菜,穩重又帶人情味的中式饗宴
位於公益路上的 三希樓 是許多臺中老饕的口袋名單。 餐點特色
三希樓的菜色以 江浙與港式料理 為主,兼顧傳統與現代風味。 用餐體驗三希樓的服務給人一種老派但貼心的感覺。 綜合評分
地址:408臺中市南屯區公益路二段95號電話:0423202322 官網:https://www.sanxilou.com.tw/ 小結語三希樓是一間「吃得出功夫」的餐廳。 一笈壽司|低調奢華的無菜單日料,職人手藝詮釋旬味極致
在熱鬧的公益路上,一笈壽司 低調得幾乎不顯眼。 餐點特色
一笈壽司採 Omakase(無菜單料理) 形式,每一餐都由主廚根據當日食材設計。 用餐體驗整場用餐約90分鐘,節奏緩慢但沉穩。 綜合評分
地址:408臺中市南屯區公益路二段25號電話:0423206368 官網:https://www.facebook.com/YIJI.sushi/ 小結語一笈壽司是一間真正讓人「放慢呼吸」的餐廳。 茶六燒肉堂|人氣爆棚的和牛燒肉聖地,肉香與幸福感同時滿分
若要票選公益路上「最難訂位」的餐廳,茶六燒肉堂 絕對名列前茅。 餐點特色
茶六主打 和牛燒肉套餐,價格約落在 $700–$1000 間,份量與品質兼具。 用餐體驗茶六的服務效率相當高。店員親切、換網勤快、補水速度快,整場用餐流程流暢無壓力。 綜合評分
地址:403臺中市西區公益路268號電話:0423281167 官網:https://inline.app/booking/-L93VSXuz8o86ahWDRg0:inline-live-karuizawa/-LUYUEIOYwa7GCUpAFWA 小結語茶六燒肉堂用「穩定品質+輕奢氛圍」抓住了臺中年輕族群的心。 吃完10家公益路餐廳後的心得與結語吃完這十家餐廳後,臺中公益路不只是一條美食街,而是一段生活風景線。 有的餐廳講究細膩與儀式感,像 一頭牛日式燒肉 與 一笈壽司,讓人感受到食材最純粹的美好 有的則以親切與溫度打動人心,像 加分昆布鍋物、永心鳳茶,讓人明白吃飯不只是為了飽足,而是一種被照顧的幸福。 而像茶六燒肉堂、TANG Zhan 湯棧 這類人氣名店,則用穩定的品質與熱絡的氛圍,成為許多臺中人心中「想吃肉就去那裡」的代名詞。 這十家店,構成了公益路最動人的縮影 有華麗的,也有溫柔的;有傳統的,也有創新的。 每一家都在自己的風格裡發光,讓人吃到的不只是料理,而是一種生活的溫度與節奏。 對我而言,這不僅是一場美食旅程,更是一趟關於「臺中味道」的回憶之旅。 FAQ:關於臺中公益路美食常見問題Q1:公益路哪一區的餐廳最集中? Q2:需要提前訂位嗎? 最後的話若要用一句話形容這趟美食之旅,我會說: 永心鳳茶尾牙氣氛熱鬧嗎? 如果你也和我一樣喜歡用味蕾探索一座城市,那就把這篇公益路美食攻略收藏起來吧。NINI 尼尼臺中店婚前派對適合嗎? 無論是約會、慶生、家庭聚餐,或只是想犒賞一下辛苦的自己——這條路上永遠會有一間剛剛好的餐廳在等你。三希樓節慶時段會不會太難訂位? 下一餐,不妨從這10家開始。加分100%浜中特選昆布鍋物春酒菜色豐富嗎? 打開手機、約上朋友,讓公益路成為你生活裡最容易抵達的小確幸。NINI 尼尼臺中店商務聚餐適合嗎? 如果你有私心愛店,也歡迎留言分享,三希樓適合請客嗎? 你的推薦,可能讓我下一趟美食旅程變得更精彩。茶六燒肉堂年末聚餐推薦嗎? The findings lend support to the theory that microRNAs play an essential role in the evolution of intelligent life. New research suggests that microRNAs play a crucial role in the advanced development of the brain, including in humans. Octopuses have fascinated scientists and the public with their remarkable intelligence, from using tools to engaging in creative play, problem-solving, and even escaping from aquariums. Now, their cognitive abilities may provide significant insight into understanding the evolution of complex life and cognition, including the human brain. An international team of researchers from Dartmouth College and the Max Delbrück Center (MDC) in Germany has published a study in the journal Science Advances, revealing that octopuses are the first known invertebrates to contain a high number of gene-regulating microRNAs. The genes of two octopus species were found to have an increase in microRNAs, which are associated with the development of advanced cells with specific functions, over evolutionary time, a finding that has previously only been observed in humans, mammals, and other vertebrates. When combined with the known intelligence of octopuses, the findings provide crucial support for the theory that microRNAs are key to the evolution of intelligent life, said co-corresponding author Kevin Peterson, a Dartmouth professor of biological sciences. The nervous systems of octopuses and squids — which both belong to a type of mollusk known as cephalopods — evolved independently of vertebrates. Yet, the prevalence of microRNAs in both octopuses and vertebrates suggests a common role for the molecules in advanced cognition. MicroRNAs and the Evolution of Cognition “MicroRNAs are known as the ‘dark matter’ of the animal genome — they don’t make protein, but they regulate the expression of proteins,” Peterson said, referring to the hypothetical form of matter thought to constitute most of the universe. “This is the only instance in all of the invertebrates of dramatic microRNA increase and those genes are all expressed in the brain,” he said. “This was always a big test for the hypothesis, that it is not specific to vertebrates. This was a big moment — we discovered the secret to complex life, and the secret to complex life is microRNAs.” MicroRNAs were first reported in 1993 by Victor Ambros, a professor at Dartmouth from 1992-2007 who is now a professor at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. For nearly 15 years, Peterson and his research group have sequenced the genes of various animal species in order to link microRNAs to complex tissue development and brain evolution. For the latest paper, Peterson’s group worked with the lab of co-corresponding author Nikolaus Rajewsky, professor of systems biology at MDC, which had a wealth of RNA data on octopus species, particularly the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Peterson and co-author Peter Chabot, of Dartmouth’s Class of 2022, worked through raw data of microRNAs sequenced from octopus species and identified specific sequences that were either new or already found in these animals. Their work provided an organized and annotated data set that was essential to the paper’s findings, Chabot said. Peterson’s research has shown that creatures such as placental mammals whose genes have increased in number and complexity over evolutionary time also exhibit increasing concentrations of microRNAs. On the other hand, organisms such as parasites have lost ancestral genes — and microRNAs — as they have become less complex. “In order to have new cognitive abilities and behaviors requires new cell types,” Peterson said. “The two places you get this — in placental mammals and cephalopods — is also where we see these microRNA-expressed genes. Animals that don’t seem to have changed very much in the past 500 million years don’t have very many microRNAs. “Every time we’ve tested this hypothesis, we’ve found it very viable, and we’ve not been able to refute it yet. That’s what made this paper particularly exciting,” he said. Behavioral Evidence of Octopus Intelligence Octopuses possess an uncommon intelligence. In 2016, an octopus named Inky made international headlines after escaping from the National Aquarium of New Zealand by slipping through a gap in his tank and pulling himself several feet across the floor to a nearly 150-foot drainpipe leading to the sea — and his freedom. Octopuses also have been observed collecting and building shelters from discarded coconut shells and using water currents to play catch with various objects. This kind of intelligence potentially stems from microRNAs’ role in diversifying cell function, said study co-author Bastian Fromm, a research group leader at the University of Tromsø in Norway who collaborates with the Peterson lab on its research and building the online microRNA database, MirGeneDB. Cells in complex organisms perform specialized tasks, which means surrounding cells need to be calibrated to carry out additional functions, Fromm said. “MicroRNAs are like light switches or dimmers that can turn on and regulate the expression of thousands of proteins in a cell and specify what the cell can do,” Fromm said. “This is a numbers game. Oysters and slugs have microRNAs, but in cephalopods — and especially the octopus — there is an explosion of them that correlates with their intelligence.” Reference: “MicroRNAs are deeply linked to the emergence of the complex octopus brain” by Grygoriy Zolotarov, Bastian Fromm, Ivano Legnini, Salah Ayoub, Gianluca Polese, Valeria Maselli, Peter J. Chabot, Jakob Vinther, Ruth Styfhals, Eve Seuntjens, Anna Di Cosmo, Kevin J. Peterson and Nikolaus Rajewsky, 25 November 2022, Science Advances. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add9938 The study was funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation; the National Science Foundation; NASA’s Ames Research Center; Dartmouth College; the Carlsberg Foundation; the Tromsø Research Foundation the Swedish Research Council’s Strategic Research Area through Stockholm University; and the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research. The whitespotted eagle ray (Aetobatus narinari) break apart hard shells like clams, oysters and conch using their fortified jaws to access the prey’s soft tissues. Credit: Florida Atlantic University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Scientists First To Quantify Consumption Noises Using Whitespotted Eagle Rays “Shell-crushing” — exactly what it sounds like — is a predatory mode used by numerous marine life from crabs to octopuses to large fishes and mammals when they eat hard-shelled mollusks like clams, oysters and conchs. These predators have to break apart the shell using robust claws or fortified jaws to access the prey’s soft tissues. Despite its prevalence in the marine environment, this feeding behavior has remained elusive to study remotely, particularly for larger marine animals that destroy shells almost completely, leaving behind little trace. Moreover, because they are highly mobile, scientists have difficulty in directly observing their foraging habits, which is why the ecology of shell-crushing (durophagy) remains poorly understood in larger marine predators and the ecosystems with which they interact. So, there is little understanding of where or when this happens. Turn up the sound! Using the whitespotted eagle ray and underwater acoustic recorders, a study is the first to characterize how they consume hard-shelled mollusk prey like clams in a controlled environment. Scientists could tell what a predator was eating based on how it sounds, and with this process it’s audible above ambient noise in coastal lagoons out to 100 meters. The team hopes this technology will be useful in monitoring how many clams are being eaten by large predators like rays as restoration efforts ramp up in Florida. Credit: Florida Atlantic University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Using the whitespotted eagle ray (Aetobatus narinari) as a model, a team of scientists led by Florida Atlantic University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute in collaboration with FAU’s College of Engineering and Computer Science; Mote Marine Laboratory & Aquarium; and the Florida Institute of Technology, are the first to use passive acoustics to characterize how they consume hard-shelled mollusk prey in a controlled environment. Scientists both quantified and classified shell-crushing by monitoring underwater sounds using acoustic recorders. Results, published in the Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, reveal that using this technology, prey types could be distinguished based on acoustic features. Researchers were able to determine what a predator is eating based on how it sounds. In addition, shell-crushing simulation tests in the natural environment suggest the process is audible above ambient noise in coastal lagoons out to 100 meters. The highly mobile whitespotted eagle ray (Aetobatus narinari) consumes a wide variety of mollusk species, including both bivalves and gastropods. Credit: Mote Marine Laboratory & Aquarium Why Shell-Crushing Sounds Matter “Interactions between molluscan predators and shellfish often occur in low-visibility estuarine waters. Scientists need alternative non-visual based methods to continuously monitor, gather and document critical data that may have serious conservation ramifications,” said Matt Ajemian, Ph.D., lead author, an assistant research professor at FAU’s Harbor Branch and head of the Fisheries Ecology and Conservation (FEC) Lab, who worked with FAU Harbor Branch co-authors Laurent Chérubin, Ph.D., an associate research professor; and Breanna DeGroot, M.S., research coordinator. “Passive acoustics-based documentation of shell-crushing behavior has not been seriously considered as a tool to identify the ecological role of large, mobile molluscivores before this study. We knew from previous experience with these animals that the cracks they made during feeding were loud, almost like an explosion, but there were no data to support it at the time. That’s what led us to conduct this initial study.” Whitespotted eagle rays consume a wide variety of mollusk species, including both bivalves and gastropods. For the study, scientists recorded a total of 434 prey items being eaten by rays, spanning eight species of hard-shelled mollusks. On the menu: hard clams, banded tulip, crown conch, lettered olive, Florida fighting conch, lightning whelk, pear whelk and horse conch. “Mollusks vary in texture, thickness and strength. The differences we observed in consumption signals and behavior associated with the two primary prey types analyzed are likely due to variations in these shell shapes,” said Kim Bassos-Hull, M.Sc., co-author and senior biologist with Mote Marine Lab’s Sharks & Rays Conservation Research Program. “It was clear that hard clams took a considerably longer time to process than banded tulip shells and all other gastropods. This was likely driven by the greater number of fractures rays needed to implement during processing and winnowing of hard clams presumably to access the prey’s soft tissues.” Signal characteristics of simulated crushing of hard clams in the field, which the researchers conducted by crushing clams by hand using modified heavy-duty pliers, also were similar to those recorded in the large, circular saltwater habitat. “It’s obviously hard to get a ray to eat on command in a particular time and place, so we had to get somewhat creative with the field testing,” said Ajemian. Conservation Implications for Shellfish Populations Data from this study are critically important with respect to molluscan shellfish, which provide high-quality and high-value seafood to humans, and beneficial ecosystem services, yet sources of natural mortality from large predators are largely unknown for both natural and restored populations. “The passive acoustics approach demonstrated in our study provides a unique, less-intrusive platform to remotely and directly observe predation events like shell fracture in the aquatic environment and support surveillance techniques to quantify predator-induced losses to these valuable resources, even in challenging environmental conditions,” said Chérubin. The team is hoping this technology will be of utility in monitoring how many clams are being eaten by large predators like rays as restoration efforts ramp up around the state of Florida. “We still have a lot of work to do on the automated detection-classification side of things, but this work brings us closer to remotely capturing predation in these elusive species,” said Ajemian. Reference: “Capturing shell-crushing by large mobile predators using passive acoustics technology” by Matthew J. Ajemian, Catherine Lamboy, Ali Ibrahim, Breanna C. DeGroot, Kimbrough Bassos-Hull, David A. Mann and Laurent Chérubin, 17 December 2020, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2020.151497 Study co-authors are Catherine Lamboy, Department of Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology; Ali Ibrahim, Ph.D., Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, FAU’s College of Engineering and Computer Science; and David A. Mann, Ph.D., president, Loggerhead Instruments, Inc. This work was funded by a grant from the Save Our Seas Specialty License Plate program (AWD-001259) administered by the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Foundation. From renowned photographers Chris and Monique Fallows and co-authors on the new paper: “This image has special meaning to Monique and I as it so incredibly symbolizes the unbelievable sights we witnessed in the early mornings at Seal Island, False Bay, for over two decades – the oceans most famous super predator exhibiting the most spectacular behavior seen in its 60-million-year tenure on our planet. Today tragically the waters around Seal Island are empty of these icons.” Credit: @chrisfallowsphotography Recent study questions the idea of a steady movement of white shark populations toward the east along South Africa’s shores. A team of marine biologists, experts in shark ecology, genetics, and fisheries, has challenged the findings of a recent study which claimed that the population of white sharks in South Africa has not decreased, but simply redistributed eastwards to flee predation from orcas. In September 2023 the article titled “Decline or shifting distribution? A first regional trend assessment for white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in South Africa” was published in the open-access journal Ecological Indicators. This was followed by two articles in the popular media – one in Nature titled “Orcas blamed for missing great white sharks” and another in The Conversation Africa titled “South Africa’s great white sharks are changing locations – they need to be monitored for beach safety and conservation.” Critique of the Original Study’s Conclusions In a rebuttal article published in the same journal recently, titled “Uncertainty remains for white sharks in South Africa, as population stability and redistribution cannot be concluded by Bowlby et al (2023)”, the group of concerned marine biologists highlight several issues with the methods and inferences made in the study mentioned above, and argue that the data, as currently analysed and interpreted, cannot support the claims made about population stability, nor redistribution, of South Africa’s white sharks. Dr Enrico Gennari, director of the Oceans Research Institute and lead author, says they felt obliged to raise these concerns given what it means for management: “If the white shark population is stable, there is no need for concern. However, if the declines in white shark sightings seen in former hotspots are actually representative of the population, then conservation action is urgently needed.” Firstly, regarding the claim that South Africa’s white shark population has migrated eastwards, they raise two objections. The first objection has to do with the presentation of the two datasets in the 2023 study, and that one cannot infer than an increase in the number of shark sightings in one spot, in this case, Algoa Bay, is directly comparable to a reduction in shark sightings in another spot, such as False Bay. “Putting it simply, a decrease of let’s say 80% from 100 individuals at location A cannot be the same as a 80% increase from 10 individuals at location B,” they write. A significant increase in shark sightings in one spot could be due to a variety of reasons, including improved technologies such as the use of aerial drones. A 2022-study, for example, identified a 357% spike in the use of aerial drones in South African recreational fishery since 2016. Other potential factors that could have contributed to an increase in the number of white sharks in Algoa Bay include the establishment of Marine Protected Areas around Algoa Bay since 2004 and the completion of a new port in 2006. Recently, in the Western Cape, the number of shark sightings has declined to fewer than 10 per year. “If the entire population was indeed regionally stable and those observed simply moved from East to West, one would have expected the number of white sharks in Algoa Bay to be tenfold higher,” they write. Secondly, with regard to the claim that the supposed white shark redistribution eastward was driven by shark-eating orcas, they point out that the onset of white shark declines in False Bay (2012/13), Gansbaai (2013/14) and Mossel Bay (2015) predates the first appearance of those orcas in False Bay and in Gansbaai in 2015, and in Mossel Bay only in 2017. In other words, the alleged cause cannot appear two years later than its effect. “While we agree that orcas have likely influenced white shark numbers and behaviors, and at least temporarily displaced many from their historical aggregation sites, the data as currently presented do not suggest that orcas are the primary driver of the declines in white shark observed in the Western Cape,” they write in the article. Concerns Over Conservation Efforts Dr. Sara Andreotti, a marine biologist in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University and one of the co-authors, says they are worried about the effect of the narrative on conservation efforts: “There is no evidence of the hundreds of white sharks counted in False Bay, Gansbaai, and Mossel Bay ten years ago to be aggregating now somewhere else along the South African coastline. Our concern is that unsupported claims of population stability could jeopardize conservation actions urgently needed for white sharks,” she warns. The group of concerned marine biologists urges authorities such as the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment to take a precautionary approach in light of the declines in white shark sightings from their historical hotspots, the consequent negative impact on South Africa’s ecotourism economy, the reduction in sightings of large mature white sharks, both in the Western and Eastern Cape, the very low genetic diversity of this population, the historical and current unsustainable levels of white shark deaths from the lethal shark control program of the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board, and the newly exposed white shark deaths by a coastal shark longline fishery in South Africa. “Our paper highlights the importance of robust, transparent scientific inquiry in guiding conservation efforts, while taking a precautionary approach. It also serves as a critical checkpoint, urging us to re-evaluate and reinforce our commitment to preserving South Africa’s white shark population given the critical role these apex predators play in marine ecosystems and in the economy of South Africa,” they conclude. Reference: “Uncertainty remains for white sharks in South Africa, as population stability and redistribution cannot be concluded by Bowlby et al. (2023): “Decline or shifting distribution? a first regional trend assessment for white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in South Africa” by Enrico Gennari, Neil Hammerschlag, Sara Andreotti, Chris Fallows, Monique Fallows and Matias Braccini, 29 February 2024, Ecological Indicators. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111810 RRG455KLJIEVEWWF |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 最新創作 |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||



























